Abstract
This chapter, which provides a historical and chronological overview of the evolution of women’s studies over the past 40 years, is meant to provide context for the reflections that follow. Divided by each of the decades, it is not meant to be an exhaustive history of women’s studies but rather a “snapshot” of how the field evolved as it interacted with issues in the women’s liberation movement, American politics, and social change, as well as in the academy itself.
Can we conceive of a future in which oppositional gender categories are not fundamental to one’s self-concept?
(Alcoff, 1988, 287)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aiken, S., K. Anderson, M. Dinnerstein, J. Lensink, and P. MacCorquadale. (1988). Changing our minds: Feminist transformations of knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Alcoff, L. (1988). “Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism.” In E. Minnich, J. O’Barr, and R. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Reconstructing the academy: Women’s education and women’s studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 257–288.
American Association of University Women (AAUW). (1992). How schools shortchange girls. Washington, DC: Joint publication of the American Association of University Women and the National Educational Association.
American Association of University Women (AAUW). (1999). Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. New York: Marlowe and Company.
Arenal E. (2002). “Implications and articulations: The Ph.D. in Women’s Studies.” Women’s Studies Quarterly, 30 (3 and 4): 179–192.
Belenky, M.F., B.M. Clinchy, N.R. Goldberger, and J.M. Tarule. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
Bowles G. (2000). “From the bottom up: The students’ initiative.” In F. Howe (Ed.), The politics of Women’s Studies. New York: The Feminist Press, 142–154.
Bowles G. (2002). “Continuity and change in Women’s Studies.” In R. Weigman (Ed.), Women’s Studies on its own. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 457–464.
Boxer, M. (1988). “For and about women: The theory and practice of Women’s Studies in the United States.” In, E. Minnich, J.F. O’Barr, and R. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Reconstructing the academy: Women’s education and Women’s Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 69–103.
Boxer, M. (2001). When women ask the questions: Creating Women’s Studies in America. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Brazin, N.T. (2000). “The gender revolution.” In F. Howe (Ed.), The Politics of Women’s Studies. New York: The Feminist Press, 57–68.
Cocks, J. (1985). “Suspicious pleasures: On teaching feminist theory.” In M. Cully and C. Portuges (Eds.), Gendered subjects: The dynamics of feminist teaching. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 171–194.
Cole, J. (2000). “The long road through gendered questions.” In F. Howe (Ed.), The politics of Women’s Studies. New York: The Feminist Press, 327–333.
Davis, D.R. (2007). “A new wave, shifting ground: Women’s Studies PhDs and the feminist academy from the perspective of 1998.” In H. Aikau, K. Erickson, and J. Pierce (Eds.), Feminist waves/feminist generations: Life stories from the academy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 270–289.
Dinnerstein, Myra. (2000). “A political education.” In F. Howe (Ed.), The politics of Women’s Studies. New York: The Feminist Press, 291–305.
Du Bois, B. (1983). “Passionate scholarship: Notes on values, knowing and method in feminist social science.” In G. Bowles and R.D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of Women’s Studies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 105–116.
Farley, T.P. (2000). “Changing signs.” In F. Howe (Ed.), The politics of Women’s Studies. New York: The Feminist Press, 264–275.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ginsberg, A., J. Shapiro, and S. Brown. (2004). Gender in urban education: Strategies for student achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Guy-Sheftell, B. (2000). “Our mothers of Women’s Studies.” In F. Howe (Ed.), The politics of Women’s Studies. New York: The Feminist Press, 216–226.
Hooks, B. (1997). “Feminism: A movement to end sexist oppression.” In S. Kemp and J. Squires (Eds.), Feminisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 22–27.
Howe, F. (1997). “The first ten years are the easiest.” Women’s Studies Quarterly, 25 (1 and 2): 23–33.
Jolles, M. (2007). “‘Real women’ in Women’s Studies: A reflective look at the theory/practice dilemma.” Feminist Teacher, 18 (2): 74–85.
Lorber, J. (2005). Breaking the bowls: Degendering and feminist change. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Macdonald, A. (2002). “Feminist pedagogy and the appeal to epistemic privilege.” In A. Macdonald, and S. Casal (Eds.), Twenty first century classrooms: Pedagogies of identity and difference. New York: Palgrave, 111–133.
May, V. (2005). “Disciplining feminist futures?: ‘Undisciplined’ reflections about the Women’s Studies Ph.D.” In E. Kennedy and A. Beins (Eds.), Women’s Studies for the future: Foundations, interrogations, politics. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 185–206.
Musil, C. (1992). The courage to question. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and National Women’s Studies Association.
O’Barr, J.F. (1994). Feminism in action: Building institutions & community through Women’s Studies. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Rabinowitz, N. (2002). “Queer theory and feminist pedagogy.” In A. Macdonald and S. Casal (Eds.), Twenty first century classrooms: Pedagogies of identity and difference. New York: Palgrave, (175–200).
Research for action. 1996. Girls in the middle: Working to succeed in school. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Foundation.
Robinson, Jean. (2002). “From politics to professionalism: Cultural change in women’s studies.” In R. Weigman (Ed.), Women’s Studies on its own. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 202–210.
Rose, E.C. (1998). “This class meets in cyberspace: Women’s Studies via distance education.” In G. Cohee, E. Daumer, T. Kemp, P. Krebs, S. Lafky, and S. Runzo (Eds.), The feminist teacher anthology: Pedagogies and classroom strategies. New York: Teachers College Press, 114–132.
Sadker, M. and Sadker D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America’s schools cheat girls. New York: A Touchstone Book.
Scott, J. (1990). “Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism.” In M. Hirsch and E.F. Keller (Eds.), Conflicts in feminism. New York and London: Routledge, 134–148.
Silver, L. (1992). “Oberlin college: Self-empowerment and difference.” In K. Musil (Ed.), The courage to question. Association of American Colleges and National Women’s Studies Association, 157–177.
Weigman, R. (2002). Women’s Studies on its own. Durham and London: Duke University.
Weskott, M. (2002). “Institutional success and political vulnerability: A lesson in the importance of allies.” In R. Weigman (Ed.), Women’s Studies on its own. Durham and London: Duke University, 293–311.
Whitehouse, P. (2002). “Women’s Studies online: An oxymoron?” Women’s Studies Quarterly, 30 (3 and 4): 209–225.
Zimmerman, B. (2005). “Beyond dualisms: Some thoughts about the future of Women’s Studies.” In E.L. Kennedy and A. Beins (Eds.), Women’s Studies for the future. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 31–39.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2008 Alice E. Ginsberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ginsberg, A.E. (2008). Triumphs, Controversies, and Change: Women’s Studies 1970s to the Twenty-First Century. In: Ginsberg, A.E. (eds) The Evolution of American Women’s Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616677_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616677_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37313-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61667-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)