Advertisement

Re-Enfleshing the Bright Boys; or, How Male Bodies Might Matter to Feminist Theory

Chapter
  • 136 Downloads

Abstract

The proliferation of masculinity studies in the 1990s was viewed with understandable suspicion by some—probably most—feminist theorists. Such studies were seen as integral to, if not responsible for, a critical and institutional shift away from a specifically feminist project and toward what was considered a politically neutralized “gender studies.” On this view, the argument that men are no less gendered than women, that masculinity is no less a, social construction or performative masquerade than is femininity, is complicit with the blithe assumption that men and women are equally installed into symmetrically “gendered” positions. This assumption of equal or symmetrical gendering, supposedly inscribed in the phrase “no less” above, would obviously evacuate the feminist argument that the social and symbolic processes of gendering sexed bodies, of sexuating human organisms, produce and maintain unequal and asymmetrical relations of power. Masculinity studies and the “turn to gender” were thus charged with perpetuating rather than interrogating the reproduction of systemic male dominance.

Keywords

Symbolic Order Linguistic Difference Queer Theory Feminist Project Lacanian Psychoanalysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Calvin Thomas 2008

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations