Advertisement

Gendered London

Chapter
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

This second chapter on late Georgian London is concerned with gender relations in a society increasingly shaped by market forces. Throughout the book my analysis of London’s patriarchal culture encompasses three interconnected aspects: male fantasies about women; the constructions of femininity which both reflected women’s social situation and sought to shape it proactively; and the mobility and (in)dependence of women of the bourgeoisie. Within this framework, this chapter begins by discussing Blake. My provocative aim is to broaden historiographical discussion of gender in this period beyond its recent concentration on ‘polite’ discourses. Blake’s visions of London are important for their suggestive psychological insights into ‘hegemonic masculinity’ and, in their account of the demoralisation of semi-skilled outworkers, as a corrective to the complacency of genteel consumers. I then examine the interaction between men and women on London’s streets, arguing that, in addition to socioeconomic factors, consideration of child-rearing practices can illuminate the fantasies which influenced male behaviour. Finally, I consider the position of polite women as beneficiaries of the public culture created by commercialised leisure but as simultaneously constrained by the marriage market, by longstanding discrimination, and by ideological opposition to their unprecedented public visibility.

Keywords

Marriage Market Hegemonic Masculinity Fatal Tree Autonomous Selfhood Ideological Opposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Marilyn Butler, Romantics, Rebels and Reactionaries (Oxford, 1981), pp. 50–1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jon Mee, Dangerous Enthusiasm (Oxford, 1992), pp. 220–4. Google Scholar
  3. See Stewart Crehan, Blake in Context (Dublin, 1984); Google Scholar
  4. Michael Ferber, The Social Vision of William Blake (Princeton, 1985);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Iain McCalman, Radical Underworld (Cambridge, 1988)Google Scholar
  6. E.P. Thompson, Witness against the Beast (Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar
  7. 3.
    William Godwin, Enquiry Concerning Political Justice[1793; 3rd edition 1798], ed. Isaac Kramnick (Harmondsworth, 1976), p. 182; cf. pp. 148–9, 580–1.Google Scholar
  8. 4.
    The Poems of William Blake, ed. W.H. Stevenson (1971), pp. 60–1, 216, 219. Subsequent references to Blake’s prophetic books in this edition use the following abbreviations: FZ (Four Zoas), J (Jerusalem), MHH (Marriage of Heaven and Hell), M (Milton), U (Urizen). Google Scholar
  9. The influence on his early work of the neighbourhoods in which Blake lived is traced in Stanley Gardner, The Tyger, the Lamb, and the Terrible Desart (1998).Google Scholar
  10. 6.
    Blake, Complete Writings, ed. Geoffrey Keynes (Oxford, 1979), p. 393.Google Scholar
  11. 8.
    My interpretation is inevitably partial, given the recalcitrant idiosyncrasies of Blake’s syncretic imagination and at times arcane sources. For an overview, see Leslie Tannenbaum, Biblical Tradition in Blake’s Early Prophecies (Princeton, 1982) and the edition of The Book of Urizenby Kay Parkhurst Easson and Roger R. Easson (1979), pp. 94–7.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Urizen’s attempt to kill Fuzon is described in the Book of Ahania, 1–131, in Poems, pp. 269–74. Earlier, in UrizenCh. VII, Los binds Ore, in a typological parallel to Laius and Œdipus, to Abraham and Isaac, and to Zeus and Prometheus. The link between these oedipal anxieties and revolutionary politics is indicated in Ronald Paulson, Representations of Revolution (1789–1820) (New Haven, 1983), p. 24.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    Christopher Hill, Antichrist in Seventeenth-Century England (1971), pp. 114–15. On late eighteenth-century millenarianism, Google Scholar
  14. See Clarke Garrett, Respectable Folly (Baltimore, 1975) Google Scholar
