Gender in and beyond the Canon, or how to make Women (In)visible in History

  • Geertje Mak

Abstract

When the Dutch columnist and right-wing populist politician Pim Fortuyn, who was assassinated in 2002, published his diatribe Against the Islamisation of our Culture (1997) he used a historical narrative to illustrate what was most essential to ‘our’ culture.’ This is not so remarkable, in that since the nineteenth century one of history’s most important — and most contested — uses has been the justification, characterization and marking off of national identities. What was remarkable, however, was what he considered the most important historical change in the Netherlands since the emergence of the welfare state. After a brief overview of the history of the emancipation of women and the liberation of homosexuals in the final decades of the twentieth century, he concluded: ‘It is my moral judgement that this is humankind’s greatest mental and cultural achievement in the modern world since the creation of the welfare state. At any rate, I do not know of a greater accomplishment and effort of civilisation with more far-reaching results.’2 As Islam did not acknowledge equal rights for women and did not tolerate homosexuality at all, his argument went, Islam was a threat to a tolerant Dutch society at large.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    On Fortuyn, see I. Buruma, Murder in Amsterdam (New York, 2006).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Fortuyn, De islamisering van onze cultuur. Nederlandse identiteit als fundament (Uithoorn and Rotterdam, 2001), p. 70.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    It is found in eighteenth-century authors such as Buffon, Montesquieu, Condorcet; also in the Scottish Enlightenment. See S. Knott and B. Taylor (eds), Women, Gender and Enlightenment (Basingstoke and New York, 2005).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    See B. Prins, The Standpoint in Question: Situated Knowledges and the Dutch Minority Discourse (Utrecht, 1997).Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    M. Yerkes, Women’s Preferences or Delineated Policies? The Development of Part-Time Work in the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom (Amsterdam, 2005);Google Scholar
  6. A. Janssens, The Rise and Decline of the Male Breadwinner Family? (Cambridge, 1997).Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    J.W. Scott, Gender and the Politics of History (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    I. Blom, ‘Gender and Nation in International Comparison’, in I. Blom, K. Hagemann and C. Hall (eds), Gendered Nations. Nationalisms and Gender Order in the Long Nineteenth Century (Oxford and New York, 2000), pp. 3–26, p. 3.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Blom, ‘Gender and Nation’, p. 17. See for the relation between nation, the definition of civil rights and the unequal position of men and women within marriage also N. Cott, Public Vows: a History of Marriage and the Nation (Cambridge, 2000).Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    S. Stuurman, ‘Beyond “Modern Equality”. Can We Write a World History of Transcultural Equality?’, Intellectual News: Review of the International Society for Intellectual History (July 2007) forthcoming.Google Scholar
  11. See on these two discourses also C. Hall, Civilising Subjects. Metropole and Colony in the English Imagination (Cambridge, 2002), p. 17.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    See for the discourse on women, for instance, S. Stuurman, François Poulain de la Barre and the Invention of Modern Equality (Cambridge MA, 2004);Google Scholar
  13. J. Israel, Enlightenment Contested, Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man (Oxford, 2006), pp. 572–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 15.
    Knott and Taylor, Women, Gender and Enlightenment; B. Caine and G. Sluga, Gendering European History (Londen and New York, 2000), pp. 7–31.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    T. Laqueur, Making Sex. Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (Cambridge MA, 1990);Google Scholar
  16. C. Honegger, Die Ordnung der Geschlechter. Die Wissenschaften vom Menschen und das Weib (Frankfurt and New York, 1991);Google Scholar
  17. L. Schiebinger, The Mind has no Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science (Cambridge MA, 1989).Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    M. Foucault, ‘Two Lectures’, in C. Gordon (ed.), Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (New York, 1980), pp. 78–108, esp. pp. 92–108.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    R.M. Young and E. Belaban, ‘The Female Brain by Louann Brizendine (Morgan Road 2006)’, Nature, CCCCXXXXIII (2006): 634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Grever and B. Waaldijk, Transforming the Public Sphere. The Dutch National Exhibition of Women’s Labor in 1898 (Durham, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. See also G. Spivak, ‘Three Women’s Texts and a Critique of Imperialism’, in In Other Worlds. Essays in Cultural Politics (New York, 1987)Google Scholar
  22. B. Waaldijk, ‘Colonial Constructions of a Dutch Women’s Movement: 1898’, in K. Röttger and H. Paul (eds), Differenzen in der Geschlechterdifferenz/Differences within Gender Studies. Aktuelle Perspektiven der Geschlechterforschung (Berlin, 1999), pp. 285–99.Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    See F. de Haan and A. van Drenth, The Rise of Caring Power. Elizabeth Fry and Josephine Butler in Britain and the Netherlands (Amsterdam, 1999);Google Scholar
  24. M. Grever and B. Waaldijk, ‘Women’s Labor on Display: Feminist Claims to Dutch Citizenship and Colonial Politics around 1900’, Journal of Women’s History, XV (2004): 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 22.
    See B. Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London, 1991); C. Hall ‘The Rule of Difference: Gender, Class and Empire in the Making of the 1832 Reform Act’, in Blom, Hagemann and Hall (eds), Gendered Nations, pp. 107–35, esp. p. 108 and R. Roach Pierson, ‘Nations: Gendered, Racialized, Crossed with Empire’, in Blom, Hagemann and Hall (eds), Gendered Nations, pp. 41–61, esp. pp. 41–2.Google Scholar
  26. 23.
    A. McClintock, Imperial Leather. Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest (New York and London, 1995);Google Scholar
  27. A.L. Stoler, Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power. Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule (Berkeley, 2002), pp. 22–40.Google Scholar
  28. 24.
    The basis for the argument stems from Gayle Rubin’s groundbreaking article ‘The Traffic in Women. Notes on the “Political Economy” of Sex’, in R.R. Raiter (ed.), Towards an Anthropology of Women (New York, 1975), pp. 157–210. In this article Rubin hardly discusses the ethnic, religious and other identities negotiated through the ‘traffic in women’. See F. Anthias and N. Yuval-Davis, Racialised Boundaries. Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-racist Struggle (London, 1995);Google Scholar
  29. N. Yuval-Davis, Gender and Nation (London, 1997);Google Scholar
  30. G. Mak, ‘Seksueel vreemdelingenverkeer’, in C. Bouw et al. (eds), Gaan &staan. Jaarboek voor vrouwengeschiedenis 21 (Amsterdam, 2001), pp. 101–22.Google Scholar
  31. 25.
    See for rape in the early modern period, R. Trumbach, Sex and the Gender Revolution. Vol. 1. Heterosexuality and the Third Gender in Enlightenment London (Chicago, 1998)Google Scholar
  32. L. Gowing, Common Bodies. Women, Touch and Power in Seventeenth-Century England (New Haven, 2003); for sexuality, the maidservant and the borders of class and gender in Victorian England, McClintock, Imperial Leather, pp. 75–131;Google Scholar
  33. for legislation, gender and nationality C.L. Bredbenner, A Nationality of Her Own: Women, Marriage, and the Law of Citizenship (Berkeley, 1998);Google Scholar
  34. for lynching, H.V. Carby, ‘On the Threshold of Woman’s Era. Lynching, Empire, and Sexuality in Black Feminist Theory’, Critical Inquiry, XII (1985): 262–77;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. for rape, war and nationalism, R. Harris, ‘The “Child of the Barbarian”: Rape, Race and Nationalism in France during the First World War’, Past and Present, CXLI (1993): 170–206;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. A. Stiglmayer (ed.), Mass Rape. The War against Women in Bosnia-Herzegovina (Lincoln, 1994).Google Scholar
  37. 30.
    G. Mak, Sporen van verplaatsing. Honderd jaar nieuwkomers in Overijssel (Kampen, 2000)Google Scholar
  38. G. Mak, ‘Verschil als uitgangspunt. Een inbreng van vrouwenstudies op het terrein van (lokale) migratiegeschiedenis’, Tijdschrift voor Sociale Geschiedenis, XXVI (2000): 343–62.Google Scholar
  39. 32.
    J. Tosh, The Pursuit of History. Aims, Methods and New Directions in the Study of Modern History, rev. 3rd edn (London, 2002), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Geertje Mak 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geertje Mak

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations