Skip to main content

“Kampf dem Kampf”: Aesthetic Experimentation and Social Satire in The Ballad of Berlin

  • Chapter
German Postwar Films

Part of the book series: Studies in European Culture and History ((SECH))

  • 80 Accesses

Abstract

According to Manfred Barthel’s filmhistorical memoir So war es wirklich, Robert A. Stemmle’s Berliner Ballade was a “milestone” event in the German postwar film landscape.1 Based on a highly successful Berlin cabaret performance by Günter Neumann, who also wrote the screenplay, the film outdid almost all other rubble films at the box office.2 Despite some irritation with the cabaret-inspired form, the contemporary critical response was overall positive as well, and Berliner Ballade was awarded a special prize “for the brilliant [geistvolle] depiction of German postwar circumstances” at the 1949 Biennale Film Festival in Venice.3 This contemporary acclaim contrasts starkly with the dominantly negative terms in which the film has been discussed in more recent film scholarship. Berliner Ballade is, of course, not the only immediate postwar film to meet with such critical dismissal. But even in the context of general rubble film reception “as a kind of miscarriage, both in terms of film and intellectual history,”4 Berliner Ballade has scored particularly badly. Seldom discussed at any length, the film tends to be summarily criticized as politically reactionary, alternatively as an example for emerging anticommunism under Allied censorship,5 as exemplifying contemporary longings for the return of state order,6 or as a “power fantasy” and “narrative redemption of the Reichshauptstadt” at the end of the rubble period.7

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Manfred Barthel, So war es wirklich: Der deutsche Nachkriegsfilm (Munich: Herbig, 1986), p.38. In 1965, Peter Pleyer still described the film as the most consequential political satire of the German postwar production until 1949; Deutscher Nachkriegsfilm 1946–1948 (Münster: C.J.Fahle, 1965), p.130.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Robert R. Shandley, Rubble Films: German Cinema in the Shadow of the Third Reich (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001), p.174.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas Brandlmeier, “Von Hitler zu Adenauer: Deutsche Trümmerfilme,” in Zwischen Gestern und Morgen: Westdeutscher Nachkriegsfilm 1946–1962, ed. Hilmar Hoffmann and Walter Schobert (Frankfurt am Main: Union Druckerei, 1989), pp.32–59, here 34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wolfgang Becker and Norbert Schöll: In jenen Tagen … Wie der deutsche Nachkriegsfilm die Vergangenheit bewältigte (Opladen: Leske and Budrich, 1995), pp.70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Thomas Elsaesser, “New German Cinema and History: The Case of Alexander Kluge,” in The German Cinema Book, eds. Tim Bergfelder, Erica Carter, and Deniz Göktürk (London: BFI, 2002), pp.182–191, here p.183.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thus also Anton Kaes, Deutschlandbilder. Die Wiederkehr der Geschichte als Film (München: edition text und kritik, 1987), pp.18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Affaire Blum was directed by Erich Engel in 1948. A few years later, Stemmle also shot the first feature-length film addressing the topic of interracial children in postwar society, Toxi (Munich: Fono-Film GmbH, 1952). The film remains highly ambivalent in its attempt to address racism while failing to imagine the social integration of Black Germans (see Heide Fehrenbach, Race after Hitler: Black Occupation Children in Postwar Germany [Princeton University Press, 2005]).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stemmle’s pre-NS theater and cabaret work showed socialist as well as avant-garde sympathies. From 1930 to 1934, he was employed as a leading dramaturge at Tobis Cinema; afterward, he worked as both screenplay writer and director for different film companies, including UFA (see Pierau, for a short published summary of his research: http://www.uni-magdeburg.de/mbl/Biografien/0984.htm; as well as the Stemmle article in CineGraph—Lexikon zum deutschsprachigen Film [Munich: edition text+kritik, 1984ff.; online at: http://www.filmportal.de; last access July 13, 2006]). Neumann had begun his career in different Berlin cabarets in the late 1920s. After 1933, he continued to work in the now heavily censored cabaret sector until 1937, repeatedly getting into trouble with the NS authorities for individual productions (see Bryan T. VanSweringen, Kabarettist an der Front des Kalten Krieges. Günter Neumann und das politische Kabarett in der Programmgestaltung des RIAS 1948–1968, trans. Regine Schulze [Passau: Wiss.Verlag Rothe, 1989], here pp.45–58).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Directed by Kurt Hoffmann (UFA). On this film, see Cary Nathenson: “Fear of Flying: Education to Manhood in Nazi Film Comedies: Glückskinder and Quax, der Bruchpilot,” Cultural History through a National Socialist Lens: Essays on the Cinema of the Third Reich, ed. Robert C. Reimer (Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2000), pp.84–108;

    Google Scholar 

  10. on the problematic entertainment—ideology distinction in general Eric Rentschler, The Ministry of Illusion: Nazi Cinema and its Afterlife (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996);

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lutz Koepnick, The Dark Mirror: German Cinema between Hitler and Hollywood (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Hayden White, “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality,” in The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Laura Mulvey, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” in Screen 16.3 (1975): 6–18;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. see Tom Gunning, “The Cinema of Attractions: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde,” in Early Cinema: Space—Frame—Narrative, ed. Thomas Elsaesser with Adam Barker (London: British Film Institute, 1990), pp.56–62, and, for example, Classical Hollywood Comedy, ed. Kristine Brunovska Karnick and Henry Jenkins (New York: Routledge, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sergei Eisenstein, “The Montage of Film Attractions,” in The European Cinema Reader, ed. Catherine Fowler (London: Routledge, 2002), pp.25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sarah Kozloff, Invisible Storytellers: Voice-Over Narration in American Fiction Film (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988), p.23.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Terri J. Gordon, “Fascism and the Female Form: Performance Art in the Third Reich,” in Journal of the History of Sexuality 11.1/2 (January/April 2002): 164–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. For an overview see, for example, Hans Dollinger, Friedrich II. von Preußen: Sein Bild im Wandel von zwei Jahrhunderten (München: List, 1986), pp.193–216.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Wilfried Wilms William Rasch

Copyright information

© 2008 Wilfried Wilms and William Rasch

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Breger, C. (2008). “Kampf dem Kampf”: Aesthetic Experimentation and Social Satire in The Ballad of Berlin . In: Wilms, W., Rasch, W. (eds) German Postwar Films. Studies in European Culture and History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616974_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics