Advertisement

Limits of Shareholder Value to Achieving Global Sustainability

Chapter

Overview

It is often argued that sustainability and shareholder value are not in conflict with each other but that the goal of sustainable development is in line with the goal of maximizing shareholder value. Using our sustainable value approach we show that corporate sustainability performance can be measured in monetary terms, that sustainability and shareholder value can be in line, but that there is no unambiguous link between the two. Using our database of sustainable value calculations, we give examples of companies that create shareholder value and contribute positively to sustainable development as well as of companies that create shareholder value at the expense of sustainable development. This chapter both provides a methodological approach and makes an empirical contribution to the theory of sustainable development.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Social Capital Social Performance Economic Performance Total Asset 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bastiat, F. 1870. Ce qu’on voit et ce qu’on ne voit pas. In Oeuvres complètes de Frédérick Bastiat, mises en ordre, revues et annotées d’après les manuscrits de l’auteur, ed. F. Bastiat, 3rd ed., vol. 5, pp. 336–392. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
  2. Berkhout, P. H. G., Muskens, J. C., and Velthuijsen, J. W. 2000. Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy 28 (6–7): 425–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumberg, J., Korsvold, Å., and Blum, G. 1997. Environmental performance and shareholder value. Geneva: WBCSD.Google Scholar
  4. Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., and Allen, F. 2008. Principles of corporate finance. 9th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Bughin, J., and Copeland, T. E. 1997. The virtuous cycle of shareholder value creation. The McKinsey Quarterly (2): 156–167.Google Scholar
  6. Chambers, N., and Lewis, K. 2001. Ecological footprint analysis: Towards a sustainability indicator for business. London: The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.Google Scholar
  7. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., and Vasvari, F. P. 2007. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society. (In press, corrected proof.)Google Scholar
  8. Copeland, T. E., Koller, T., and Murrin, J. 2000. Valuation. Measuring and managing the value of companies. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley amp; Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387 (May): 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dyllick, T., and Hockerts, K. 2002. Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 11 (2): 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Figge, F. 2000. Öko-Rating. Ökologieorientierte Bewertung von Unternehmen. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Figge, F. 2001. Environmental value added: Ein neues Maß zur Messung der Öko-Effizienz. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Umweltforschung 14 (1–4): 184–197.Google Scholar
  13. Figge, F. 2005. Value-based environmental management. From environmental share-holder value to environmental option value. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12 (1): 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Figge, F., and Hahn, T. 2004a. Sustainable value added: Measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics 48 (2): 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Figge, F., and Hahn, T. 2004b. Value-oriented impact assessment: The economics of a new approach to impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47 (6): 921–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Figge, F., and Hahn, T. 2005. The cost of sustainability capital and the creation of sustainable value by companies. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9 (4): 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Figge, F., and Hahn, T. 2008. Sustainable investment analysis with the Sustainable Value Approach: A plea and a methodology to overcome the instrumental bias in socially responsible investment research. Progress in Industrial Ecology 5 (3): 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greening, L. A., Greene, D. L., and Difiglio, C. 2000. Energy efficiency and consumption: The rebound effect—a survey. Energy Policy 28 (6–7): 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hahn, T., Figge, F., and Barkemeyer, R. 2007. Sustainable Value creation among companies in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management 7 (5/6): 496–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hart, S. L., and Milstein, M. B. 2003. Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive 17 (2): 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harte, M. J. 1995. Ecology, sustainability, and environment as capital. Ecological Economics 1995 (15): 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herendeen, R. A. 1998. Monetary-costing environmental services: Nothing is lost, something is gained. Ecological Economics 25 (1): 29–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krajnc, D., and Glavic, P. 2005. How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability. Ecological Economics 55 (4): 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Labuschagne, C., Brent, A. C., and Van Erck, R. P. G. 2005. Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production 13 (4): 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21 (5): 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., and Narasimhan, R. 2007. An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management 25 (5): 998–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neumayer, E. 1999. Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Prugh, T., Costanza, R., Cumberland, J. H., Daly, H. E., Goodland, R., and Norgaard, R. B. 1999. Natural capital and human economic survival. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Lewis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rappaport, A. 1986. Creating shareholder value. The new standard for business performance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Reinhardt, F. 1999. Market failure and the environmental policies of firms. Economic rationales for “beyond compliance” behavior. Journal of Industrial Ecology 3 (1): 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Repetto, R., and Austin, D. 2001. Quantifying the impact of corporate environmental performance on shareholder value. Environmental Quality Management 10 (4): 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richmond, A., Kaufmann, R. K., and Myneni, R. B. 2007. Valuing ecosystem services: A shadow price for net primary production. Ecological Economics 64 (2): 454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rowley, T., and Berman, S. 2000. A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business amp; Society 39 (4): 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidt-Bleek, F., and Weaver, P. 1998. Factor 10. Manifesto for a sustainable planet. Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  35. Stern, D. I. 1997. The capital theory approach to sustainability: A critical appraisal. Journal of Economic Issues, 31 (1): 145–173.Google Scholar
  36. Szekely, F., and Knirsch, M. 2005. Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal 23 (6): 628–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vafeas, N., Nikolaou, V., and Cheryl, R. L. 2001. The association between corporate environmental and financial performance. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 8: 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Passel, S., Nevens, F., Mathijs, E., and Van Huylenbroeck, G. 2007. Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency. Ecological Economics 62 (1): 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wackernagel, M., and Rees, W. E. 1996. Our ecological footprint. Reducing human impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society.Google Scholar
  40. Warne, F. J. 1919. Corporation finance and the wage worker. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 85 (1): 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whitaker, A. C. 1904. History and criticism of the labor theory of value in English political economy. Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Charles Wankel and James A. F. Stoner 2008

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations