Abstract
However much Defoe disapproved of improvident spending on luxuries and any premature pretence to gentility on the part of tradesmen, he did not wish to deny the historical reality of social mobility. Families and nations might be swept to greatness by the tides of commerce but they might also be waylaid in its concomitant pools and eddies of luxury. When decline was apparent, he sought to understand its causes and correct them. If emulative consumption could ruin a young tradesman, self-justifying extravagance might sink an ancient family into debt and obscurity. When, however, pre-eminence or advance were deserved, he celebrated them. Defoe’s highly successful, three-volume Tour Thro’ the Whole Island of Great Britain reveals the delight he took in surveying the economic and social success achieved by early-modern captains of finance and industry — the handsome villas they built along the Thames, the estates they rescued from decay, the social, political, and marital alliances they made with the gentry and nobility. Social mobility, however, did not mean social revolution. Although Defoe believed that merit should be recognized and even rewarded, he was not trying to eliminate the gradation of rank.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
[Defoe], A Tour Thro’ the Whole Island of Great Britain (1724–6), ed. G. D. H. Cole (1968). There are many examples of this; the best, perhaps, is his praise of Wilton and the Earl of Pembroke, pp. 193–6. Of course Defoe would have approved of Pembroke, ex President of the Royal Society and Commissioner of the Treaty of Union, 1707.
[Defoe], A Plan of the English Commerce (2nd edn, 1730); Facsimile Text Edition, Reprints of Economic Classics (New York, 1967), p. 48.
[Defoe], Tour, p. 3; see also Ilse Vickers, chapter 8: ‘Defoe’s Tour: a Natural history of Man and his Activities’, in Defoe and the New Sciences (Cambridge, 1996), pp. 151–76.
Jeremy Black, BritishForeign Policy in theAge ofWalpole (Edinburgh, 1985), especially pp. 93–117.
Charles G. Salas has argued that Raleigh used his pro-Carthaginian account of the Punic wars to criticize James I, his political enemies Charles and Thomas Howard, and England’s policies toward Spain and later France. See his ‘Ralegh and the Punic Wars’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 57 (1996): 195–215.
For earlier references see, for example, the Review (24 January 1706 and 26 February 1709); later analyses appear in A Brief Deduction of the Original, Progress, and Irnrnense Greatness of the British Woollen Manufacture (1727) and his unfinished manuscript, Of Royall Education.
Karl D. Bulbring (ed.), Of Royall Educacion: a Fragmentary Treatise by Daniel Defoe (London, 1895), p. 15. This unfinished work was probably composed after June 1727 and left in manuscript at Defoe’s death in 1731.
[Defoe], A General History of Discoveries and Improvenrents, p. 211. As discussed in Chapter 5, in A General History of Trade (1713), Defoe had credited Edward III for being the first king to prohibit the export of raw wool.
Keith Wrightson, Earthly Necessities: Economic Lives in Early-Modern Britain (Yale, 2000), pp. 5–6.
Karl D. Bulbring (ed.), The Compleat English Gentleman by Daniel Defoe (1890), pp. 257, 262.
Copyright information
© 2007 Katherine Clark
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clark, K. (2007). Defoe’s Historical Vision: Commerce and Gentility in the 1720s. In: Daniel Defoe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599529_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599529_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42954-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59952-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)