Abstract
Since the days immediately following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, scholars, journalists, and everyday pundits have frequently invoked the term “modernity” in their speculations about the underlying causes of that day’s violence.1 Regardless of the merits to their arguments, “modernity,” a word that was once restricted to scholarly debate, has now infiltrated mainstream parlance. The growing usage of this word, as in the case of another neologism, “globalization,”2 requires a more nuanced, multilocational, and transtemporal understanding of the term’s meaning. This book provides one piece in the constellation of efforts to understand modernity from different vantage points. Viewing the modern era from the locations of those labeled traditional and primitive reveals that conventional understandings of modernity, whose relational meaning relies on its opposition to the traditional, have been selective and myopic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See, for example, Middle East historian Bernard Lewis’s bestselling What Went Wrong? (2002).
Copyright information
© 2007 Alicia A. Kent
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kent, A.A. (2007). Conclusion. In: African, Native, and Jewish American Literature and the Reshaping of Modernism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230605107_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230605107_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53800-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60510-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)