Advertisement

Property and Propriety

Chapter
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter examines two interlinked issues in Trollope’s ‘London’: capitalism and gender relations. The first two sections trace his critiques of financial fraud and the abuse of credit from the 1850s to the 1870s. Then, an analysis of contemporary controversies about femininity and the legal and financial situation of women establishes the framework for my concluding discussion of women and property in The Way We Live Now.

Keywords

Prime Minister Married Woman Marriage Market Financial Fraud Marriage Settlement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    George Levine, ‘Can You Forgive Him? Trollope’s “Can You Forgive Her?” and the Myth of Realism’, VS, 18 (September 1974) 5–30; p. 7.Google Scholar
  2. John Hagan, ‘The Divided Mind of Anthony Trollope’, NCF, 14 (1959–60) 1–26.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Robert Tracy, Trollope’s Later Novels (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar
  4. Juliet McMaster, Trollope’s Palliser Novels: Theme and Pattern (Basingstoke, 1978).Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    James Kincaid, The Novels of Anthony Trollope (Oxford, 1977).Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    John Halperin, Trollope and Politics: A Study of the Pallisers and Others (Basingstoke, 1977), pp. 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. David Aitken, ‘Anthony Trollope on “the Genus Girl” ‘, NCF, 28 (1973–4) 417–34.Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    Jane Nardin, He Knew She Was Right: The Independent Woman in the Novels of Anthony Trollope (Carbondale, 1989), p. 18.Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    Ibid., p. 210 and passim;Deborah Denenholz Morse, Women in Trollope’s Palliser Novels (Ann Arbor, 1987).Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    Raymond Williams, Marxism and Literature (Oxford, 1977).Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    Bill Overton, The Unofficial Trollope (Brighton, 1982), p. 2 and passim.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Edmund Spenser, The Faerie Queene[1596], ed. A.C. Hamilton (1980), II. vii. 24.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trollope, Doctor Thorne [1858], ed. David Skilton (Oxford, 1980), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trollope, The Struggles of Brown, Jones, and Robinson[1861–2], ed. N. John Hall (Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    The Unknown Mayhew: Selections from the Morning Chronicle 1849–1850, ed. D. P. Thompson and Eileen Yeo (1971), pp. 201–2, 216–17, 221–3, 436–7.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alison Adburgham, Shops and Shopping 1800–1914 (1964), pp. 142–3.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    John Sutherland discusses sources for Melmotte in his edition of The Way We Live Now (Oxford, 1982), pp. xvii–xxi, and in TLS, 4 August 1995. Subsequent page references are to this edition.Google Scholar
  18. 21.
    J.G.A. Pocock, Virtue, Commerce, and History (Cambridge, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 23.
    See J.G.A. Pocock, Virtue, Commerce, and Historyand The Machiavellian Moment (Princeton, 1975), on which my summary is based.Google Scholar
  20. 25.
    Robin Gilmour, The Idea of the Gentleman in the Victorian Novel (1981).Google Scholar
  21. 27.
    Review of Lotta Schmidt and Other Stories, 21 September 1867, in David Skilton, Anthony Trollope and his Contemporaries (1972; Basingstoke, 1996), p. 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 28.
    Trollope: The Critical Heritage, ed. Donald Smalley (1969), pp. 407–9.Google Scholar
  23. 30.
    Trollope, An Autobiography[1883], ed. Michael Sadleir, Frederick Page and P.D. Edwards (Oxford, 1980), p. 360.Google Scholar
  24. 31.
    Ranald C. Michie, The London Stock Exchange: A History (Oxford, 1999), pp. 102–3.Google Scholar
  25. 32.
    Donald J. Olsen, The Growth of Victorian London (Harmondsworth, 1979), p. 119.Google Scholar
  26. 33.
    His prejudices are most apparent in his virulent attacks on Disraeli. It seems that in private life (as in his friendship with the Rothschilds) and in his fiction (e.g. his positive characterisation of Brehgert and Mme Max Goesler) Trollope’s tolerance towards individuals could transcend his mistrust of Jews in general, apparent enough in the racist descriptions of Rev. Joseph Emilius, the converted Jew. Like Disraeli, Emilius had, in Trollope’s view, reduced his religious affiliation to a matter of expediency: a ‘dishonesty’ of which Melmotte is also guilty. See also Jonathan Freedman, The Temple of Culture: Assimilation and Anti-Semitism in Literary Anglo-America (Oxford, 2000), pp. 73–88.Google Scholar
  27. 38.
    Manliness and Morality: Middle-class Masculinity in Britain and America 1800–1940, ed. J.A. Mangan and James Walvin (Manchester, 1987), pp. 1–4, 102–4.Google Scholar
  28. 45.
    John Hagan, ‘The Duke’s Children: Trollope’s Psychological Masterpiece’, NCF, 13 (1958–9) 1–21, remains the seminal account.Google Scholar
  29. 47.
    John Stuart Mill, On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. John Gray (Oxford, 1991), pp. 515–16.Google Scholar
  30. 49.
    The Dent Uniform Edition of Dickens’s Journalism, ed. Michael Slater etal, 4 vols. (1994–2000), III, pp. 42–9.Google Scholar
  31. 51.
    Letter, March 1854, quoted in Charles Dickens: A Critical Anthology, ed. Stephen Wall (Harmondsworth, 1970), p. 95.Google Scholar
  32. 53.
    Punch, 33 (3 October 1857) 140–1. On this 1857 controversy, see Harriet Martineau, ‘Female Industry’, Edinburgh Review, 109 (1859) 293–336, in ‘Criminals, Idiots, Women, and Minors’: Victorian Writing by Women on Women, ed. Susan Hamilton (Peterborough, 1995), pp. 29–70; pp. 46–7.Google Scholar
  33. 54.
    Compare ‘“Rotten-Row.” — Painted by G.H. Thomas’, ILN, 40 (17 May 1862) 516; and Eric Trudgill, Madonnas and Magdalens (1976), pp. 179–81.Google Scholar
  34. 55.
    This point is made in Mary Elizabeth Braddon, Aurora Floyd, ed. Richard Nemesvari and Lisa Surridge (Peterborough, 1998), pp. 24–6. William Fraser Rae’s review is quoted ibid., p. 587.Google Scholar
  35. 56.
    Michael Mason, The Making of Victorian Sexuality (Oxford, 1994), Ch. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 59.
    ‘Queen Bees or Working Bees?’, Saturday Review, 12 November 1859, quoted in Mary Poovey, Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England (Chicago, 1988), p. 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 60.
    Quoted in Woman Question, II, p. 148. For other contemporary comparisons of marriage to prostitution, see Mary Lyndon Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895 (Princeton, 1989), pp. 60–2.Google Scholar
  38. 61.
    [George Drysdale], The Elements of Social Science [1854/5, 1860], 23rd edition (1884), p. 357. See pp. 355–7, 364–6, 402–5.Google Scholar
  39. 64.
    Patricia Branca, Silent Sisterhood: Middle-Class Women in the Victorian Home (1975), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
  40. 66.
    W.R. Greg, ‘Why Are Women Redundant?’, National Review, 14 (1862) 434–60.Google Scholar
  41. 68.
    William Acton, Prostitution, [1857], 2nd edition, 1870, ed. Peter Fryer (New York, 1969), pp. 74, 121–5, quoting a letter and editorial commentary in The Times, May 1857.Google Scholar
  42. 70.
    Keith Thomas, ‘The Double Standard’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 20 (1959), p. 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 72.
    Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries on The Laws of England[1765–9], 19th edition (1836), I, p. 442.Google Scholar
  44. 73.
    This simplifies somewhat the legal complexities. For more details see Joan Perkin, Women and Marriage in Nineteenth-Century England (1989), pp. 10–19.Google Scholar
  45. 76.
    Frances Power Cobbe, ‘Criminals, Idiots, Women, and Minors’, Fraser’s Magazine, 78 (1868) 777–94; pp. 780, 788.Google Scholar
  46. 77.
    Mary Wollstonecraft, Vindication of the Rights of Woman, ed. Miriam Brody Kramnick [1792] (Harmondsworth, 1985), pp. 83–4, 100. Compare the comments on ‘power’ and ‘influence’ of Marion Reid and John Stuart Mill, in Woman Question, I, pp. 15–16 and II, p. 43.Google Scholar
  47. 78.
    Cicely Hamilton, Marriage as a Trade (1909), quoted in Carol Dyhouse, Feminism and the Family in England 1880–1939 (Oxford, 1989), p. 152. Little had changed since Wollstonecraft’s similar observation (p. 147).Google Scholar
  48. 80.
    Henry James, ‘Modern Women’, Nation, 22 October 1868, in LC1, p. 22.Google Scholar
  49. 86.
    Eliza Lynn Linton, ‘The Girl of the Period’, Saturday Review, 25 (1868) 339–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Alan David Robinson 2004

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations