Advertisement

Manchukuo and the Dream of Pan-Asia

  • Eri Hotta
Chapter
  • 332 Downloads
Part of the The Palgrave Macmillan Series in Transnational History book series (PMSTH)

Abstract

Owing to a burgeoning body of sophisticated historical works, it has become almost a cliché to say that Manchukuo was an imperialist creation of a unique brand. By addressing the relevance and particularity of Manchukuo in various fields of imperialism as well as transnational and sovereignty studies that transcend the simple nation-state matrix, the authors of some of the most important works on Manchukuo have enhanced our understanding of this nation- and state-building (kenkoku) enterprise. To draw attention to only the illustrative few, Louise Young has put forward her seminal thesis of a “total empire” to explain the comprehensive manner of Japanese mobilization for Manchukuo. In her study, as a methodology and a description of a phenomenon in itself, the term “total empire” is proposed as a parallel term to “total war.”1 Like total war, total empire was made on the home front, entailing multidimensional mobilization of the Japanese nation in all cultural, military, political, and economic endeavors. In her view, Manchukuo signifies not only a military conquest, but also a vast socio-politico-cultural project that represented Japan’s modern efficiency expressed in the forms of Manchukuo’s cosmopolitan cities and agricultural settlements.

Keywords

Japanese Imperialism Military Police High Moral Ground Chinese Nationalism Japanese Nation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Louise Young, Japan’s Total Empire: Manchuria and the Culture of Wartime Imperialism. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), 13.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rana Mitter, The Manchurian Myth: Nationalism, Resistance, and Collaboration in Modern China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peter Duus, introduction to The Japanese Informal Empire in China, 1895–1937, eds. Peter Duus, Ramon H. Myers, and Mark R. Peattie (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989), xviii.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    “Nichiman Giteisho” [The Japanese-Manchukuo Protocol], September 15, 1932, in Rekishigaku Kenkyūkai, ed., Nihonshi Shiryō, [5] Gendai [Sources on Japanese History, Volume 5, Modern Period] (Iwanami Shoten, 1997), 16.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Matsusaka, “Managing Occupied Manchuria,” in The Japanese Wartime Empire, 1931–1945, eds. Peter Duus, Ramon H. Myers, and Mark R. Peattie (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996), 96–97.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Ishiwara Kanji, Manshūkoku Kenkoku to Shina Jihen [The Establishment of Manchukuo and the China Incident] (Kyoto: Tōa Renmei Kyōkai, 1940), 30–32. For the impact of Yu on Ishiwara’s Pan-Asianist sensibilities, seeGoogle Scholar
  7. Yamamuro Shin’ichi. Kimera: Manshūkoku no Shōzō [Chimera: A Portrait of Manchukuo] (Chuō Kōronsha, 1993), 83–99. On how Yu drew Japanese attention to the concept, see Mitter, 94–95, andGoogle Scholar
  8. Prasenjit Duara, Sovereignty and Authenticity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), 64–65.Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    Joshua A. Fogel, Politics and Sinology: The Case of Naito Konan (1866–1934) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  10. 20.
    See Susan C. Townsend, “Chapter 9: The Yanaihara Incident,” in Yanaihara Tadao and Japanese Colonial Policy: Redeeming Empire (Richmond, Surrey: Curzon, 2000), 228–56.Google Scholar
  11. 21.
    Yanaihara Tadao, “Manshū Kenbundan” [Discussion on Manchurian Observations], Kaizō (November 1932): 107.Google Scholar
  12. 23.
    For the analysis of the highly charged romanticism among Youth League activists, see Matsumoto Ken’ichi, “Ozawa Kaisaku no Yume” [Ozawa Kaisaku’s Dream] in Shōwa ni Shisu: Morisaki Minato to Ozawa Kaisaku [Dying alongside Shōwa: Morisaki Minato and Ozawa Kaisaku] (Shinchosha, 1988), 117–87.Google Scholar
  13. 26.
    Mariko Asano Tamanoi, “Knowledge, Power, and Racial Classifications: The ‘Japanese’ in ‘Manchuria,’” The Journal of Asian Studies 59, no. 2 (May 2000): 248–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 28.
    Marius B. Jansen, The Making of Modern Japan (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000), 589.Google Scholar
  15. 29.
    See Takafusa Nakamura, “Depression, Recovery, and War, 1920–1945,” in The Cambridge History of Japan: Vol. 6, The Twentieth Century, ed. Peter Duus, trans. Jacqueline Kaminsky (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 475, and Young, Japan’s Total Empire, 196–97.Google Scholar
  16. 31.
    For Miyazaki’s life, see Kobayashi Hideo, “Nihon Kabushiki Gaisha” wo Tsukutta Otoko — Miyazaki Masayoshi no Shōgai [The Man Who Made “Japan Corporation”—Life of Miyazaki Masayoshi] (Shōgakukan, 1995).Google Scholar
  17. 32.
    Taiheiyō Sensō Kenkyūkai, ed., Manshū Teikoku (Kawade Shobō, 1996), 109.Google Scholar
  18. 34.
    Tachibana Shiraki, “Watashi no Hokotenkan” [My Change in Direction], Manshu Hyoron, August 11, 1934, 32–33.Google Scholar
  19. 40.
    Akira Iriye, Cultural Internationalism and World Order (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997), 120.Google Scholar
  20. 41.
    Hochi Takayuki, Harubin Gakuin to Manshūkoku [The Harbin Academy and Manchukuo] (Shinchō Sensho, 1999), 128, and Yasuhiko Yoshikazu, “Manshu Kenkoku Daigaku no Seishun” [The Youths of Manshū Kenkoku Daigaku], Marco Polo (February 2, 1994): 57.Google Scholar
  21. 43.
    Extrapolated from ibid. More specific data available in Manshū Rōkōkai, ed., Manshū Rōdō Nenkan [Manchurian Labor Yearbook] (Ganshōdō, 1940 edition, published in 1941), 62–65.Google Scholar
  22. 50.
    Yamaguchi Yoshiko and Fujiwara Sakuya, Ri Kōran, Watashi no Hansei [Li Xianglan, My Life So Far] (Shinchōsha, 1987), 109–11.Google Scholar
  23. 54.
    Hiroshi Saito, “My Impressions in the Far East and Japanese-American Relations,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 177 (January 1935), 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 56.
    Aishinkakura Hiro, Ruten no ōhi no Shōwashi [Shōwa History of a Wandering Princess] (Shinchōsha, 1984), and Aishinkakura Fuketsu, Fuketsu Jiden. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eri Hotta 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eri Hotta

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations