Abstract
This chapter begins with a narrower version of the question posed throughout this bookâdoes the public presidency pose a threat to constitutional democracy in America? While the framers may have been somewhat ambivalent about how strong the president should be, with James Madison arguing for a government that limited itself through checks and balances to diffuse power in Federalist 51 while Alexander Hamilton argued for a powerful and energetic executive in Federalist 70, the public arena has certainly provided some presidents with broader powers than perhaps intended. As with other powers of the office, the public aspects of the presidency have had important historical developments, particularly during the twentieth century. The proliferation of daily newspapers at the turn of the twentieth century, followed by the advent of radio, then television, and then the expansion of newer technologies like the Internet and satellite transmissions, have created myriad opportunities for presidents to communicate. Along with the opportunities came the expectation that the president would be an effective communicator, using the bully pulpit to rally for public policies and to share his vision for America with his fellow citizens.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Peter G. Northouse, Leadership: Theory and Practice, 3rd ed. (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2004). Northouse outlines a variety of leadership theories that are applicable to understanding presidential leadership, including approaches that focus on traits, skills, styles, situations, and personality.
James MacGregor Burns, Transforming Leadership (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2003), 29.
Bruce Miroff, Icons of Democracy: American Leaders as Heroes, Aristocrats, Dissenters, & Democrats (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2000).
David Gergen, Eyewitness to Power: The Essence of Leadership (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000), 345â9.
David Zarefsky, âPresidential Rhetoric and the Power of Definition,â Presidential Studies Quarterly 34, no. 3 (September 2004): 607â19.
Jeffrey K. Tulis, The Rhetorical Presidency (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987), 28.
Roderick P. Hart, The Sound of Leadership: Presidential Communication in the Modern Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), 212.
Karlyn Kohrs Campbell and Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Deeds Done in Words: Presidential Rhetoric and the Genres of Governance (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), 1, 213â9.
Lori Cox Han, Governing From Center Stage: White House Communication Strategies during the Television Age of Politics (Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2001), 2.
Mary E. Stuckey, The President as Interpreter-in-Chief (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1991), 1â3.
Steven E. Schier, âA Unique Presidency,â in The Postmodern Presidency: Bill Clintonâs Legacy in U.S. Politics, ed., Steven E. Schier (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000).
E.J. Dionne, âThe Clinton Enigma: Seeking Consensus, Breeding Discord,â in The Election of 2000, ed., Gerald Pomper (New York: Chatham House Publishers, 2001), 1â11.
William C. Berman, From the Center to the Edge: The Politics and Policies of the Clinton Presidency (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001), 123.
Colin Campbell and Bert A. Rockman, âIntroductionâ to The Clinton Legacy (New York: Chatham House Publishers, 2001), ix.
George C. Edwards III, âCampaigning Is Not Governing: Bill Clintonâs Rhetorical Presidency,â in The Clinton Legacy, Colin Campbell and Bert A. Rockman, eds. (New York: Chatham House, 2000), 34â5.
Gary L. Gregg II, âDignified Authenticity: George W. Bush and the Symbolic Presidency,â in Considering the Bush Presidency, Gary L. Gregg II and Mark J. Rozell, eds. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 88.
See David A. Crockett, âGeorge W. Bush and the Unrhetorical Rhetorical Presidency,â Rhetoric & Public Affairs 6, no. 3 (2003): 465â86.
Bert A. Rockman, âPresidential Leadership in an Era of Party Polarizationâ The George W. Bush Presidency,â in The George W. Bush Presidency: Appraisals and Prospects, Colin Campbell and Bert A. Rockman, eds. (Washington: CQ Press, 2004), 351.
Fred I. Greenstein, âThe Leadership Style of George W. Bush,â in The George W. Bush Presidency: An Early Assessment, ed., Fred I. Greenstein (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003), 7.
While Bush received some initial negative coverage from the press and battled with former president Bill Clinton for headlines in his first several weeks in office, the continuing coverage of Clintonâs problems (controversial pardons, missing items from the White House, etc.) provided a positive contrast for Bush in highlighting the differences in their leadership styles and personalities. See Lori Cox Han and Matthew J. Krov, âLife after the White House: The Public Post-Presidency and the Development of Presidential Legacies,â in In the Public Domain: Presidents and the Challenge of Public Leadership, Lori Cox Han and Diane J. Heith, eds. (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2005).
George C. Edwards III, On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003), ix.
See Jill Lawrence and Judy Keen, âElection Is Turning into a Duel of the Manly Men,â USA Today, September 23, 2004, 1A; and âLexington: Itâs a Manâs World,â The Economist, August 7, 2004, 28.
David Gergen, âQuestions without Answers,â U.S. News and World Report, October 4, 2004, 64.
John J. Dilulio, Jr., âA View from Within,â in The George W. Bush Presidency: An Early Assessment, ed., Fred I. Greenstein (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003), 257.
Jeffrey K. Tulis, âRevising the Rhetorical Presidency,â in Beyond the Rhetorical Presidency, ed., Martin J. Medhurst (College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, 1996), 3, 10â14.
Thomas E. Patterson, âBad News, Bad Governance,â Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546 (July 1996): 97â108.
Samuel Kernell, Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership, 3rd ed. (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1997), ix.
See both Kernell and Richard Rose, The Postmodern President (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, 1991), 132.
Frank Rich, âDecision 2004: Fear Fatigue v. Sheer Fatigue,â New York Times, October 31, 2004, Sec. 2, 1.
Rockman, âPresidential Leadership in an Era of Party Polarization,â 353.
Fred I. Greenstein, The Presidential Difference: Leadership Style from FDR to George W. Bush, 2nd ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), 207.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
Âİ 2006 Michael A. Genovese and Lori Cox Han
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Han, L.C. (2006). The President Over the Public: The Plebiscitary Presidency at Center Stage. In: Genovese, M.A., Han, L.C. (eds) The Presidency and the Challenge of Democracy. The Evolving American Presidency Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230600744_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230600744_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-7423-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60074-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)