Abstract
According to Manfred Barthel’s filmhistorical memoir So war es wirklich, Robert A. Stemmle’s Berliner Ballade was a “milestone” event in the German postwar film landscape.1 Based on a highly successful Berlin cabaret performance by Günter Neumann, who also wrote the screenplay, the film outdid almost all other rubble films at the box office.2 Despite some irritation with the cabaret-inspired form, the contemporary critical response was overall positive as well, and Berliner Ballade was awarded a special prize “for the brilliant [geistvolle] depiction of German postwar circumstances” at the 1949 Biennale Film Festival in Venice.3 This contemporary acclaim contrasts starkly with the dominantly negative terms in which the film has been discussed in more recent film scholarship. Berliner Ballade is, of course, not the only immediate postwar film to meet with such critical dismissal. But even in the context of general rubble film reception “as a kind of miscarriage, both in terms of film and intellectual history,”4 Berliner Ballade has scored particularly badly. Seldom discussed at any length, the film tends to be summarily criticized as politically reactionary, alternatively as an example for emerging anticommunism under Allied censorship,5 as exemplifying contemporary longings for the return of state order,6 or as a “power fantasy” and “narrative redemption of the Reichshauptstadt” at the end of the rubble period.7
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Manfred Barthel, So war es wirklich: Der deutsche Nachkriegsfilm (Munich: Herbig, 1986), p.38. In 1965, Peter Pleyer still described the film as the most consequential political satire of the German postwar production until 1949; Deutscher Nachkriegsfilm 1946–1948 (Münster: C.J.Fahle, 1965), p.130.
See Robert R. Shandley, Rubble Films: German Cinema in the Shadow of the Third Reich (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001), p.174.
Thomas Brandlmeier, “Von Hitler zu Adenauer: Deutsche Trümmerfilme,” in Zwischen Gestern und Morgen: Westdeutscher Nachkriegsfilm 1946–1962, ed. Hilmar Hoffmann and Walter Schobert (Frankfurt am Main: Union Druckerei, 1989), pp.32–59, here 34.
Wolfgang Becker and Norbert Schöll: In jenen Tagen … Wie der deutsche Nachkriegsfilm die Vergangenheit bewältigte (Opladen: Leske and Budrich, 1995), pp.70–71.
See Thomas Elsaesser, “New German Cinema and History: The Case of Alexander Kluge,” in The German Cinema Book, eds. Tim Bergfelder, Erica Carter, and Deniz Göktürk (London: BFI, 2002), pp.182–191, here p.183.
Thus also Anton Kaes, Deutschlandbilder. Die Wiederkehr der Geschichte als Film (München: edition text und kritik, 1987), pp.18–20.
Affaire Blum was directed by Erich Engel in 1948. A few years later, Stemmle also shot the first feature-length film addressing the topic of interracial children in postwar society, Toxi (Munich: Fono-Film GmbH, 1952). The film remains highly ambivalent in its attempt to address racism while failing to imagine the social integration of Black Germans (see Heide Fehrenbach, Race after Hitler: Black Occupation Children in Postwar Germany [Princeton University Press, 2005]).
Stemmle’s pre-NS theater and cabaret work showed socialist as well as avant-garde sympathies. From 1930 to 1934, he was employed as a leading dramaturge at Tobis Cinema; afterward, he worked as both screenplay writer and director for different film companies, including UFA (see Pierau, for a short published summary of his research: http://www.uni-magdeburg.de/mbl/Biografien/0984.htm; as well as the Stemmle article in CineGraph—Lexikon zum deutschsprachigen Film [Munich: edition text+kritik, 1984ff.; online at: http://www.filmportal.de; last access July 13, 2006]). Neumann had begun his career in different Berlin cabarets in the late 1920s. After 1933, he continued to work in the now heavily censored cabaret sector until 1937, repeatedly getting into trouble with the NS authorities for individual productions (see Bryan T. VanSweringen, Kabarettist an der Front des Kalten Krieges. Günter Neumann und das politische Kabarett in der Programmgestaltung des RIAS 1948–1968, trans. Regine Schulze [Passau: Wiss.Verlag Rothe, 1989], here pp.45–58).
Directed by Kurt Hoffmann (UFA). On this film, see Cary Nathenson: “Fear of Flying: Education to Manhood in Nazi Film Comedies: Glückskinder and Quax, der Bruchpilot,” Cultural History through a National Socialist Lens: Essays on the Cinema of the Third Reich, ed. Robert C. Reimer (Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2000), pp.84–108;
on the problematic entertainment—ideology distinction in general Eric Rentschler, The Ministry of Illusion: Nazi Cinema and its Afterlife (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996);
Lutz Koepnick, The Dark Mirror: German Cinema between Hitler and Hollywood (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002).
See Hayden White, “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality,” in The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990).
Laura Mulvey, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” in Screen 16.3 (1975): 6–18;
see Tom Gunning, “The Cinema of Attractions: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde,” in Early Cinema: Space—Frame—Narrative, ed. Thomas Elsaesser with Adam Barker (London: British Film Institute, 1990), pp.56–62, and, for example, Classical Hollywood Comedy, ed. Kristine Brunovska Karnick and Henry Jenkins (New York: Routledge, 1995).
Sergei Eisenstein, “The Montage of Film Attractions,” in The European Cinema Reader, ed. Catherine Fowler (London: Routledge, 2002), pp.25–26.
Sarah Kozloff, Invisible Storytellers: Voice-Over Narration in American Fiction Film (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988), p.23.
See Terri J. Gordon, “Fascism and the Female Form: Performance Art in the Third Reich,” in Journal of the History of Sexuality 11.1/2 (January/April 2002): 164–200.
For an overview see, for example, Hans Dollinger, Friedrich II. von Preußen: Sein Bild im Wandel von zwei Jahrhunderten (München: List, 1986), pp.193–216.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2008 Wilfried Wilms and William Rasch
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Breger, C. (2008). “Kampf dem Kampf”: Aesthetic Experimentation and Social Satire in The Ballad of Berlin . In: Wilms, W., Rasch, W. (eds) German Postwar Films. Studies in European Culture and History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616974_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616974_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37504-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61697-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)