Skip to main content

Gender, Race, and Sexuality in the American Christian Right

  • Chapter
Women & Others

Part of the book series: Signs of Race ((SOR))

Abstract

There’s no question that white evangelical Protestants, especially in the South, were not only on the sidelines but were on the wrong side of the most central struggle for civil justice of the twentieth century, namely the struggle for civil rights …[U]ntil the pro-family, religious conservative movement becomes a truly biracial or multi-racial movement, it will not have moral resonance with the American people, because we were so wrong at that time. I want the Christian Coalition to be a truly rainbow coalition. I want it to be black, brown, yellow, white. I want it to bring Christians of all faith traditions, all denominations, and all races and colors together. I don’t think that’s going to happen over night. It’s going to take years, but we’re committed to it.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Quoted in William Martin, With God on Our Side (New York: Pantheon Books, 1996), 365–66.

    Google Scholar 

  2. There are many definitions of the Christian Right in circulation. For purposes of this paper, I define the Christian right as evangelical Christians who tend toward conservative politics (although they may disagree about the extent to which they think they should engage in politics). By “evangelical,” I refer primarily to Protestants who generally subscribe to the five fundamentals of faith that have served as rallying points for evangelicalism: Biblical inerrancy; deity of Christ; substitutionary atonement; bodily resurrection; and the second coming of Christ. This definition is inclusive of Pentecostals and those groups that do not trace their roots to the fundamentalist/modernist debates of the 1920s. I am not including the more explicitly racist Christian movements, such as Christian identity groups. See Ronald Nash, Evangelicals in America (Nashville: Abingdon, 1987); Edward Dobson, “Standing Together on Absolutes.” United Evangelical Action 44 (September–October 1985): 4–10; William Trollinger “How Should Evangelicals Understand Fundamentalism?” United Evangelical Action 44 (September–October 1985): 7–9; Donald Dayton, The Variety of American Evangelicalism (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1991); Joel Carpenter, Revive Us Again (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997); Harold Ockenga, “From Fundamentalism: Through New Evangelicalism to Evangelicalism,” in Evangelical Roots, ed. K. Kantzer (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishing Company, 1968). In addition, I use the term “Christian Right” loosely, understanding that many evangelicals support conservative politics while not necessarily identifying with the label “Christian Right.” James Guth, “Southern Baptist Clergy: Vanguard of the Christian Right? ” in The New Christian Right, ed. R. Liebman and R. Wuthnow (New York: Aldine, 1983); Christian Smith, Christian America? (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000); Robert Zwier, Born-Again Politics (Downer’s Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1982). The reason such a loose definition is appropriate for this study is that I am demarcating people who take part in a shared community of discourse about politics and religion even if they disagree about whether or not to term themselves members of the “Christian Right.”

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tony Evans, Americas Only Hope (Chicago: Moody Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sheldon King, “We Must Come Together,” New Man 4 (January– February 1997): 24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steve Rabey, “Where Is the Christian Men’s Movement Headed?” Christianity Today 40 (April 29, 1996): 46–49, 60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ted Olsen, “Racial Reconciliation Emphasis Intensified,” Christianity Today 41 (January 6, 1997): 67.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stephen Strang, “Unity of Purpose,” Charisma 20 (January 1995): 110.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beth Spring, “Billy Graham’s Washington Crusade Gains the Support of Black Church Leaders,” Christianity Today 30 (June 13, 1986): 10–11; John W. Kennedy, “Deeper than a Handshake,” Christianity Today 38 (December 12, 1994): 62–63; Ted Olsen, “Lutheran, Catholic, and Black Churches Join Graham Effort,” Christianity Today 40 (July 15, 1996): 67.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Timothy Morgan, “NAE Reinvents Itself,” Christianity Today 38 (April 4, 1994): 87.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wendy Zoba, “Separate and Equal,” Christianity Today 40 (February 6, 1996): 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  11. David Aikman, “Racial Reconciliation,” Charisma 29 (November 2003): 94.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ken Walker, “Vacation Bible School Wars,” Christianity Today 48 (March 2004): 26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Michael Emerson and Christian Smith, Divided by Faith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richard Land, “Questioning Biblical Submission,” Light 6 (November– December 1999): 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lauren Winner, “The Man behind the Megachurch,” Christianity Today 44 (November 13, 2000): 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. Richard Nice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eleanor Smeal, “Promise Keepers Hold No Promise for Women,” (Washington, DC: Fund for Feminist Majority, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mary Stewart Van Leeuwen, “Servanthood or Soft Patriarchy? A Christian Feminist Looks at the Promise Keepers Movement,” Priscilla Papers 11 (Spring): 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  19. James Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance. Similarly, Brenda Brasher contends that this gender flexibility is what allows gender insubordination to remain in place. “To the extent that male pastors are pressed by female congregants to address particular issues rather than redistribute authority in a nonsexist manner pastors are able to maintain an image of being responsive to women’s concerns, thereby destabilizing women’s impetus toward change and retaining congregational authority as a prerogative of males.” Brenda Brasher, Godly Women: Fundamentalism and Female Power (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press., 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. For an important exception, see Linda Kintz’s Between Jesus and the Market (Durham: Duke University Press, 1997). She looks in depth at Christian Right female activists and how their doctrines of female submission promise security for white middle-class women from the destabilization caused by urbanization and multiculturalism. Linda Klintz, Between Jesus and the Market (Durham: Duke University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Marie Griffith, Gods Daughters: Evangelical Women and the Power of Submission (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. As Sara Diamond points out, the frequent appearance of a topic in a community’s periodical literature does not necessarily reflect that community’s priorities. Periodical content depends on many other factors—for example, editors’ and writers’ particular preferences. Nevertheless, this literature is very widely read by conservative Christians. So, while a prevalence of articles on a particular topic may not always reflect the interests of those at the grassroots, it certainly plays a role in determining the future shape of those interests. Sara Diamond, Roads to Dominion (New York: Guilford Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jefferson Edwards, Purging Racism from Christianity (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Joe Maxwell, “Getting Out, Staying Out,” Christianity Today 38 (July 22, 1991): 36.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rodney Cooper, We Stand Together (Chicago: Moody Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  27. “Black Family Betrayed,” Focus on the Family Citizen 15 (February 2001): 24.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rich Jefferson, “The War for Reparations,” Focus on the Family Citizen 15 (February 2001): 25.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stephen Carter, “Hope Deferred,” Christianity Today 48 (July 2004): 64.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Star Parker, Fundraising Letter for Coalition on Urban Affairs (Los Angeles, CA: October 4, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Ronald Nash, Why the Left Is Not Right (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996); “Denominational Leaders Address Drug Crisis,” Christianity Today 34 (November 19, 1990): 58–59; Maxwell, “Getting Out, Staying Out”; Brian Bird, “Christians Who Grow Coca,” Christianity Today 33 (September 8, 1989): 40–43; Bob Lutpon, “How to Create a Ghetto,” World Vision (October–November 1989), 11; Randy Frame, “Helping the Poor Help Themselves,” Christianity Today 41 (February 3, 1997): 70–73; Amy Sherman, “STEP-ing Out on Faith—and Off Welfare,” Christianity Today 40 (June 17, 1996): 35–36; Bill Wilson, “Why I Chose to Live in Hell,” Charisma 22 (October 1996): 55–62; “Teen Sex: Black Youth Leaders for a Solution,” Christianity Today 34 (September 10, 1990): 55; Dan Wooding, “God’s Wake Up Call,” Charisma 19 (July 1994): 29. Wooding implies that no whites are involved in gang activity in Los Angeles, for instance. Passantino wrote an article that was part of a larger collection of articles in Moody on several churches in different communities in the United States. Unlike all the other articles that focused on white communities, the names of the people mentioned in this article were changed “to preserve their dignity.” Gretchen Passantino, “Surviving in the City,” Moody 92 (September 1991): 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Trudy Hutchens, “Is the Church Ready for Welfare Reform?” Family Voice 17 (October 1995): 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Quoted in Michael Lienesch, RedeemingAmerica (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Valerie Lowe, “Stand Up and Be Counted,” Charisma 25 (December 1999): 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  36. David Barton, “The Race Card,” Wallbuilders (Fall 1995): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Andrea Smith, “Bible, Gender and Nationalism in American Indian and Christian Right Activism” (Santa Cruz: University of California-Santa Cruz, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Margaret Bendroth, “The Search for Women’s Role’ in American Evangelicalism, 1930–1980,” Evangelicalism in Modern America, ed. G. Marsden (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1984); Gail Bederman, Manliness and Civilization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Robert Andrescik, “Welcome to the New Men’s Movement,” New Man 7 (September–October 2000): 10; Patrick Morley, “The Next Christian Men’s Movement,” Christianity Today 44 (September 4, 1999): 84–86.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mark Kellner, “Keeping Their Promises,” Christianity Today 44 (May 22, 2000): 21.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Joe Maxwell, “MAB Men Are Back,” New Man 7 (September–October 2000): 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  42. B. Denise Hawkins, “Shoutin’ from the Housetops,” Charisma 20 (June 1995): 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Andres Tapia, “Churches Wary of Inner-City Islamic Inroads,” Christianity Today 39 (January 19, 1994): 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Steve Brouwer, Paul Gifford, and Susan Rose, Exporting the American Gospel (London: Routledge, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kimberle Crenshaw, “The Intersection of Race and Gender,” Critical Race Theory, ed. K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, and K. Thomas (New York: New Press, 1996), 377.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Joe Conason, Alfred Ross, and Lee Cokorinos, “The Promise Keepers Are Coming,” The Nation 263 (October 7, 1996): 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Helen Lee, “Racial Reconciliation Tops NAE’s Agenda,” Christianity Today 39 (April 3, 1995): 97.

    Google Scholar 

  49. J. Lee Grady, “Pentecostals Urged to End Bias against Women Ministers,” Charisma 11 (December 1996): 15.

    Google Scholar 

  50. J. Alfred Smith and Ross Maracle, “Listening to America’s Ethnic Churches,” Christianity Today 33 (March 3, 1989): 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sharon Mumper, “Resettlement Program Could Pave the Way for Outreach Among Indonesian Muslims,” Christianity Today 29 (Marcy 15, 1985): 37, 39; Sharon Mumper, “New Strategies to Evangelize Muslims Gain Effectiveness,” Christianity Today 29 (May 17, 1985): 75–76; Stan Guthrie, “Muslim Mission Breakthrough,” Christianity Today 37 (December 13, 1993): 20–26; Adrian Jacobs, “New Songs and Ways of Worship,” Charisma 18 (July–August 2000): 36; George Houssney, “Persistence Key in Muslim Evangelism,” United Evangelical Action 49 (July–August 1990): 8–9; Stan Guthrie, “A Crescent for a Cross: Islam Prospers in America,” Christianity Today 35 (October 27, 1991): 40; Terry Muck, “The Mosque Next Door” Christianity Today 32 (February 19, 1988): 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Roger Greenway, “A Shift in the Global Center of Christianity,” United Evangelical Action 48 (November–December 1989): 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gary Schipper, “Non-Western Missionaries: Our Newest Challenge.” Evangelical Missions Quarterly 24 (July 1988): 198–202.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Glenn Kendall, “Missionaries Should Not Plant Churches,” Evangelical Missions Quarterly 24 (July 1988): 218–21.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rene Padilla, “Come Holy Spirit—Renew the Whole Creation,” Transformation 8 (October 1991): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Art Toalston, “AD 2000: Eleven Years to Reach the World,” Christianity Today 37 (March 3, 1989): 48, 50.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Concerned Women for America. n.d. Five Critical Trends for Fathers and Families in the New Millennium. Washington, DC: Concerned Women for America. For other racializations of the “problem” of single-female households, see Janice Crouse, Strengthening American Families: What Works and What Doesnt Work (Washington, DC: Concerned Women for America, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Edwin Gausted, A Religious History of America (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1990); Estelle Freedman, Their SistersKeepers (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1981); Betty De Berg, Ungodly Women (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1990); Margaret Bendroth, Fundamentalism and Gender, 1875–Present (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993); Valerie Sherer Mathes, “Nineteenth-Century Women and Reform: The Women’s National Indian Association,” American Indian Quarterly 14 (Winter 1990): 1–18; Wendy Wall, “Gender and the ‘Citizen Indian,’” Writing the Range, ed. E. Jameson and S. Armitage (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Diane Knippers, “Violence, Ideology and Policy,” Faith and Freedom 18 (Winter 1998–1999): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Stephen Strang, “Faith Under Fire,” Charisma 30 (August 2004): 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tanya Green, “Mina’s Story,” Family Voice (Winter 2002): 14–17; 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Elisabeth Farrel, “Married to Muhammed,” Charisma 25 (June 2000): 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ibid., 89.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ibid., 90.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Andree Seu, “Light Switch,” World Magazine 19 (August 14, 2004): 47.

    Google Scholar 

  66. News briefs, Charisma 29 (July 2004): 40.

    Google Scholar 

  67. John Kennedy, “Senate Showdown,” Christianity Today 48 (September 2004): 23.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Alan Chambers, “Do We Want a Gay America?” Charisma 30 (October 2004): 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Gene Edward Veith, “Black & Right,” World Magazine 19 (July 24, 2004): 25.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sheryl Henderson Blunt, “The Man behind the Marriage Amendment,” Christianity Today 48 (September 2004): 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Charles Colson and Anne Morse, “The Moral Home Front,” Christianity Today 48 (October 2004): 152.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Colson and Morse, “The Moral Home Front,” 152. This opinion piece was then criticized by Gary Roth of St. Andrew Lutheran Church in the letters section of Christianity Today. He stated that “blaming gays for broader social problems is like blaming a lesion for our illness when there is cancer throughout the entire body. ‘Gay marriage’ needs to be judged on its own merits (or demerits)—not on fear and suspicion, nor as a scapegoat for idolatries we would rather have go unchallenged.” Readers Write. Christianity Today 48 (April 2004): 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Betsy Hartmann, Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control (Boston: South End Press, 1995); Dorothy Roberts, Killing the Black Body (New York: Pantheon Books, 1997); Jael Silliman and Ynestra King, eds., Dangerous Intersections: Feminist Perspectives on Population, Environment and Development (Boston: South End Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Andrea Smith, Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide (Boston: South End Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Sheryl Henderson Blunt, “Saving Black Babies,” Christianity Today 47 (February 2003): 22.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Celia R. Daileader, Rhoda E. Johnson, and Amilcar Shabazz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, A. (2007). Gender, Race, and Sexuality in the American Christian Right. In: Daileader, C.R., Johnson, R.E., Shabazz, A. (eds) Women & Others. Signs of Race. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230607323_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics