Skip to main content

The Aesthetics of Laughter

  • Chapter
Chaucerian Aesthetics

Part of the book series: The New Middle Ages ((TNMA))

  • 28 Accesses

Abstract

Everyone knows that many of Chaucer’s tales are funny; moreover, the frequent appearance of the paired terms “ernest and game” and “sentence and solace” suggests that their author knows that he and his created pilgrims are playing weighty and hilarious language games simultaneously. The presiding Host knows about the potential for “sooth” in “game and pley” and says so to the Cook (I.4355). Everyone also knows how complex the related, but not synonymous terms, laughter, humor, comedy, satire, and parody have been and still are. This chapter does not set out to untangle the scholarly debates about these categories, but looks instead at the breadth and inclusiveness of Chaucer’s distinctive humor and the aesthetic effects it evokes. It deals only with the Canterbury Tales (and relatively few of them) because I want to concentrate on comic forms, and Troilus and Criseyde, although it can be characterized in several genres, does not seem to me to qualify as comic in its generic shape. Both it and nearly all the Tales are marked, of course, by sporadic humor. For example, Cecile, on the verge of martyrdom, answers Almachius with a zinger: your vaunted power over life and death is only the power to kill, not quicken (Second Nun’s Tale [VIII.482–83]), which seems just the sudden swerve from normal expectation that identifies wit. Comment on these occasional sparks are also absent from this chapter—there are too many to do them proper justice.

The game, one would like to say, has not only rules but also a point.

Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

Humour is a phenomenon caused by sudden pouring of culture into Barbary.

Ezra Pound, “D’artagnan Twenty Years After

As speech is the culmination of a mental activity, laughter is a culmination of a feeling—the crest of a wave of felt vitality.

Susanne Langer, Feeling and Form

The world can never take a holiday from metaphysical first principles.

Even the raving, bolted in their cells, have not the files to file these chains away.

Gladys Schmitt, Sonnets for an Analyst

A man may seye ful sooth in game and pley.

Harry Bailly

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. De Bolla, Art Matters (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), pp. 95–96.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mark Miller, “Naturalism and Its Discontents in the Miller’s Tale,” in Philosophical Chaucer: Love, Sex, and Agency in the Canterbury Tales. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literatu no returnre. Ser. 55 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The weasel in some medieval bestiaries conceived through the ear and was therefore associated with Mary’s virginity. See Joseph D. Parry, “Female Agency in the Miller’s Tale and the Merchant’s Tale,” PQ 80 (2001): 147.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morton Bloomfield, “The Miller’s Tale—An UnBoethian Interpretation,” in Medieval Literature and Folklore Studies: Essays in Honor of Francis Lee Utley, ed. Jerome Mandel and Bruce A. Rosenberg (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1970), pp. 205–12. Kolve, Imagery of Narrative, p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  5. O’Brien, “‘Ars-Metrik’: Science, Satire, and Chaucer’s Summoner,” Mosaic 23 (1990): 2, 4, and 8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alan Levitan, “The Parody of Pentecost in Chaucer’s Summoner’s Tale,” UTQ 40 (1971): 236–46

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. A. Kolve, “Chaucer’s Wheel of False Religion: Theology and Obscenity in ‘The Summoner’s Tale,’” in The Centre and Its Compass: Studies in Medieval Literature in Honor of Professor John Leyerle, ed. Robert A. Taylor, et al. (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. John V. Flemming, “The Summoner’s Prologue: An Iconographic Adjustment,” Chaucer Review 2 (1967): 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee Patterson, “‘What Man Artow?’: Authorial Self-Definition in The Tale of Sir Thopas and The Tale of Melibee,” Studies in the Ages of Chaucer 11 (1989): 124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Peggy A. Knapp

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knapp, P.A. (2008). The Aesthetics of Laughter. In: Chaucerian Aesthetics. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230613843_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics