Advertisement

“SOAR” from the Mediocrity of Status Quo to the Heights of Global Sustainability

Chapter
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

A letter written by Walter Isaacson, the president of the Aspen Institute, a nongovernmental organization (NGO), to Aspen friends and partners reads

At certain points in our lives, many of us feel the need to reflect on what it takes to lead a life that is good, useful, worthy, and meaningful. Perhaps we have noticed ourselves trimming our principles and making too many compromises in our careers, and we want to reconnect with our values. Or perhaps we yearn, in a world filled with clashing opinions, to understand the great ideas and ideals that have competed throughout the progress of civilization.

(Isaacson 2006)

Keywords

Sustainable Development Strategic Management Stakeholder Theory Strategic Change Management Executive 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amason, A. 1996. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal 39 (1): 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Astley, W. G., and Van de Ven, A. H. 1983. Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (2): 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BAWB: Business as an Agent of World Benefit. 2005. http://worldbenefit.cwru.edu/ (accessed January 7, 2007).
  4. Boeker, W. 1997. Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal 40 (1): 152–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke, W., and Trhant, W. 2000. Business climate shifts: Profiles of change makers. Woburn, MA: PriceWaterhouseCoopers.Google Scholar
  6. de Kluyver, C., and Pearce, J. 2006. Strategy: A view from the top. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Dean, J. W., and Sharfman, M. 1996. Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal 39 (2): 368–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dechant, K., and Altman, B. 1994. Environmental leadership: From compliance to competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive 8 (3): 7–20.Google Scholar
  9. Freeman, R. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
  10. Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review 24 (2): 191–205.Google Scholar
  11. Gladwin, T., Kennelly, J. and Krause, T. 1995. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review 20 (4): 874–907.Google Scholar
  12. Griffiths, A., and Petrick, J. A. 2001. Corporate architectures for sustainability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 21 (12): 1573–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamel, G., and Prahalad, C. K. 1996. Competing in the New Economy: Managing out of bounds. Strategic Management Journal 17 (3): 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hart, S. L., and Milstein, M. B. 2003. Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive 17 (2): 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hawken, P. 1993. Ecology of commerce. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  16. Hitt, M. A., and Tyler, B. B. 1991. Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 12 (5): 327–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holeman, P., Devane, T., and Cady, S. 2006. The change handbook. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  18. Holliday, C. 2001. Sustainable growth, the DuPont way. Harvard Business Review 79 (8): 129–132.Google Scholar
  19. Hutzschenreuter, T., and Kleindienst, I. 2006. Strategy-process research: What have we learned and what is still to be explored. Journal of Management 32 (5): 673–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Interface Sustainability. 2006. http://www.interfacesustainability.com/seven.html (accessed December 17, 2006).
  21. Isaacson, W. 2006. Letter from the President. http://www.aspeninstitute.org/site/c.huLWJeMRKpH/b.493947/k.7AC3/About_the_Aspen_Institute.htm (accessed December 14, 2006).Google Scholar
  22. Jones, T., Felps, W., and Bigley, G. 2007. Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review 32 (1): 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanter, R. 2004. Confidence: How winning streaks and losing streaks begin and end. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  24. Kassinis, G. I., and Vafeas, N. 2006. Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal 49 (1): 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leach, J., and Moon, J. 2004. Pitch perfect. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Lewin, R., and Regine, B. 2000. The soul at work: Listen… Respond… Let go. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  27. McCarthy, D. J. 2000. View from the top: Henry Mintzberg on strategy and management. Academy of Management Executive 14 (3): 31–39.Google Scholar
  28. Murali, D. 2004, September 16. Momentum is the fuel that drives strategy into action. The Hindu Business Line (Internet edition), http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/catalyst/2004/09/16/stories/2004091600200200.htm (accessed February 19, 2008).Google Scholar
  29. Nutt, P. C. 1999. Surprising but true: Half the decisions in organizations fail. Academy of Management Executive 13 (4): 75–90.Google Scholar
  30. Phillips, R. A. 1997. Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (1): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rainey, M. A. 1996. An appreciative inquiry into the factors of culture continuity during leadership transition: A case study of Lead Share, Canada. OD Practitioner 28 (1&2): 34–41.Google Scholar
  32. Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., and Ragan, J. W. 1986. Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal 29 (1): 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shrivastava, P. 1995. The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review 20 (4): 936–960.Google Scholar
  34. Stavros, J., Cooperrider, D., and Kelley, D. 2003. Strategic inquiry Appreciative intent: Inspiration to SOAR. AI Practitioner (November), 2–19.Google Scholar
  35. Suntop Media Thinkers 50. 2007. The Thinkers Top 50. http://www.thinkers50.com (accessed January 9, 2007).
  36. Sustainable Development Commission. 2006. I will if you will: Towards sustainable development. http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/pages/publicationstop10.html (accessed January 2, 2007).Google Scholar
  37. Sustainable South Bronx 2008. http://www.ssbx.org/greenway.html (accessed February 22, 2008).
  38. Thomas, H., Pollock, T., and Gorman, P. 1999. Global strategic analyses: Frameworks and approaches. Academy of Management Executive 13 (1): 70–82.Google Scholar
  39. Thompson, A., and Strickland, A. 2005. Crafting and executing strategy. New York City, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Thompson, J. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Waddock, S. A., Bodwell, C. B., and Graves, S. 2002. Responsibility: The new organization imperative. Academy of Management Executive 16 (2): 132–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. WBCSD: World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2007. http://www.wbcsd.org (accessed January 9, 2007).
  43. Wheelen, T., and Hunger, J. 2006. Strategic management and organization policy. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Charles Wankel and James A. F. Stoner 2008

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations