Abstract
Public benefits programs share common features with other large public bureaucracies that carry out many of the regulatory and distributive functions of modern life. Such organizations must balance a variety of policy purposes and values, both substantive and procedural, in a managerially complex structure. At least in principle, program administration is supposed to strive to be efficient, accurate, timely, consistent, and fair in its decision making, giving equal consideration to each claim, treating individuals in a humane and respectful way, and giving claimants as much information and participatory effect in the process as possible. The inscription of these procedural values presumably provides legitimacy to decision making, a fundamental requirement of “administrative justice” (Mashaw 1983). However, these organizing principles are often competitive in nature, so that trade-offs are inherent in organizing how services are provided and claims are processed.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2007 Christoper J. Jewell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jewell, C.J. (2007). Linking Welfare Caseworker Decision Making to State Institutions. In: Agents of the Welfare State. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230607255_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230607255_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53964-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60725-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)