Abstract
For half a century East Asian regional order has been built around the mutual strategic embrace of America and its Asian partners, most importantly Japan. The region has undergone dramatic transformations over the decades, marked by war, political upheaval, democratization, and economic boom and crisis. Yet the most basic reality of postwar East Asian order has stayed remarkably fixed and enduring—namely, the American-led system of bilateral security ties with Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australian, and countries in Southeast Asia. This “hub-and-spoke” security order today remains the single most important anchor for regional stability. Around it has grown a complex system of political and economic interdependencies. East Asian countries get protection, geopolitical predictability, and access to the American market, and the United States gets frontline strategic partners, geopolitical presence in the region, and (in recent years) capital to finance its deficits. Remarkably, the cold war ended and yet this basic pattern of institutional relations remains intact.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Robert Kagan, “Power and Weakness,” Policy Review, No. 113 (June–July 2002): 3–28.
Aaron Friedberg, “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia,” International Security, Vol. 18, No. 3 (1993): 5–33.
See Geir Lundstadt, Empire by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945–1997 ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 ).
G. John Ikenberry and Charles Kupchan, “Socialization and Hegemony Power,” International Organization, Vol. 44, No. 3 (Summer 1990 ): 283–315.
Robert Gilpin, The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century (Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press, 2000), especially Chapter 2.
Fukui Haroharu, “Tanaka Goes to Peking: A Case Study in Foreign Policymaking,” in T.J. Pempel, ed., Policymaking in Contemporary Japan ( Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977 ), pp. 69–70.
Takashi Inoguchi, “Four Japanese Scenarios for the Future,” International Affairs, Vol. 65, No. 1 (Winter 1988–1989): 15–28.
See Kent E. Calder, “Japanese Foreign Economic Policy Formation: Explaining the Reactive State,” World Politics, Vol. 40, No. 4 (July 1988): 517–541.
Copyright information
© 2007 G. John Ikenberry and Takashi Inoguchi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ikenberry, G.J., Inoguchi, T. (2007). Introduction. In: The Uses of Institutions: The U.S., Japan, and Governance in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603547_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603547_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53662-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60354-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)