Abstract
Smart Oxford philosophy professors, seeking to find out which of their smart students were smartest, and perhaps worthy of becoming the next generation of smart philosophy professors, used to set examination questions along the lines of: “Is this the right question?”1 The answers were hardly useful; they were never—to my knowledge—expanded into enlightening books entitled Is This The Right Book?; but they did serve an immediate purpose—sorting philosophical sheep from nonphilosophical goats. The question we are considering has something of the same instrumental quality: it has served to provoke some lively discussions and (unlike the previous example) it has been developed into a diverse and interesting book.2 Pragmatically, therefore, the question works; but as a “heuristic device” for understanding Latin America, it is not much help. Like “Is this the right question?” it is laden with conceptual difficulties and, if we seek to go beyond such difficulties and “operationalize” the question in specific empirical contexts, it is difficult to make progress. In this, it resembles many other notional questions we might concoct: When was Latin America happy? When was Latin America good? And, the most obvious cognate question: When was Latin America traditional? On the other hand, it differs from other questions which, though they sound similar, are substantially different, since they are conceptually clearer and, to some degree, empirically operationizable, for example: When was Latin America literate? When was Latin America urban? When was Latin America industrial?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Annino, Antonio (1995). Historia de las elecciones en lberoamérica, siglo XIX. Buenos Aires, FCE.
Bernard, Jean-Pierre et al. (1973). Guide to the Political Parties of South America. Harmondsworth: Pengu in Books.
Clews Parsons, Elsie (1936). Mitla. Town of the Souls. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Collier, D. and Mahon, J. E. (1993). “Conceptual `Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 87: 845–55.
Costo Villegas, Daniel (1955–65) coord. La historia moderna de México 9 vols. Mexico: Hermes.
Coutinho, Marilia (2003). “Tropical Medicine in Brazil: The Case of Chagas’ Disease,” in Diego Armus (ed.), Disease in the History of Modern Latin America. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 76–100.
Escalante Gonzalbo, Fernando (1992). Ciudadanos imaginarios. Mexico: El Colegio de México.
Fascina, Francis and Charles Harrison (eds.) (1982). Modern Art and Modernism: A Critical Anthology. London: Harper & Row.
Forment, Carlos (2003). Democracy in Latin America, 1760–1900, vol. 1. Civic Selfhood and Public Life in Mexico and Peru. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Freund, Julien (1968). The Sociology of Max Weber. Harmondsworth: Pengu in Books.
Geertz, Clifford (1993). The Interpretation of Cultures. London: Fontana.
Giddens, Anthony (1987). The Nation-State and Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gran, Peter (1996). Beyond Eurocentrism. A New View of Modern World History. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
Greene, Alison (2001). “Cablevision(nation) in Rural Yucatan: Performing Modernity and Mexicanidad in the Early 1990s,” in Gilbert M. Joseph, Anne Rubinstein, and Eric Zolov (eds.), Fragments of a Golden Age. The Politics of Culture in Mexico Since 1940. Durham: Duke University Press.
Guardino, Peter (1996). Peasants, Politics and the Formation of Mexico’s National State: Guerrero 1800–57. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Guardino, Peter (2005). Popular Political Culture in Oaxaca 1750–1850. Durham: Duke University Press.
Guerra, François-Xavier, Annick Lempérière, et al. (1998). Los espacios politicos en Iberoamérica. Mexico: FCE.
Harris, Marvin (1976). “The History and Significance of the Emic/Eric Distinction.” Annual Review of Anthropology 5: 329–50.
Harrison, Laurence E. and Huntington, Samuel P. (eds.) (2000). Culture Matters. How Values Shape Human Progress. New York: Basic Books.
Hollinger, David A. (2001). “Enlightenment and the Genealogy of Cultural Conflict in the United States,” in Keith Michael Baker and Peter Hanns Reill (eds.), What’s Left of Enlightenment? Stanford: Stanford University Press, p. 18.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Inglehart, Ronald (1988). “The Renaissance of Political Culture.” American Political Science Review 82: 1203–30.
Inkeles, Alex and David H. Smith (1974). Becoming Modern. Individual Change in Six Developing Countries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Israel, Jonathan I. (2001). Radical Enlightenment. Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, Colin (2002). The Great Nation. France from Louis XV to Napoleon. London: Penguin.
Kahl, Joseph A. (1974). The Measurement of Modernism. A Study of Values in Brazil and Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Knight, Alan (1990). “Race, Racism and Indigenismo: Mexico 1910–14,” in Richard Graham (ed.), The Idea of Race in Latin America 1870–1940. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Knight, Alan (1994). “Popular Culture and the Revolutionary State in Mexico, 1910–40.” Hispanic American Historical Review 73: 393–444.
Knight, Alan (1998). “Populism and Neo-Populism in Latin America, Especially Mexico.” Journal of Latin American Studies 30(2): 223–48.
Knight, Alan (2002). Mexico: From the Beginning to the Spanish Conquest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Larrafn, Jorge (2000). Identity and Modernity in Latin America. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Levine, David (2001). At the Dawn of Modernity. Biology, Culture and Material Life in Europe after the Year 1000. Berkeley: University of California Press.
McIntyre, Alasdair (1985). After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd edn. London: Duckworth.
MacLachlan, Colin M. and Jaime E. Rodriguez O. (1980). The Forging of the Cosmic Race, A Reinterpretation of Colonial Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Melville, Eleanor G. K. (1994). A Plague of Sheep: Environmental Consequences of the Conquest of Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nicholls, Peter (1995). Modernisms: A Literary Guide. London: Macmillan.
Redfield, Robert (1930). Teportic n, a Mexican Village. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Renegger, N. J. (1995). Political Theory, Modernity and Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sarmiento, Domingo F. (1961). Facundo. Civilizaciôn y barbarie. New York: Doubleday.
Scott, James C. (1998). Seeing Like a State. How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shermer, Michael (1997). Why People Believe Weird Things. New York: Henry Holt.
Talmon, J. L. (1985). The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy. Boulder: Westview Press, first pubd. 1952.
Tipps, Dean C. (1973). “Modernization Theory and the Study of National Societies: A Critical Perspective.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 15(2): 199–226.
Van Young, Eric (2001). The Other Rebellion: Popular Violence, Ideology and the Mexican Struggle for Independence 1820–21. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Vinas, David (1994). “Sarmiento: Madness or Accumulation,” in Tulio Halperin Donghi, Ivan Jaksic, Gwen Kirkpatrick, and Francine Masiello (eds.), Sarmiento. Author of a Nation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Vyse, Stuart A. (1997). Believing in Magic. The Psychology of Superstition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitaker, Arthur (1961). Latin America and the Enlightenment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Wiarda, Howard J. (2001). The Soul of Latin America. The Cultural and Political Tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wilkie, James W. (1970). The Mexican Revolution: Federal Expenditure and Social Change since 1910, 2nd edn. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wolf, Eric R. (1982). Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2007 Nicola Miller and Stephen Hart
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knight, A. (2007). When Was Latin America Modern? A Historian’s Response. In: Miller, N., Hart, S. (eds) When Was Latin America Modern?. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603042_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603042_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53864-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60304-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)