Abstract
One of the greatest ironies of our intellectual life in the Unites States is that though we are the world’s most religiously diverse nation we are also its most religiously illiterate. Because the two primary sources of information about religion are the media and people’s own faith traditions (or none), relatively few people possess even a basic understanding of the tenets of the world’s religious traditions, let alone an understanding of the complex ways that religion influences and is influenced by social, cultural, and historical forces. Public debates about religion are often painfully misguided and/or superficial because relatively few people possess the knowledge to critically assess sectarian claims or to intelligently challenge those who dismiss religion altogether as the product of blind naiveté or fanaticism. The quotes cited at the beginning of this chapter are typical of students, friends, and professional colleagues (outside of religious studies). Very few (if any) of the authors of these statements would make similarly unqualified pronouncements about any other topic, yet when engaging issues related to religion they speak with unfettered confidence as though their assertions were self-evident.
“Islam promotes violence and discrimination against women.”
“Hinduism is a cult.”
“America is a Christian nation.”
“Homosexuality is a sin.”
“In their heart of hearts, all Muslims are terrorists.”
“Buddhists aren’t violent.”
“Mormons aren’t Christian.”
“Religion and reason are incompatible.”
“Christianity is a peaceful religion.”
“Jews killed Christ.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Marie Wachlin and Byron Johnson, Bible Literacy Report (Fairfax, VA: The Bible Literacy Project, 2005), 10.
See Mark Chancey, Reading, Writing and Religion: Teaching the Bible in Texas Public Schools (Austin: Texas Freedom Network Education Fund, 2006), http://www.tfn.org/religiousfreedom/biblecurriculum/texascourses/. Also, see the discussion regarding the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools later in this same chapter.
See Jean Amery, Suicide: A Discourse on Voluntary Death, trans. John Barlow (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999).
See Viktor Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning (New York: Pocket 1959/1984).
See Robert Gellately, Backing Hitler (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).
Irving Greenberg, “Cloud of Smoke, Pillar of Fire,” in John Roth and Michael Berenbaum, eds., Holocaust: Religious and Philosophical Implications (New York: Paragon, 1989), 318.
U.S. Department of Education, “Guidance on Constitutionally Protected Prayer in Elementary and Secondary Schools,” February 7, 2003, http://ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/religionandschools/prayer_guidance.html accessed March 13, 2003. I am not in full agreement with the interpretations of the First Amendment that the guidelines assume, but I appreciate the attempt to articulate guidance for educators that is specific and clear.
James Davison Hunter characterizes the culture wars as divided into two camps that are both comprised of coalitions. He defines them as “orthodox” and “progressive.” Though I generally agree with the soundness of his categorizations, I think the terms “conservative” and “progressive” are more aptly descriptive for our current context. James Davison Hunter, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America (New York: Basic, 1991). See especially 115, 122, and 124.
See, for example, M. Gabler, Humanism/Moral Relativism in Textbooks (Longview, TX: Educational Research Analysts, 1988);
Stephen Carter, The Culture of Disbelief: How American Law and Politics Trivialize Religious Devotion (New York: Basic Books, 1993).
Alan Sears and Craig Osten, The Homosexual Agenda: The Principal Threat to Religious Freedom (Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2003).
See Edwin Gaustad and Mark Noll, eds., A Documentary History of Religion in America to 1877 (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003), 494–497.
Voddie Baucham, Jr. and Bruce N. Shortt, “Resolution on Homosexuality in the Public Schools,” April 29, 2005, http://www.exodusmandate.org/20050503-resolution/20050503-resolution-homosexuals-in-public-schools.doc accessed August 6, 2005.
Michael J. Perry, Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives (New York: Oxford, 1999).
See Perry, Religion in Politics for an especially persuasive commentary on this insight as it relates specifically to homosexuality, 82–95. For a similar, more general articulation of this perspective see Ron Thiemann’s important text, Religion in Public Life: A Dilemma for Democracy (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1996).
See Rob Reich, Bridging Liberalism and Multiculturalism in American Education (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002).
See, for example, Stephen R. Haynes, Noah’s Curse: The Biblical Justification of American Slavery (New York: Oxford, 2002);
Janet Duitsman Cornelius, When I Can Read My Title Clear: Literacy, Slavery, and Religion in the Antebellum South (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1992);
Lucille Salitan, Elizabeth Buffum Chace, Lydia Buffum Read, Lucy Buffum Lovell, Rebecca Buffum Spring, eds., Virtuous Lives: Four Quaker Sisters Remember Family Life, Abolitionism, and Women’s Suffrage (New York: Continuum, 1994);
Susan Hill Lindley, “You Have Stept Out of Your Place”: A History of Women and Religion in America (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1996).
For suggested primary source material see Horace Bushnell, Women’s Suffrage: Reform Against Nature (New York: Scribner, 1869);
Elizabeth Cady Stanton, The Woman’s Bible (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1999);
Frederick Douglas, Frederick Douglas: Selected Speeches and Writings (Chicago: Lawrence Hill Books, 2000);
Leonard E. Lathrop, A Discourse on the Obligations of a Christian People: In View of the Divine Beneficence, Considered With Reference to the Subject of the Temperance Reform, War, of Capital Punishment, and of Slavery (New York: R.G. and P.S. Wynkoop, Press of J.C. Merrell and Co, 1847);
Charles Manson Taggart, Slavery and the Law in the Light of Christianity: A Discourse Delivered Before the Congregation of Unitarian Christians of Nashville, Tennessee on Sunday Evening, June 22, 1851 (Nashville: J.T.S. Fall, 1851);
Damon Y. Kilgore, The Questions of Today, Caste, Suffrage, Labor, Temperance, Religion: An Oration Delivered Before the Wesleyan Academy Alumni Association at Wilbraham, Mass, June 29, 1870 (New York: Hurd and Houghton, 1870).
American Civil Liberties Union, “Pennsylvania Parents File First-Ever Challenge to ‘Intelligent Design’ Instruction in Public Schools,” news release, December 14, 2004, http://www.aclu.org/ReligiousLiberty/ReligiousLiberty.cfm?ID=17207&c=139 accessed August 5, 2005.
Mark A. Chancey, The Bible and Public Schools: The National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools (Austin: Texas Freedom Network) 2005, 2, http://faculty.smu.edu/mchancey/public_schools.htm accessed November 22, 2006. In another review published in The Journal of Law and Education the author summarizes her findings in the following way: “A widely used Bible course curriculum suffers from a number of constitutional infirmities and is likely to be found unconstitutional if used as written in public schools. The curriculum, which is produced and distributed by the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools (NCBCPS), fails to present the Bible in the objective manner required for public school courses that teach about religion. The curriculum favors Protestantism over Catholicism and a literal interpretation over nonliteralist approaches to the Bible. As written, the curriculum would require teachers and students to make a number of faith statements.” Frances Paterson, “Anatomy of a Bible Course Curriculum,” Journal of Law and Education, January, 2003, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3994/is_200301/ai_n9186918 accessed August 6, 2005.
A good resource to teach about the foundations of issues related to the separation of church and state for secondary students is Edwin S. Gaustad, Church and State in America (New York: Oxford, 1999). This is one of the volumes in the Oxford Religion in American Life series edited by Jon Butler and Harry S. Stout.
Copyright information
© 2007 Diane L. Moore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moore, D.L. (2007). Why Religion Should Be Included in Public School Education. In: Overcoming Religious Illiteracy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230607002_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230607002_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-6349-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60700-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)