Abstract
Most of the characters in Rohinton Mistry’s Family Matters (2002) are members of the Parsi community in Bombay. The main story line covers roughly six months, from August 1995 to early 1996. There is a forty-page epilogue at the end, situated five years later, in 2000. The novel focuses on a spectacular reversal—one of the adult characters, forty-three-year-old Yezad Chenoy, veers, in the space of a few months, from a modern, “enlightened,” indifferent skepticism toward traditional Parsi beliefs and rituals to an intransigent, fanatical endorsing of the most orthodox tendencies of the Parsi religion. My aim is to analyze the subtle way in which the narrative voice chronicles this reversion and its causes: if Mistry’s own distaste for fundamentalist attitudes does transpire, it is in a discreet, oblique way, through the use of contrasting structural devices and multiple focalization. Thus, the narrative conveys a certain sense of pessimism and fatalism in the face of the reversibility of beliefs: bigotry can be an acquired and cultivated taste rather than the result of indoctrination at an early age, and “reform” is an unstable, reversible process. The narrative gives a great deal of importance to rabble-rousing forms of Hindu nationalism and sectarianism, which serve as a background and a foil to the description of orthodox Parsi attitudes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For a developed reflection on the definition of the word “fundamentalism,” see Terry Eagleton’s grimly humorous article, “Pedants and Partisans,” The Guardian, February 22, 2003.
On December 6, 1992, in the wake of a nationwide campaign to “arouse the pride” of Hindus, mobs of Hindu nationalists demolished this old mosque, said to have been built on the site of a Hindu temple devoted to the cult of Ram, and announced their intention of replacing it with a huge Hindu temple (Ram Mandir).
Rohinton Mistry, Family Matters (London: Faber and Faber, 2003), 144. Subsequently cited parenthetically in the text.
Arundhati Roy, “Democracy: Who Is She When She Is at Home?” War Talk (Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 2003), 21. Subsequently cited parenthetically in the text.
Quoted by Anthony Spaeth in “Rushdie Offends Again,” Time, September 11, 1995, 53. In Family Matters, Yezad is accused by his son Murad of having the same notions of “purity” as Hitler (482).
Salman Rushdie, The Moor’s Last Sigh (London: Jonathan Cape, 1995), 338. Subsequently cited parenthetically in the text.
Bharatiya Janata Party (the Indian People’s Party), Janata Dal, Vishwa Hindu Parishad (Universal Hindu Association), and Bahujan Samaj Party.
Janata Party and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (literally, the National Self-Help Group, a right-wing Hindu cultural guild, the ideological support of the BJP).
Cf. John F. Burns, “Another Rushdie Novel, Another Bitter Epilogue,” The New York Times, December 2, 1995.
Muslims were to be viciously targeted again ten years later, with the mass rapes and killings orchestrated in the state of Gujarat in March 2002, under the impetus of Gujarat’s chief minister, Narendra Modi, who was triumphantly elected in the regional elections of Gujarat in December 2002 (but fell in the elections of May 2004).
Bharatya Janata Party, the nationalist Hindu party that stayed in power in India, with a coalition of regional parties from 1998 to May 2004.
T. B. Hansen, The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), 174.
Stuart Corbridge and John Harriss, Reinventing India: Liberalization, Hindu Nationalism and Popular Democracy (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2000), 133.
Fifty-eight Hindu passengers were burned alive on the Sabarmati Express in Godhra in March 2002, allegedly by Muslims, but in the absence of any concrete evidence different theories prevail, which blame an angry Muslim mob, a plot by the Pakistani Intelligence Services, a plot by Hindu extremists to set off the Hindu backlash that followed, and so on (cf. Roy, “Democracy,” 120).
Salman Rushdie, Imaginary Homelands (London: Granta, 1991), 394–95.
Interestingly, as Tariq Ali quips in The Clash of Fundamentalisms (London: Verso, 2002), 37n, the “ethnic cleansing” carried out by Catholic Spain against Jews and Muslims after the Reconquista caused a breakdown in personal hygiene, because baths, being associated with Islam and sensuality, were destroyed, and the spies of the Inquisition kept a look out for people who appeared too keen on personal ablutions, a sure sign in their eyes that the latter were imperfect converts who had remained secretly loyal to their old faith.
Hari Kunzru, The Impressionist (London: Penguin Books, 2003), 31. Subsequently cited parenthetically in the text.
Emulating his creator, who was born in Bombay and emigrated to Canada, where he has lived since 1975.
Yezad despises the word “Zoroaster,” which for him is a “Greek perversion” of Zarathustra (463).
Thus Yezad is again set in parallel with Coomy, who is portrayed as a mock avatar of Lady Macbeth (109).
Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar, The Madwoman in the Attic (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984), 4. Their quotation is taken from Edward W. Said, Beginnings: Intention and Method (New York: Basic Books, 1975), 83.
Twenty Indian writers were invited to France in November 2002 to give conferences and take part in debates. The event was organized by “Les Belles Etrangères,” an organism sponsored by the French Ministry of Culture to promote foreign literature translated into French.
In The Ground Beneath Her Feet, Rushdie portrayed a Parsi in this vein: the westernized, anglophile, classicist scholar Sir Darius Xerxes Cama.
Monica Ali, Brick Lane (London: Doubleday, 2003), 219. Subsequently cited parenthetically in the text.
See Chahdortt Djavann, Bas les voiles! (Paris: Gallimard, 2003), 22.
Jehangir used to love his father’s “invincible” whistle, “like a cheerful umbrella” under which “the world was safe and wonderful” (288).
One of Mistry’s discreet and humorous allusions to Rushdie and his “Booker of Bookers,” Midnight’s Children.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2007 Catherine Pesso-Miquel and Klaus Stierstorfer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pesso-Miquel, C. (2007). From Enlightenment To The Prison Of Light: Reverting To Parsi Fundamentalism In Rohinton Mistry’s Family Matters. In: Pesso-Miquel, C., Stierstorfer, K. (eds) Fundamentalism and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601864_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601864_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53561-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60186-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)