Skip to main content

Critical Feminist International Relations in the Asia-Pacific

  • Chapter
Gender and Global Politics in the Asia-Pacific

Abstract

In a review appearing on the back cover of Jindy Pettman’s 1996 book Worlding Women, Cynthia Enloe suggests that the value of the work is its brazen courage to ask simple questions about international relations. Worlding Women poses questions like, “What can a Filipina mail-order bride living in Sydney, Australia tell us about lofty theorizing in international politics?” The answer, Enloe replies, is “a lot.” Through Worlding Women, Jindy Pettman is one of the pioneers of the project “to make visible places and ways that women are in the world.”1 Like Enloe’s own work, and the work of many since, the straightforward, yet extraordinary value of critical feminist investigations into international relations demonstrates a curiosity regarding how international relations affects and is affected by gendered identities. To those outside the discipline of international relations (IR) this may seem a simple task, yet feminists working inside the discipline know that that is exactly what it is not. It is a testament to the foundationally unsettling nature of critical feminist IR that feminists have faced decades of difficulties in having questions of gender taken seriously. This is because such an enquiry encourages us to challenge the boundaries of the discipline of ‘international relations’ by exploring the totality of ‘global politics.’ While the discipline of international relations reserves its reference for the ‘high politics’ of statecraft in the international system, critical feminist IR scholars concern themselves with the breadth of global politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Jan Jindy Pettman, Worlding Women (Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1996), xi.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For an excellent discussion see, Mary E. Hawkesworth, Globalization and Feminist Activism (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, Inc. 2006), 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jill Steans, “Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the ‘Mainstream’ of International Relations,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5, no. 3 (August 2003): 435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Katrina Lee-Koo, “Feminism,” in An Introduction to International Relations: Australian Perspectives, ed. Richard Devetak, Anthony Burke, and Jim George (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 75–77.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cynthia Enloe, Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (London: Pandora, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Ann Tickner, “You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists,” International Studies Quarterly 41, no. 4 (December 1997): 616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Spike Peterson, “Feminist Theories Within, Invisible to, and Beyond IR,” Brown Journal of World Affairs X, no. 2 (Winter/Spring 2004): 39.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Ann Tickner, “Feminism Meets International Relations: Some Methodological Issues,” in Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, ed. Brooke A Ackerly, Maria Stern, and Jacqui True (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rebecca Grant and Kathleen Newland, Gender and International Relations (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1991);

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Ann Tickner, Gender in International Relations: A Feminist Perspective on Achieving Global Security (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992);

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Spike Peterson, Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory (Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner, 1992);

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. Spike Peterson and Anne Sisson Runyan, ed., Global Gender Issues (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Christine Sylvester, Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pettman, Worlding Women; Marysia Zalewski and Jane Parpart, ed., The “Man Question” in International Relations (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Ann Tickner, Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  16. Christine Sylvester, Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  17. For a review of feminist scholarship in IR see Jill Steans, Gender and International Relations (London: Polity Press, 2006), chapters 1 and 2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. For thematic contributions see, for example, Carole Pateman, The Sexual Contract (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988);

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tickner, Gender in International Relations; Zillah Eisenstein, The Color of Gender: Reimaging Democracy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mary K. Meyer and Elisabeth Priigl, Gender Politics in Global Governance (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zillah Eisenstein, Against Empire: Feminisms, Race and the West (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Amrita Basu, ed., The Challenge of Local Feminisms: Women’s Movements in Global Perspective (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1995);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kumari Jayawardena and Malathi de Alwis, ed., Embodied Violence: Communalising Women’s Sexuality in South Asia (Delhi: Kali for Women, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lois Lorentzen and Jennifer Turpin, ed., The Women and War Reader (New York: New York University Press, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ritu Menon and Kamla Bhasin, Borders and Boundaries: Women in India’s Partition (Delhi: Kali for Women, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  26. Caroline Moser and Fiona Clark, ed., Victims, Perpetrators or Actors: Gender, Armed Conflict and Political Violence (London: Zed Books, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  27. Geeta Chowdhury and Sheila Nair. ed., Power in a Postcolonial World: Race, Gender and Class in International Relations (New York: Routledge, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Georgina Waylen, Gender in Third World Politics (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1996);

    Google Scholar 

  29. Georgina Waylen, “You Still Don’t Understand: Why Troubled Engagements Continue between Feminists and (Critical) IPE,” Review of International Studies 32, no. 1 (2006): 145–64;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sonia Alvarez, Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women’s Movements in Transition Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990);

    Google Scholar 

  31. Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders: Transnational Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nira Yuval-Davis and Floia Anthias, ed., Woman, Nation, State (Hampshire: Macmillan, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nira Yuval-Davis, Gender and Nation (London: Sage, 1997);

