Advertisement

What Is Homeland Security?

Chapter

Abstract

As a result of some very public embarrassments covered extensively by the 24-hour news media, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has come under increased political pressure. At a recent press conference, the secretary of the DHS warned citizens of emerging threats and suggested that Americans stage mock evacuations of homes, offices, towns, and cities to better prepare themselves in case of a terrorist attack. What resulted in the following days was a sense of panic among the public, chaotic scenes of people fleeing buildings, and massive traffic jams as millions of citizens stage practice evacuations simultaneously. Immediately afterward, reporters, pundits, and comedians hit the television airwaves to critique and satirize these seemingly foolish statements and the concern they caused. To make matters worse, two days later, the General Accounting Office (GAO) released a comprehensive report that revealed various managerial and operational failures that have occurred within the DHS in the past six months. The report cited serious transitional and integration difficulties, highlighted by the absence of information sharing between segments within the organization. In addition, it was revealed that three months earlier, the DHS raised the Threat Level from “Elevated” to “High” based on unsubstantiated intelligence.

Keywords

Terrorist Attack Critical Infrastructure Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency National Guard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abernathy, Ann Marie and Weiner, Leslie. 1995. Evolving federal role for emergency relief. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy 10, no. 1: 45–48.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, Shawn. 2002. A beginner’s guide to learning emergency management. Risk Management 49, no. 5: 24–26.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, Julian E. and Walsh, Kenneth T. 2005. A uniform response? U.S. News and World Report 139, no. 12: 28–29.Google Scholar
  4. Carnevale, Dan. 2005. A degree you hope you never need. The Chronicle of Higher Education February 18: 33.Google Scholar
  5. CNN. 2005. The disaster response: “Magnificent” or “embarassment”? November 14. <http://www.cnn.com/2005/WEATHER/09/02/katrina.response/index.html>s.
  6. Cone, Edward. 2005. Portal power: Dept. of Homeland Security getting it together. CIO Insight January 5: 22.Google Scholar
  7. Haynes, Wendy. 2004. Seeing around corners: Crafting the new Department of Homeland Security. The Review of Policy Research May: 369–372.Google Scholar
  8. Department of the Army. 1999. U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), Supporting Homeland Defense, White Paper. Department of the Army, Norfolk, Virginia U.S., May: 1.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Defense. 2005. Homeland defense: Operation Liberty Shield. <http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/homeland/liberty.html>.
  10. Department of Homeland Security. 2004a. Securing our homeland: U.S. Department of Homeland Security strategic plan. Washington, D.C.: 4–8.Google Scholar
  11. Department of Homeland Security. 2004b. Massive federal response underway for Hurricane Frances. <http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900SID/SODA64L2VL?OpenDocument>.
  12. Department of Homeland Security. 2005a. DHS organization: History: Who became part of the department. <http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/editorial/editorial_0133.xml>.
  13. Department of Homeland Security. 2005b. Department of Homeland Security organization chart. <http://www.dhs.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/DHS_OrgChart.pdf>.
  14. Department of Homeland Security. 2005c. Homeland Security Centers of Excellence: Partnering with the nation’s universities. <http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?theme=43amp;content=4276>.
  15. Department of Homeland Security.Department of Homeland Security. 2005d. DHS budget in brief: Fiscal year 2005. <http://www.dhs.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/FY_2005_BIB_4.pdf>.
  16. Department of Homeland Security2005e. FEMA history. <http://www.fema.gov/about/history.shtm>.
  17. Frum, David. 2003. Beyond duct tape: The best defense is a strong offense. The Wall Street Journal February 22: A. 14.Google Scholar
  18. Gaouette, Nicole, Miller, Alan C., Mazzetti, Mark, McManus, Doyle, Meyer, Josh, Sack, Kevin. 2005. Put to Katrina’s test. The L.A. Times September 11: 1–16.Google Scholar
  19. Garamone, Jim. 2001. A short history of homeland defense. Armed Forces Press Service. <http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Oct2001/n10252001_200110252.html>.
  20. General Accounting Office. 1992. Organizational culture: Techniques companies use to perpetuate or change beliefs and values. GAO, Washington, D.C., February.Google Scholar
  21. General Accounting Office. 2004. Homeland security advisory system: Preliminary observations regarding threat level increases from yellow to orange. Washington, D.C., February 26: 4–6.Google Scholar
  22. General Accounting Office. 2005. Department of Homeland Security:A comprehensive and sustained approach needed to achieve management integration. GAO, Washington, D.C., March: 9.Google Scholar
  23. Gilmore Commission. 2003. Forging America’s new normalcy: Securing our homeland, preserv-ing our liberty. RAND Corporation. Arlington.December 15.Google Scholar
  24. Issues in Science and Technology. 2004. Defense, homeland security dominate Bush’s FY2005 RAK47D budget. Issues in Science and Technology 20, no. 3, Spring: 17.Google Scholar
  25. Kady II, Martin. 2003. Homeland security. The CQ Researcher Online 13, no. 31: 749–772.Google Scholar
  26. Kestin, Sally and O’Matz, Megan. 2004. FEMA gave $21 million in Miami-Dade, Where storms were like “A severe thunderstorm.” The Sun Sentinel October 10: 1.Google Scholar
  27. Knezo, Genevieve J. 2003. Homeland security and counterterrorism research and development: Funding, organization, and oversight. CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service, Washington, D.C., June 20: 6.Google Scholar
  28. Kilian, Michael. 2003. Ridge urges Americans to be ready, not afraid. Chicago Tribune/Knight Ridder Tribune Business News February 20: 1.Google Scholar
  29. Larson, Eric and Peters, John. 2001. Overview of the Posse Comitatus Act. Preparing the U.S. Army for homeland security: Concepts, issues, and options. RAND Corporation: 243–245.Google Scholar
  30. Lathrop, Charles and Eaglen, Mackenzie M. 2001. The Commission on National Security/ 21st Century: A Hart–Rudman Commission primer. The Institute of Land Warfare. April 6: 4.Google Scholar
  31. Lehrer, Eli. 2004. The homeland security bureaucracy. The Public Interest no. 156: 71–85.Google Scholar
  32. Littlejohn, J. Michael. 2004. Doing business with homeland security. ASHRAE Journal 46, no. 12, December: 1.Google Scholar
  33. O’Beirne, Kate. 2002. A bureaucracy with a difference? National Review 54, no. 13, July 15: 20–22.Google Scholar
  34. Office for Domestic Preparedness. 2005. Program highlights. <http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/about/highlights.htm>.
  35. Office of Homeland Security. 2002. National strategy for homeland security. July. <http://www.whitehouse.gov/homeland/book/nat_strat_hls.pdf>.
  36. Office of Press Secretary. 2005. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff announces six point agenda for Department of Homeland Security. The Department of Homeland Security, July 13: 1–3.Google Scholar
  37. Office of State and Local Government Coordination and Preparedness. 2005. SLGCP fact sheet. <http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/docs/slgcpfactsheet.pdf>.
  38. Silliman, Scott. 2006. Using the military during national emergencies. Duke University. May 24. <http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2005/10/sillimanoped_print.htm>.
  39. Sloan, Stephen. 2002. Organizing for national security: The challenge of bureaucratic innovation in the war against terrorism. Public Administration Review 62, Spring: 124–125.Google Scholar
  40. U.S. Congress. 1878. The Posse Comitatus Act. 45th Cong., 3d. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  41. U.S. Congress. House. 2002. The Homeland Security Act. H.R. 5005. 107th Cong., 2d sess. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  42. Walters, Jonathan 2005. Whose guard is it, anyway? Governing 18, no. 12, September: 24.Google Scholar
  43. Waters, Mike. 2005. Federal funding for homeland security. Congressional Budget Office, Economic and Budget Issue Brief. July 20: 1.Google Scholar
  44. The White House. 2001. Executive Order 13228. October 8, 2001. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  45. The White House. 2003. Homeland Security Presidential Directive/Hspd-8. <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/12/20031217–6.html>.
  46. The White House. 2006. President Bush addresses the nation on immigration reform. <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/05/print/20060515–8.html>.
  47. Trebilcock, Craig T. 2000. The myth of Posse Comitatus. Journal of Homeland Security. October.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John B. Noftsinger, Jr., Kenneth F. Newbold, Jr., and Jack K. Wheeler 2007

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations