Skip to main content
  • 52 Accesses

Abstract

The end of the Cold War, globalization, and partisanship have all contributed to changing the way foreign policy is made. When the Cold War ended, the basic consensus about the purpose of foreign policy was eliminated, and any number of definitions of the national interest became possible. Since the survival of the United States is no longer at stake, those definitions now have more to do with the interests of the people making them than with the interests of the nation as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Nolan McCarty, Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal, Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas E. Mann and Norman J. Ornstein, The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Morris P. Fiorina, Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America, 1st ed. (White Plains, NY: Longman, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gary C. Jacobson, A Divider, Not a Uniter: George W. Bush and the American People, 1st ed. (White Plains, NY: Longman, 2007), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benjamin Page and Marshall Bouton, The Foreign Policy Disconnect: What Americans Want for Our Leaders but Don’t Get (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., War and the American Presidency (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2004), p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ann Coulter, Godless: The Church of Liberalism (New York: Crown Forum, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee H. Hamilton and Jordan Tama, A Creative Tension: The Foreign Policy Roles of the President and Congress (Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2002), p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rebecca K. C. Hersman, Friends and Foes: How Congress and the President Really Make Foreign Policy (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2000), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tony Smith, Foreign Attachments: The Power of Ethnic Groups in the Making of American Foreign Policy, 1st ed. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morton H. Halperin and Prisilla A. Clapp, Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy, 2nd ed. (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2006), p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alexander George, Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy (Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1993), p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joseph Lepgold and Miroslav Nincic, Beyond the Ivory Tower (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Dennis C. Jett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jett, D.C. (2008). How It Really Works. In: Why American Foreign Policy Fails. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230611771_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics