Abstract
An integrative review of the concept of Third Cinema provides useful heuristic touchstones for this chapter. Third Cinema theory in its present form is not so much a demolition order against the input of the American and European film industries as it is a theoretical framework that seeks to give voice and visibility to socially resonant films that foreground the Third World experience. The sheer explicitness of a film’s depiction of Third World misery cannot be confounded with sociopolitical analysis, that is, a causal examination of the oppressive structures at work in the Third World situation. Essentially, this is the linchpin that distinguishes Third Cinema from other political films. The Iranian film Kandahar (Mohsen Makhmalbaf, 2001), for instance, essays the grim scenario of mine-infested, Taliban-controlled Afghanistan in riveting documentary realism but the film’s sociopolitical commentary is confined to the symptomatic. The more causal, historical issues such as the damaging impact of Cold War geopolitics on the region are left unexplored. The film then, though strongly political and decidedly Third Worldist, does not quite reflect the Third Cinema project.1 This is not meant to devalue the importance of Kandahar or any other Third World film; Third Cinema is a targeted, incisive, and importantly analytical portrayal of the Third World situation but it is by no means the only valid measure of Third World cinematic representation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For a recent survey of the Third Cinema debate, refer to the introductory chapter in Anthony R. Guneratne and Wimal Dissanayake, eds., Rethinking Third Cinema (New York: Routledge, 2003), 1–28
Mike Wayne, Political Film: The Dialectics of Third Cinema (London: Pluto Press, 2001), 6
Teshome Gabriel, Third Cinema in the Third World: The Aesthetics of Liberation (Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 1979), 82
Laura U. Marks, The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses (London: Duke University Press, 2000), 6–7
Ella Shohat and Robert Stam, Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media (London: Routledge, 1996), 28
Mbye B. Cham and Claire Andrade-Watkins, Blackframes: Critical Perspectives on Black Independent Cinema (Cambridge,MA: The MIT Press, 1988), 62–79
Naim Stifan Ateek, Justice and Only Justice: A Palestinian Theology of Liberation (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1990), 74–75
See Anne Thomson, “The Struggle of Memory Against Forgetting,” in Terry George, ed., Hotel Rwanda: Bringing the Story of an African Hero to Film (New York: Newmarket Press, 2005), 52
Tom Moylan, Demand the Impossible: Science Fiction and the Utopian Imagination (New York: Methuen, 1986), 213
Copyright information
© 2006 Antonio D. Sison
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sison, A.D. (2006). Films from a Virtual Geography of Third Cinema. In: Screening Schillebeeckx. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230602106_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230602106_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53576-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60210-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)