Abstract
Since all systems are fallible, the existence of mechanisms to review and rectify errors made is of central importance. Within the criminal justice process errors of the trial court may result in either a wrongful conviction or sentence. Access to an effective appeal process is required both to remedy errors and injustices and (it is hoped) to deter practices which lead to them. Beyond the injustice which may be suffered by individuals, wider damage to the integrity of the system may result from wrongful convictions; therefore, miscarriages must be rooted out and put right as quickly as possible. As Zander noted in his Dissent to the RCCJ report: ‘Where the integrity of the process is fatally flawed, the conviction should be quashed as an expression of the system’s repugnance at the methods used by those acting for the prosecution’ (RCCJ, 1993: 234).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
For 1988, see ibid.; and for 1989–97, see LCD (1997) Judicial Statistics: p. 12.
Thornton (1993: 927–8) and Sir John May, Second Report of the Maguire Case, 1992–93, HC 296.
McGrory (1998) The Times September 5: 19.
Legal Aid Board, Guidance: Exercise of Devolved Powers (January 1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 Frank Belloni and Jacqueline Hodgson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Belloni, F., Hodgson, J. (2000). The Appellate System and Miscarriages of Justice. In: Criminal Injustice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599765_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599765_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-77883-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59976-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)