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rita Manchanda, ed., Women, War and Peace in South Asia: Beyond Victimhood to Agency (New Delhi: Sage Publishers, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  35. Deniz Kandiyoti, ed., Women, Islam and the State (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991);

    Google Scholar 

  36. Haleh Afshar, ed., Women and Politics in the Third World (London: Routledge, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Catherine M. Cole, Takyiwaa Manuh, and Stephan F. Miescher, ed., Africa After Gender: (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2007);

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dong-Sook S. Gills and Nicola Piper, ed., Women and Work in Globalising Asia (London: Routledge, 2002);

    Google Scholar 

  39. Myra Marx Ferree and Aili Mari Tripp, ed., Global Feminism: Transnational Women’s Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights (New York: New York University Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Anne-Marie Goetz, Women Development Workers: Implementing Rural Credit Programmes in Bangladesh (New Delhi: Sage, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Naila Kabeer, Mainstreaming Gender in Social Protection for the Informal Economy, Gender Mainstreaming in Development Series (London: Commonwealth Secretariat, 2008);

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shirin M. Rai, Gender and the Political Economy of Development: From Nationalism to Globalization (Cambridge: Polity, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rebecca Cook, ed., Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kelly D. Askin and Dorean M. Koenig, ed., Women and International Human Rights Law: Introduction to Women’s Human Rights Issues (Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hilary Charlesworth and Christine Chinkin, Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hawkesworth, Globalization and Feminist Activism, 2006; Jutta Joachim, Agenda Setting, the UN, and NGOs: Gender Violence and Reproductive Rights (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2007); Ferree and Tripp, ed., Global Feminism.

    Google Scholar 

  47. While they have their limitations, some examples are the activism for women’s rights, the UNSC 1325, gender-mainstreaming, seeking justice for war crimes, and gender budgeting strategies. For various analyses see, Charlotte Bunch and Niamh Reilly, Demanding Accountability: The Global Campaign and Vienna Tribunal for Women’s Human Rights (New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Women’s Global Leadership, and New York: UN Development Fund for Women, UNIFEM, 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jacqui True and Michael Mintrom, “Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming,” International Studies Quarterly 45, no. 1 (March 2001): 27–57;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Brooke Ackerly, “Women’s Human Rights Activists as Cross-Cultural Theorists,” International Journal of Feminist Politics 3, no. 3 (2001): 1–36;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jacqui True, “Mainstreaming Gender in Global Public Policy,” International Feminist Journal of Politics 5, no. 3 (November 2003): 368–96;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rhonda Sharp and Ray Broomhill, “Budgeting for Equality: The Australian Experience,” Feminist Economics 8, no.1 (2002): 25–47;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bina D’Costa, “Coming to Terms with the Past: Forming Feminist Alliance across Borders,” in Women, Power and Justice: Global Feminist Perspectives, Volume I: Politics and Activism: Ensuring the Protection of Women’s Fundamental Human Rights, ed. Luciana Ricciutelli, Angela Miles, and Margaret McFadden (London: Zed Books, 2005), 227–47.

    Google Scholar 

  53. See Nicole George in this volume; see also Lynn Wilson, Speaking to Power: Gender and Politics in the Western Pacific (New York: Routledge, 1995); Teresia K. Teaiwa, “Globalizing and Gendered Forces: The Contemporary Militarization of Pacific/Oceania,” in Gender and Globalization in Asia and the Pacific, ed. Kathy E. Ferguson and Monique Mironescu (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, forthcoming). A group of women organized anti-nuclear activism under the banner of Otil a Beluad, nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in late eighties.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nicola Piper, “Feminization of Labor Migration as Violence Against Women: International, Regional, and Local Nongovernmental Organization Responses in Asia,” Violence Against Women 9, no. 6 (2003): 723–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. See, for example, Barbara Earth, “Globalization and Human Rights as Gendered Ideologies: A Case Study from Northeast Thailand,” Gender, Technology and Development 9, no.1 (2005): 104–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Naila Kabeer, “Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment,” in Gendered Poverty and Well-Being, ed. Shahra Razavi (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Katherine Lepani, “Everything Has Come up to the Open Space: Talking about Sex in an Epidemic,” Working paper No. 15 (Canberra: Gender Relations Center, ANU, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Andrea Whittaker, ed., Women’s Health in Mainland Southeast Asia (Binghamton, NY: Haworth, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  59. This scholarship drew upon critical feminist voices rising in the West. Both Black and Indian feminists in the United States provided a vibrant and critical contribution focused on race and gender. Whereas, bell hooks, Ain’t I A Woman: Black Women and Feminism (Boston: South End Press, 1981) discussed race and class; Chandra Talpade Mohanty, “Under Western Eyes, Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses,” Boundary 2—An International Journal of Literature and Culture 13, no. 1 (1984): 333–58, pointed out the connections between nonwestern feminism and race.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. It is important to note that African feminists have also focused on this, see, for example, Joyce M. Chadya, “Mother Politics: Anti-Colonial Nationalism and the Woman Question in Africa,” Journal of Women’s History 15, no. 3 (2003): 153–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Patty O’Brien, The Pacific Muse: Exotic Femininity and the Colonial Pacific (Washington: University of Washington Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Numerous examples from Indonesia, Malaysia, India; see also Pyong Gap Min, “Korean ‘Comfort Women’: The Intersection of Colonial Power, Gender and Class,” Gender and Society 17, no. 6 (December 2003): 938–57;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Caroline Kennedy-Pipe, “Whose Security? State-Building and the ‘Emancipation’ of Women in Central Asia,” International Relations 18, no. 1 (2004): 91–107;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Brenda S. A. Yeoh and Katie Willis, ed., State/Nation/Transnation: Perspectives on Transnationalism in the Asia-Pacific (London: Routledge, 2004);

    Google Scholar 

  65. Barbara Earth, “Globalization and Human Rights as Gendered Ideologies: A Case Study from Northeast Thailand,” Gender, Technology and Development 9, no. 1 (2005): 104–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. For example, in South Asia during the partition of India and the creation of Pakistan. Veena Das, Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India (Delhi: Oxford India, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Urvashi Butalia, Other Side of Silence (Delhi: Kali for Women, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bina D’Costa, “Marginalized Identities: New Frontiers of Research for IR?” in Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, ed. Brooke A Ackerly, Maria Stern, and Jacqui True (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 129–52.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  69. See, for example, Muthiah Alagappa, ed., Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational Influences (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ken Booth and Russell Trood, ed., Strategic Cultures in the Asia-Pacific Region (London: Palgrave McMillan, 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  71. William T. Tow, Ramesh Thakur, and In-Taek Hyun, ed., Asia’s Emerging Regional Order: Reconciling Traditional and Human Security (New York: United Nations University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  72. William T. Tow, Asia-Pacific Strategic Relations: Seeking Convergent Security (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001); security sector reform in post-conflict states or recent police trainings in the Solomon Islands (RAMSI).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Jindy Pettman, “Questions of Identity: Australia and Asia,” in Critical Security Studies and World Politics, ed. Ken Booth (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2005), 159–77.

    Google Scholar 

  74. See Stephen Chan, Peter G. Mandaville, and Roland Bleiker, ed., The Zen of International Relations: IR Theory from East to West (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  75. Anthony Burke and Matt McDonald, ed., Critical Security in the Asia-Pacific (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2007);

    Google Scholar 

  76. Roland Bleiker, Divided Korea: Toward A Culture of Reconciliation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  77. In India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, the Philippines, and New Zealand; see also Mark R. Thompson, “Female Leadership of Democratic Transitions in Asia,” Pacific Affairs 75, no. 4 (Winter 2002/2003): 535–55. The lowest representation of women in Parliament is in PNG, Bangladesh (which had two female heads) and Vanuatu. Thalif Deen, New York: Global Information Network, April 23, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Popularized by the feminist discourse of development and women’s networks such as DAWN; see also Jane Parpart, Shirin M. Rai, and Kathleen Staudt, ed., Rethinking Empowerment: Gender and Development in a Global/Local World (London: Routledge, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Bernadette Resurrecion, “Women’s Politics in Asia—Conference Report,” Gender, Technology and Development 7, no. 3, 2003: 441–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. See Shakira Hussein, “The War on Terror and the Rescue of Muslim Women,” in Islam in World Politics, ed. Nelly Lahoud and Anthony Johns (London: Routledge, 2003), 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Jindy Pettman, “Feminist International Relations After 9/11,” Brown Journal of World Affairs X, no. 2 (2004): 89.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Katrina Lee-Koo, “Security as Enslavement/Security as Emancipation: Gendered Legacies and Feminist Futures in the Asia-Pacific,” in Critical Security in the Asia-Pacific, ed. Anthony Burke and Matt McDonald (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2007), 231–46.

    Google Scholar 

  83. For details see “Violence against Women in War, Network, Japan,” http://wwwl.jca.apc.org/vaww-net-japan/english/womenstribunal2000/whatstribunal.html (accessed January 29, 2008); Katharina R. Mendoza, “Freeing the ‘Slaves of Destiny’: The Lolas of the Filipino Comfort Women Movement,” Cultural Dynamics 15, no. 3 (2003): 247–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Bina D’Costa and Katrina Lee-Koo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D’Costa, B., Lee-Koo, K. (2009). Critical Feminist International Relations in the Asia-Pacific. In: D’Costa, B., Lee-Koo, K. (eds) Gender and Global Politics in the Asia-Pacific. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230617742_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics