Skip to main content

Abstract

For half a century East Asian regional order has been built around the mutual strategic embrace of America and its Asian partners, most importantly Japan. The region has undergone dramatic transformations over the decades, marked by war, political upheaval, democratization, and economic boom and crisis. Yet the most basic reality of postwar East Asian order has stayed remarkably fixed and enduring—namely, the American-led system of bilateral security ties with Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australian, and countries in Southeast Asia. This “hub-and-spoke” security order today remains the single most important anchor for regional stability. Around it has grown a complex system of political and economic interdependencies. East Asian countries get protection, geopolitical predictability, and access to the American market, and the United States gets frontline strategic partners, geopolitical presence in the region, and (in recent years) capital to finance its deficits. Remarkably, the cold war ended and yet this basic pattern of institutional relations remains intact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Robert Kagan, “Power and Weakness,” Policy Review, No. 113 (June–July 2002): 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aaron Friedberg, “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia,” International Security, Vol. 18, No. 3 (1993): 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See Geir Lundstadt, Empire by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945–1997 ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. John Ikenberry and Charles Kupchan, “Socialization and Hegemony Power,” International Organization, Vol. 44, No. 3 (Summer 1990 ): 283–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robert Gilpin, The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century (Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press, 2000), especially Chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fukui Haroharu, “Tanaka Goes to Peking: A Case Study in Foreign Policymaking,” in T.J. Pempel, ed., Policymaking in Contemporary Japan ( Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977 ), pp. 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Takashi Inoguchi, “Four Japanese Scenarios for the Future,” International Affairs, Vol. 65, No. 1 (Winter 1988–1989): 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. See Kent E. Calder, “Japanese Foreign Economic Policy Formation: Explaining the Reactive State,” World Politics, Vol. 40, No. 4 (July 1988): 517–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 G. John Ikenberry and Takashi Inoguchi

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ikenberry, G.J., Inoguchi, T. (2007). Introduction. In: The Uses of Institutions: The U.S., Japan, and Governance in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603547_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics