Abstract
The writings of Samuel Pepys seem an unlikely source for satire of English colonial pretensions in the Restoration period. Little of the English colonial world is given any attention in Pepys’s famous Diary, and, judging from its nine mundane references to Virginia and New England, the American colonies were simply not an important part of Pepys’s mental geography. The only major overseas establishment that consistently held Pepys’s attention was the outpost in Tangier (1661–84), which, in most accounts of English colonial history, is considered to be peripheral if it is mentioned at all. In one respect, the focus of seventeenth-century scholars on English overseas activity in the Caribbean, North America, and the East Indies is understandable, given the centrality of those areas to the later British Empire. In contrast, Tangier produced no line of colonial succession, and it was not the staging ground of a later British empire in North Africa, making it easier to underestimate the importance of Tangier to the government of Charles II. It is hard to build a narrative of the “rise of the British empire” on the ruins of English Tangier.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Edwin Chappell, introduction to The Tangier Papers of Samuel Pepys, ed. Edwin Chappell (London: Navy Records Society, 1935), p. xx. All subsequent citations will be found in the text.
Linda Colley is quoted in Armitage, The Ideological Origins of the British Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 16. Colley’s full argument is found in “The Imperial Embrace,” Yale Review 81:4 (1993): 92–8, an insightful review of Edward Said’s Culture and Imperialism.
For more on the general indifference to the English colonies, see Koebner, Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961), pp. 93–6.
J. Martin Evans, Milton’s Imperial Epic: Paradise Lost and the Discourse of Colonization (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996), p. 14.
Peter Linebaugh and Marcus Rediker, The Many-Headed Hydra: Sailors, Slaves, Commoners, and the Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic (Boston: Beacon Press, 2000).
Stuart Sherman, Telling Time: Clocks, Diaries, and English Diurnal Form, 1660–1785 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), p. 30.
See The Diary of Samuel Pepys, 11 vols., ed. Robert Latham and William Matthews (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971–1983), 1.20.67; 8.21 and 7.15.66; 7.207, for an example of Pepys’s pleasure in the “Advice to a Painter” satires and for his thoughts about writing a lampoon on the Stuart conduct of the war. All subsequent citations will be found in the text in the above format, which indicates the date of the passage first, followed by volume number and page number.
E.M.G. Routh, Tangier: England’s Lost Atlantic Outpost, 1661–1684 (London: John Murray, 1912), p. 66. All subsequent citations will appear in the text.
See John Childs, The Army of Charles II (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976), pp. 121–4, for the high mortality rates in the garrison and for Tangier’s terrible reputation among English soldiers and officers.
David Quint, Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), p. 9.
Michael Seidel, Satiric Inheritance: Rabelais to Sterne (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), p. 21. All subsequent citations will appear in the text.
George Etherege, The Man of Mode, or, Sir Fopling Flutter in The Dramatic Works of Sir George Etherege, ed. H.F.B. Brett-Smith (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1927), 2; I.i.271–2.
James Grantham Turner, “Pepys and the Private Parts of Monarchy,” in Culture and Society in the Stuart Restoration, ed. Gerald MacLean (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 105. All subsequent citations will appear in the text.
Stephen Saunders Webb, Lord Churchill’s Coup: The Anglo-American Empire and the Glorious Revolution Reconsidered (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1998), pp. 21–2. All subsequent citations will appear in the text.
Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, rev. ed. (London: Verso, 1991), p. 150.
Srinivas Aravamudan, Tropicopolitans: Colonialism and Agency, 1688–1804 (Durham: Duke University Press, 1999), pp. 14–15.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Goran V. Stanivukovic
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beach, A.R. (2007). Satirizing English Tangier in Samuel Pepys’s Diary and Tangier Papers . In: Stanivukovic, G.V. (eds) Remapping the Mediterranean World in Early Modern English Writings. Early Modern Cultural Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601840_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601840_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53625-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60184-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)