  15. And J.F.C. Harrison, The Second Coming (1979).Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    See The London Encyclopaedia, ed. Ben Weinreb and Christopher Hibbert (1987).Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    L.D. Schwarz, London in the Age of Industrialisation (Cambridge, 1992), Ch. 7; CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iorwerth Prothero, Artisans and Politics in Early Nineteenth-Century London (Baton Rouge, 1979), Chs. 4, 11.Google Scholar
  19. 22.
    Anna Clark, The Struggle for the Breeches: Gender and the Making of the British Working Class (Berkeley, 1995), pp. 119–31.Google Scholar
  20. 23.
    On Blake’s depictions of women, see the essays by Susan Fox and Alicia Ostriker in Essential Articles for the Study of William Blake, 1970–1984, ed. Nelson Hilton (Hamden, Conn., 1986); Google Scholar
  21. And the bibliographical survey in Helen P. Bruder, William Blake and the Daughters of Albion (Basingstoke, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 26.
    Boswell’s London Journal, 1762–1763, ed. Frederick A. Pottle (1950), p. 216.Google Scholar
  23. 29.
    Thomas De Quincey, Confessions of an English Opium Eater[1821], ed. Alethea Hayter (Harmondsworth, 1975), p. 50.Google Scholar
  24. 30.
    Charles Lamb, letter 15 February 1802, in The Letters of Charles and Mary Lamb, ed. Edwin W. Marrs, Jr. (Ithaca, NY, 1975–), II, p. 57.Google Scholar
  25. 31.
    Don Juan, XI, 30, cancelled stanza, in Lord Byron: Don Juan, ed. T. G. Steffan, E. Steffan and W. W. Pratt (Harmondsworth, 1977), p. 696.Google Scholar
  26. 32.
    Michael Mason, The Making of Victorian Sexuality (Oxford, 1994), p. 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 36.
    Laurence Sterne, A Sentimental Journey Through France and Italy[1768], ed. Graham Petrie (Harmondsworth, 1975), pp. 73–8, 89–92, 115–18, 120–2.Google Scholar
  28. 37.
    M. Dorothy George, Hogarth to Cruikshank: Social Change in Graphic Satire (1967), fig. 65.Google Scholar
  29. 38.
    For reproductions, see Susan P. Casteras, Images of Victorian Womanhood in English Art (Rutherford, 1987) fig. 112; Google Scholar
  30. And Celina Fox, Londoners (1987), p. 167. Although Hunt’s painting is signed and dated 1881, the costume depicted is of the period 1858–60.Google Scholar
  31. 39.
    Penelope J. Corfield, ‘Walking the City Streets: The Urban Odyssey in Eighteenth-Century England’, Journal of Urban History, 16 (February 1990), pp. 138, 164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Diana Donald, The Age of Caricature: Satirical Prints in the Reign of George III (New Haven, 1996), p. 224 lists prints depicting aristocratic rakes.Google Scholar
  33. 43.
    For alternative interpretations, see Lawrence Kramer, ‘Gender and Sexuality in The Prelude:The Question of Book Seven’, ELH, 54 (Fall 1987) 619–37; CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. And Mary Jacobus, Romanticism, Writing and Sexual Difference (Oxford, 1989), pp. 206–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 45.
    John Worthen, The Gang: Coleridge, the Hutchinsons and the Wordsworths in 1802 (New Haven, 2001), pp. 121–4, 225–34.Google Scholar
  36. 48.
    Wordsworth was seven when his mother died and he was separated from his sister, Dorothy, whom he did not see again for nine years. The traumatic impact on Wordsworth of his mother’s death is the theme of Richard J. Onorato, The Character of the Poet: Wordsworth inThe Prelude’ (Princeton, 1971), with whose interpretation of the child at Sadler’s Wells I concur.Google Scholar
  37. 49.
    William Wordsworth, The Poems, ed. John O. Hayden, 2 vols. (Harmondsworth, 1977), I, p. 364.Google Scholar
  38. 50.
    1799 Prelude, II, 267–310; The Prelude: 1799, 1805, 1850, ed. Jonathan Wordsworth, M.H. Abrams and Stephen Gill (New York, 1979), pp. 20–1.Google Scholar
  39. 51.
    Clark, Struggle for the Breeches, pp. 48–62; Judith R. Walkowitz, Prostitution and Victorian Society (Cambridge, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 52.
    ‘Jenny’, in Rossetti’s Poems, ed. Oswald Doughty (1961), pp. 67–8.Google Scholar
  41. 53.
    See Dorothy Dinnerstein, The Mermaid and the Minotaur (New York, 1976); Google Scholar
  42. Nancy Chodorow, The Reproduction of Mothering (Berkeley, 1978); Google Scholar
  43. Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice (Cambridge, Mass., 1982); Google Scholar
  44. Jessica Benjamin, The Bonds of Love (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
  45. 54.
    Elisabeth Badinter, Die Identität des Mannes (München, 1993), Erster Teil; Chodorow, Reproduction of Mothering, Ch. 11.Google Scholar
  46. 55.
    Anne McClintock, Imperial Leather (New York, 1995), p. 29. The equivalent in orthodox Judaism would be infant circumcision, excising the fleshly trace (the vagina-like foreskin) of an original bisexuality (Badinter, Die Identität des Mannes, p. 71).Google Scholar
  47. 56.
    Quoted in Paul Langford, A Polite and Commercial People: England 1727–1783 (Oxford, 1989), p. 606.Google Scholar
  48. 57.
    On ‘hegemonic masculinity’, see Tim Carrigan, Bob Connell and John Lee, ‘Toward a New Sociology of Masculinity’, in The Making of Masculinities, ed. Harry Brod (Boston, 1987), pp. 91–5, and Connell’s later work.Google Scholar
  49. 58.
    Leonore Davidoff, ‘Class and Gender in Victorian England’, in Sex and Class in Women’s History, ed. Judith L. Newton, Mary P. Ryan and Judith R. Walkowitz (1983), pp. 23–30.Google Scholar
  50. 59.
    Theresa McBride, ‘“As the Twig is Bent”: the Victorian Nanny’, in The Victorian Family: Structure and Stresses, ed. Anthony S. Wohl (1978), p. 51.Google Scholar
  51. 60.
    Sigmund Freud, Briefe an Wilhelm Fließ 1887–1904, ed. Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson (Frankfurt a.M., 1986), pp. 290, 288.Google Scholar
  52. 61.
    McClintock arrives at similar conclusions in Imperial Leather, Ch. 2. On Munby, see Derek Hudson, Munby: Man of Two Worlds (1974); Davidoff, ‘Class and Gender’, pp. 30–64; and McClintock, Imperial Leather, Chs. 2 and 3. Victorian marriages could, however, be sexually much more passionate than the façade of propriety suggested. Google Scholar
  53. See Peter Gay, The Bourgeois Experience: Victoria to Freud, vol. 1, The Education of the Senses (New York, 1984); Mason, The Making of Victorian Sexuality.Google Scholar
  54. 62.
    Quoted in McClintock, Imperial Leather, p. 87, from Jonathan Gathorne-Hardy, The Rise and Fall of the British Nanny (1972), p. 78.Google Scholar
  55. 63.
    Amanda Vickery, The Gentleman’s Daughter: Women’s Lives in Georgian England (New Haven, 1998), Ch. 7.Google Scholar
  56. 64.
    Even conservative commentators regarded this as self-evident. See Hannah More, ‘The White Slave Trade’ (1805), in Women’s Writing, 1778–1838, ed. Fiona Robertson (Oxford, 2001), pp. 157–62.Google Scholar
  57. 65.
    Langford, A Polite and Commercial People, pp. 600–7; Linda Colley, Britons: Forging the Nation 1707–1837 (1996), pp. 254–6, 260–3.Google Scholar
  58. 66.
    G.J. Barker-Benfield, The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Chicago 1992), Ch. 1.Google Scholar
  59. 67.
    Elaine Showalter, The Female Malady: Women, Madness and English Culture, 1830–1980 (1987).Google Scholar
  60. 68.
    Thomas Laqueur, Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (Cambridge, Mass., 1990).Google Scholar
  61. 69.
    On this final point, see Jeff Nunokawa, The Afterlife of Property: Domestic Security and the Victorian Novel (Princeton, 1994).Google Scholar
  62. 70.
    See John Tosh, A Man’s Place: Masculinity and the Middle-Class Home in Victorian England (New Haven, 1999), Chs. 1 and 2, and pp. 68, 80–1, 86–9, 93.Google Scholar
  63. 71.
    Harriet Guest, Small Change: Women, Learning, Patriotism, 1750–1810 (Chicago, 2000), pp. 236–7, 251, and Ch. 13.Google Scholar
  64. 72.
    Amanda Vickery, ‘Golden Age to Separate Spheres? A Review of the Categories and Chronology of English Women’s History’, Historical Journal, 36.2 (1993) 383–414. The following sentence is based also on her Gentleman’s Daughter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Alan David Robinson 2004

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations