Advertisement

Risk Communication, Psychological Management, and Disaster Preparedness

Chapter
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

The DC sniper attacks by John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo terrorized the Baltimore/Washington, D.C., area for three weeks in October 2002. Armed with a Bushmaster XM-15 semiautomatic.223 caliber rifle, the pair claimed ten victims with an additional three injured. Muhammad and Malvo used a specially outfitted Chevrolet Caprice to carry out the attacks and elude the authorities. The car was modified so that a person could shoot from the trunk without the trunk door ever being open. In 2004, a jury handed down a death sentence to Muhammad and multiple life imprisonment sentences without the possibility of parole for Malvo’s role in the shootings. Law enforcement officials have been praised for their identification and arrest of the DC snipers, but investigations have shown numerous areas where better communication practices could have ended the shooting spree sooner.

Keywords

West Nile Virus Risk Communication Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Disaster Preparedness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. 2002. Guide to preparedness: Evaulation using drills and table top exercises. <http://www.naccho.org/toolbox/Guide%20to%20Preparedness-Evaluation%20using%20Drills%20and%20Tabletop%20Exercises.pdf#search=’guide%20to%20preparedness%20evaluation%20using%20drills%20and%20table%20top%20exercises’>
  2. Center for Counterproliferation Research (CCR). 2002. Anthrax in America: A chronology and analysis of the fall 2001 attacks, November.Google Scholar
  3. Choffnes, Eileen. 2002. Bioweapons: New labs, more terror? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 58, (5): 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Comprehensive Risk Analysis and Management Network (CRN). 2000–2004. Risk definitions. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. <http://www.isn.ethz.ch/crn/riskamp;#x2013;issues/risk–definitions.cfm>.
  5. Covello, Vincent T. 2003. Keeping your head in a crisis: Responding to communication challenges posed by bioterrorism and emerging infectious diseases. Association of State and Territorial Health Officers (ASTHO). <http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/riskcomm/documents/77–Questions.pdf5>.
  6. Covello, Vincent T. and Allen, Frederick. 1998. Seven Cardinal Rules of Risk Communication. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. Covello, Vincent T. and Sandman, Peter. 2004. Risk communication: Evolution and revolution. Peter Sandman Website, August. <http://www.petersandman.com>.Google Scholar
  8. Covello, Vincent T., Peters, Richard G., Wojtecki, Joseph G., and Hyde, Richard C. 2001. Risk communication, the West Nile virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: Responding to the communication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 78 (2): 382–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Critical Incident Analysis Group. What is community shielding? University of Virginia. <http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/ciag/communityshieldinghome.cfm.>
  10. Erikson, Kai. 1994. A new species of trouble. W.W. Norton and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Fein, R. A., Vossekuil, B., and Holden, G. 1995. Threat assessment: An approach to prevent targeted violence. National Institute of Justice: Research in Action. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. Fein, Robert A., Vossekuil, Bryan, Pollack, William S., Borum, Randy, Modzeleski, William, and Reddy, Marisa. 2002. Threat assessment in schools: A guide to managing threatening situations and to creating safe school climates. United States Secret Service and United States Department of Education. Washington, D.C., May.Google Scholar
  13. Harvard Center for Risk Analysis. 2005. Harvard School of Public Health. <http://www.hcra.harvard.edu/>.
  14. Howell, W. Nathaniel. 2005. Circling the wagons: Community-based responses to bioterrorism. University of Virginia Health System. <http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/ciag/reports/circlingthewagons>.Google Scholar
  15. Glass, Thomas A. and Schoch-Spana, Monica. 2002. Bioterrorism and the people: How to vaccinate a city against panic. Confronting biological weapons, Clinical Infectuous Diseases: Confronting Biological Weapons 34. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, James H., Jr. 1985. A model of evacuation—Decision making in a Nuclear Reactor Emergency. Geographical Review 75 (4).Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, James H., Jr. and Zeigler, Donald J. 1983. Distinguishing human responses to radiological emergencies. Economic Geography 59 (4).Google Scholar
  18. Lake, Ed. 2005–2006. Analyzing the anthrax attacks. <http://www.anthraxinvestigation.com>.
  19. Lengel, Allan. 2005. Little progress in FBI probe of anthrax attacks. Washington Post, September 16.Google Scholar
  20. Marshall, M. 2002. What to do in a biological weapons attack. University of Virginia Law. <http://www.law.virginia.edu/home2002/html/news/2002_fall/bioterror.htm>.Google Scholar
  21. Montgomery County Police Department. 2002. How to be a good witness. <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpsrv/metro/daily/graphics/sniper/sniper_witness.html>.
  22. National Institute for Chemical Studies. 2001. Sheltering in place as a public protective action. Charleston, West Virginia.Google Scholar
  23. Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools. 2003. Practical information on crisis planning: A guide for schools and communities. United States Department of Education.Google Scholar
  24. Quarantelli E. L. 200 1. The sociology of panic. University of Delaware Disaster Research Center. Regalado, Antonio. 2002. Pentagon plans smallpox shots for up to 500,000. Wall Street Journal, October 14.Google Scholar
  25. Reynolds, Barbara. 2002. Crisis and emergency risk communication: By leaders for leaders. Centers for Disease Control. Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
  26. Shane, Scott. 2005. In 4-year anthrax hunt, F.B.I. finds itself stymied, and sued. New York Times, September 17.Google Scholar
  27. Sorensen, John H. and Vogt, Barbara M. 2001. Will Duct Tape and Plastic Really Work? Issues related to expedient shelter-in-place. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, August.Google Scholar
  28. Shumpert, Barry, Sorensen, John H. and Vogt, Barbara. 2002. Planning protective action decision-making: Evacuate or shelter-in-place? Oak Ridge National Laboratory, June. Slovic, Paul. 2003.Google Scholar
  29. A difficult balance: Risk communication in an age of terrorism. Paper prepared for the Terrorism Task Force of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology.Google Scholar
  30. Wolshon, Brian. 2004. A way out. Transportation Management and Engineering. <http://www.itsworld.com/tme/Index.cfm?powergrid=rfah=|cfap=amp;fuseaction=showArticleamp;articleID=5048>.Google Scholar
  31. Wright, Susan. 2004. Taking biodefense too far. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, November/December.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John B. Noftsinger, Jr., Kenneth F. Newbold, Jr., and Jack K. Wheeler 2007

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations