Skip to main content

Iran: Nuclear High Tension and Holocaust Polemics

  • Chapter
  • 101 Accesses

Abstract

The United States and Iran appear to be engaged in a high stakes and dangerous game of post-cold war “brinkmanship” that could either result in some form of compromise or else continue to degenerate into a further escalation of tensions, if not direct conflict. In accord with traditional hawkish strategy, the Pentagon has attempted to make the threat of war as credible as possible in order to press Tehran to make concessions.

Keywords

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Security Council
  • Nuclear Weapon
  • Bush Administration
  • Gulf Cooperation Council

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-0-230-10871-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. P. R. Kumaraswamy, “China, Russia on Road to Abandoning Iran,” ISN Security Watch, January 10, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. UN Resolution 1747 focuses on constraining Iranian arms exports, the state-owned Bank Sepah—already under Treasury Department sanctions—and the Revolutionary Guard Corps, which is an elite military organization separate from the nation’s conventional armed forces. Thom Schanker, “Security Council Votes to Tighten Iran Sanctions,” New York Times, March 25, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ariana Eunjung Cha, “China Embraces Nuclear Future,” Washington Post, May 29, 2007, http://wwwwashingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2007/05/28/AR200705 2801051_pf.html;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benjamin K. Sovacool, “Think Again: Nuclear Energy,” Foreign Policy (September 2005). http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?Story_id=3250&print=1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kamal Nazer Yasin, “Iran: The Geostrategy of Oil,” ISN Security Watch (July 18, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richard Betts, “The Osirak Fallacy,” The National Interest (Spring 2006). In a report allegedly leaked to embarrass Germany, revealing major German, U.S., UK, and Chinese firms purportedly involved in Saddam’s nuclear program, see The Guardian (December 18, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nazila Fathi, David E. Sanger, and William J. Broad, “Iran Says It Is Making Nuclear Fuel, Defying U.N.,” New York Times, April 12, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. David E. Sanger, William J. Broad, “Iran Expanding Nuclear Effort, Agency Reports,” New York Times, February 22, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. William O. Beeman, “After Ahmadinejad: the Prospects for US-Iranian Relations,” in Iranian Challenges, ed. Walter Posch, Chaillot paper, 89 (May 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conn Hallinan, “The Democrats & Iran,” (December 9, 2006) Foreign Policy in Focus, http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/3771.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lisa Bryant, “France Defends Talk with Iran on Nuclear Fuel,” Reuters, February 4, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. K. Bhadrakumar, “China, Russia Welcome Iran into the Fold,” Asia Times On Line (April 18, 2006), http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/HD18Ad02.html;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jephraim P. Gundzik, “The Ties That Bind China, Russia, and Iran,” June 4, 2005, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/GF04Ad07.html; http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle East/FK06Ak01.html.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan M. Fattah, “Arab States, Wary of Iran, Add to Their Arsenals but Still Lean on the U.S.,” New York Times, February 23, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meghan Clyne, “Congress Outbids Bush on Iran Democracy Aid,” New York Sun, March 3, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Seymour M. Hersh, “The Iran Plans: Would President Bush Go to War to Stop Tehran from Getting the Bomb?” New Yorker, April 17, 2006 (Posted April 8, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mark Mazzetti and Michael R. Gordon, “Fissures Emerge on Iran’s Role in Iraq Attacks,” International Herald Tribune, February 14, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heather Stewart, “Iran Crisis ‘Could Drive Oil over $90,” The Guardian, January 29, 2006, http://www.guardian.co.uk/oil/story/0„1697137,00.html.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gareth Porter, “Israeli Realism on Iran Belies Threat Rhetoric,” January 30, 2007, http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=36369.

    Google Scholar 

  20. AIPAC Memo “Proceed with Caution If Engaging Iran and Syria” Dec. 6, 2006 http://www.aipac.org/PDFDocs/AIPAC%20Memo%20-%20ProceedWith Caution.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  21. David Albright, “South Africa and the Affordable Bomb,” Bulletin of Atomic Scientists (July/August 1994), http://www.thebulletin.org/article.php?art_ofn=ja94albright.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hassan M. Fattah, “Arab States, Wary of Iran, Add to Their Arsenals but Still Lean on the U.S.,” New York Times, February 23, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hassan Rowhani, Time Magazine, May 11, 2006, cited at Global http://Security.org http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iran/2006/iran-060511-irna01.htm; http://www.parstimes.com/history/un_598.html; http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/line-17/0704106338191059.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Ray Takeyh, “A Nuclear Iran: Challenges and Responses Author: Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies,” March 2, 2006, http://www.cfr.org/publication/10008/nucleariran.html?breadcrumb=default.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Helene Cooper and David E. Sanger, “Iran Strategy Stirs Debate at White House,” Washington Post, June 16, 2007. In addition, General Wesley Clark rebuked Senator Lieberman’s public call to pursue Iranian forces across Iraq’s border: “What we need now is full-fledged engagement with Iran…. All options are on the table, but we should be striving to bridge the gulf of almost 30 years of hostility before, and only when all else fails should there be any consideration of other options. … Only someone who never wore the uniform or thought seriously about national security would make threats at this point … What our soldiers need is responsible strategy, not a further escalation of tensions in the region.” Gen. Wesley Clark Slams Senator Lieberman on Iran Newsmax (June 13, 2007) http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/6/13/203112.shtml?s=ic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Hall Gardner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gardner, H. (2007). Iran: Nuclear High Tension and Holocaust Polemics. In: Averting Global War. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230608733_5

Download citation