Abstract
At a November 1897 demonstration in Mile End, John Burns condemned London’s India Docks company for launching a compulsory friendly society, presenting their 4000 permanent employees with the choice of joining the company society and leaving their current societies, or losing their jobs. Burns, a prominent leader in the 1889 dock strike and future Labour member of parliament, told an approving crowd, ‘if ever the Docks Companies started on a bad job, and they had pursued a good many, this was the worst they ever went for’. He concluded ‘The scheme must be recalled or 1889 would be revived.’ The crowd at this ‘monster meeting’ cheered Burns frequently, but gave a cold reception to Sydney Holland, vice-chairman of the docks’ company, when he spoke. Holland asserted that the docks society had been created to end malingering and, in a statement greeted by ‘uproar,’ claimed ‘This is not to bind the men to us and prevent them striking.’1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Oddfellows’ Magazine, no. 297 (September 1899), pp. 325–7.
Eric Hopkins, Working-Class Self-Help in Nineteenth-Century England: Responses to Industrialization (New York: St. Martin’s Press — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1995), p. 227; P. H. J. H. Gosden, Self-Help: Voluntary Associations in the Nineteenth-Century (London: Batsford, 1973), p. 260; and Bentley B. Gilbert, ‘The Decay of Nineteenth-Century Provident Institutions and the Coming of Old Age Pensions in Great Britain’, Economic History Review, vol. 17 (1964–5), p. 553.
Gilbert, ‘The Decay of Nineteenth-Century Provident Institutions’, pp. 554–6; Ad Knotter et al., eds, Labour, Social Policy, and the Welfare State (Amsterdam: International Institute for Social History, 1997), pp. 8–11.
Abram de Swaan, In Care of the State: Health Care, Education, and Welfare in Europe and the U.S.A. in the Modern Era (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), p. 149.
Geoffrey Finlaison, Citizen, State, and Social Welfare 1830–1990 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).
James H. Treble, ‘The Attitudes of Friendly Societies Towards the Movement in Great Britain for State Pensions, 1878–1908’, International Review of Social History, vol. 15 no. 2 (1970), pp. 280–1.
David G. Green, Working-Class Patients and the Medical Establishment: Self-Help in Britain from the mid-Nineteenth Century to 1948 (Aldershot: Gower, 1985), pp. 21–3.
Rev. W. Walter Edwards, ‘The History, Functions, and Prospects of Friendly Societies’, Contemporary Review (January 1877), p. 203.
Gosden, Self-Help, p. 99.
Eric Hopkins, Industrialisation and Society: A Social History (London: Routledge, 2000), p. 21; and see Peter B. Evans et al., eds, Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 11–15.
Andrew Lang, Life and Letters of Sir Stafford Northcote, First Earl of Iddesleigh (Edinburgh: Constable,1890), pp. 45–6.
Friendly Societies’ Journal, nos. 3 (December 1854), p. 6, and 12 (September 1855), p. 11.
T. J. Hunt, The Life Story of T. J. Hunt (London: n.p., 1938), p. 56.
Leslie Hannah, Inventing Retirement: The Development of Occupational Pensions in Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), p. 13.
Friendly Societies’ Recorder, no. 88 (15 May 1897), p. 2; Charles Hardwick, The History, Present Position, and Social Importance of Friendly Societies (London: Routledge, 1859), pp. 334–5; J. Frome Wilkinson, The Friendly Society Movement: Its Origin, Rise and Growth (London: Longman, Green, 1886), pp. 188–9; Treble, ‘The Attitudes of Friendly Societies’, p. 278; and Gosden, Self-Help, p. 264.
Fraser, The Evolution of the British Welfare State, p. 140; Pat Thane, ‘The Working class and State “Welfare” in Britain, 1880–1914’, Historical Journal, vol. 27 no. 4 (1984), pp. 878–9; and Henry Pelling, PopularPolitics and Society in Late Victorian Britain (London: Macmillan, 1968), p. 2.
See Eileen Yeo and E. P. Thompson, eds, The Unknown Mayhew (New York: Schoken, 1972), and Henry Mayhew in London Labour and the London Poor, Victor Neuburg, ed. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985).
See Peter Keating, ed., Into Unknown England 1866–1913: Selections from the Social Explorers (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1976), and Hopkins, Industrialisation, pp. 127–8.
Carolyn Malone, ‘The Gendering of Dangerous Trades: Government Regulation of Women’s Work in the White Lead Trade in England, 1892–1898’, Journal of Women’s History, vol. 8 no. 1 (Spring 1996), pp. 15–35.
John Macnicol, The Politics of Retirement in Britain, 1878–1948 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 23.
Lynn Botelho and Pat Thane, eds, Women and Aging in British Society since 1500 (London: Longman, 2001), warn against seeking a golden age for the old, though there was a preindustrial sense that age brought wisdom. See also Richard B. Lee, The Dobe Ju/‘hoansi (Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace, 1993), for an example of a society in which age earned not only prestige but also power.
Gilbert, ‘The Decay of Nineteenth-Century Provident Institutions’, p. 562.
Isaac H. Mitchell, ‘Trade Unions and Thrift’, Charity Organisation Review, n.s., vol. 22, no. 128 (August 1907), p. 127.
C. G. Hanson, ‘Craft Unions, Welfare Benefits, and the Case for Trade Union Law Reform, 1867–75’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., vol. 28 no. 2 (May 1975), p. 255.
Miriam Cohen and Michael Hanagan, ‘The Politics of Gender and the Making of the Welfare State, 1900–1940: A Comparative Perspective’, Journal of Social History, vol. 24 no. 3 (Spring 1991), pp. 469–84.
Pat Thane, ‘Visions of Gender in the Making of the British Welfare State: The Case of Women in the British Labour Party and Social. Policy, 1906–1945’, in Gisela Bock and Pat Thane, eds, Maternity and Gender Policies: Women and the Rise of European Welfare States, 1880s–1950s (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 98–9.
Pat Thane ‘Non-Contributory versus Insurance Pensions 1878–1908’, in Pat Thane, ed., The Origins of British Social Policy (London: Croom Helm, 1978), pp. 103–4.
Doreen Collins, ‘The Introduction of Old Age Pensions in Great Britain’, Historical Journal, vol. 8 no. 2 (1965), pp. 258–9.
Friendly Societies’ Registrar, Return to the House of Commons for Circular Letter (London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1908).
Quoted in Melvin Richter, The Politics of Conscience: T. H. Green and his Age (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964), p. 289.
De Swaan, In Care of the State, pp. 148–9; and John O’Neill, ‘The Medicalization of Social Control’, Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, vol. 23 no. 3 (1986), p. 351.
Bentley B. Gilbert, The Evolution of National Insurance in Great Britain: The Origins of the Welfare State (orig. publ. 1966; repr. Aldershot: Gregg, 1993); John Grigg, Lloyd George: The People’s Champion 1902–1911 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978);Derek Fraser, The Evolution of the British Welfare State.
Don M. Creiger, Bounder from Wales: Lloyd George’s Career Before the First World War (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1976), p. 180.
Lord Beveridge, Voluntary Action. A Report on Methods of Social Advance (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1948), p. 75.
See for example the meetings held by the Leicester Bond Street Friendly Society in 1912: Leicestershire Record Office, DE 1884/2, Minute Book, 26 March 1912 and 21 May 1912.
Oddfellows’ Magazine, no. 414 Uune 1909), p. 186; and see Chris Wrigley, Lloyd George (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), p. 53, and Grigg, Lloyd George, p. 325.
Doncaster Archives, DS 9/1/4, Great Northern Railway Locomotive Sick Society, Minute Book, 1 April 1912.
Oddfellows’ Magazine, nos. 441 (September 1911), p. 555, and 447 (March 1912), p. 85.
Doncaster Archives, DS12/39, National United Order of Free Gardeners, ‘State Insurance’ (handbill, n.d.).
Sonya O. Rose, ‘Protective Labor Legislation in Nineteenth-Century Britain: Gender, Class, and the Liberal State’, in Laura L. Frader and Sonya O. Rose, eds, Gender and Class in Modern Europe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996), p. 206.
Gosden, Self-Help, p. 282.
Hunt, The Life Story of T. J. Hunt, p. 55, and Earls Colne Workers’ Education Association, A History of Earls Colne 1700–1974 (Earls Colne, Essex: WEA, 1975), p. 22.
Anthony D. Buckley, ’ “On the Club”: Friendly Societies in Ireland’, Irish Economic and Social History, vol. 14 (1987), pp. 55–7.
W. H. Dawson, ‘Friendly Societies’, Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (New York: Macmillan, 1935), p. 497.
Martin Pugh, The Making of Modern British Politics 1867–1939 (New York: St. Martin’s — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1982), p. 74.
Robert Roberts, The Classic Slum: Salford Life in the First Quarter of the Century (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986), p. 84n.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Simon Cordery
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cordery, S. (2003). Into the State. In: British Friendly Societies, 1750–1914. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598041_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598041_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43163-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59804-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)