Skip to main content

Abstract

‘I will not allow books to prove anything’,1 says Anne Elliot to Captain Harville in Jane Austen’s Persuasion (1818). In the teeth of this statement, I will argue here that the appearance of a book in Austen’s novels is, in fact, always important. Examining Austen’s use of books and literary references in Mansfield Park within the context of late eighteenth-century conduct-book assumptions about reading (represented here by the works of Hannah More) I argue throughout that Austen’s use of other texts and authors is never ideologically neutral or artistically unimportant. Of particular interest are ‘spectral texts’ — literary works that hover in the margins of the novel, not always directly acknowledged, but always reflecting or refracting some of Mansfield Park’s central concerns about ethics and morality — and the ways in which those texts enrich and complicate the relationship between narrative voice, heroine and reader. Under consideration throughout is reading matter, but more importantly, how Jane Austen makes reading matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jane Austen, Persuasion(1818), ed. John Davie (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jocelyn Harris’s analysis of the links between Sir Charles Grandison and Mansfield Park in Jane Austen’s Art of Memory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bharat Tandon’s discussion of Austen’s ‘conversations’ with literary figures in Jane Austen and the Art of Conversation (London: Anthem, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lionel Trilling’s ‘Mansfield Park’, in The Opposing Self Nine Essays in Criticism (London: Secker and Warburg, 1955), pp. 206–30;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Avrom Fleishman’s A Reading ofMansfield Park:An Essay of Critical Synthesis (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1967);

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Walton Litz’s Jane Austen: A Study of her Artistic Development (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967);

    Google Scholar 

  7. Douglas Bush’s Jane Austen (New York: Macmillan, 1975);

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mary Poovey’s The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984);

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marilyn Butler’s Jane Austen and the War of Ideas (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987);

    Google Scholar 

  10. Claudia L. Johnson’s Jane Austen: Women, Politics and the Novel (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hannah More, Strictures on the Modern System of Female Education, 2 vols (New York and London: Garland Publishing, 1974), II, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hannah More, Coelebs in Search of a Wife, ed. Mary Waldron (Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1995), p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jane Austen to James Stanier Clarke, Monday, 11 December 1815, in Jane Austen’s Letters, ed. Deirdre Le Faye (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 306.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mary Lascelles, Jane Austen and her Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974), p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jane Austen, Mansfield Park, ed. James Kinsley [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990], p. 145).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mary Russell Mitford to Mrs Hofland (undated, but between February 1819 and October 1820), in Letters of Mary Russell Mitford, ed. Henry Chorley, 2 vols (London: Richard Bentley … Son, 1872), I, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  17. James Edward Austen-Leigh, A Memoir of Jane Austen (London: Folio Society, 1989), p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Isobel Grundy, ‘Jane Austen and Literary Traditions’, in The Cambridge Companion to Jane Austen, ed. Edward Copeland and Juliet McMaster (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  19. George Crabbe, Preface to Tales (London: J. Hatchard, 1813).

    Google Scholar 

  20. George Crabbe, ‘The Confidant’ (Tale XVI) in Tales (London: J. Harchard, 1813), pp. 285–6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. William Cowper, The Task in The Task and Selected Other Poems, ed. James Sambrook (London and New York: Longman, 1994),

    Google Scholar 

  22. William Cowper, The Correspondence of William Cowper, ed. Thomas Wright, 4 vols (London: Hodder … Stoughton, 1904), II, p. 252.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Butler, Jane Austen (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987), pp. 232–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E.M. Butler, ‘Mansfield Park and Kotzebue’s Lovers’ Vows’, MLR, 28 (1933), 326–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dvora Zelicovici, The Inefficacy of Lovers’ Vows’, ELH, 50 (1983), 532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brian Wilkie, ‘Structural Layering in Jane Austen’s Problem Novels’, Nineteenth-Century Literature, 46 (1992), 519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Katie Halsey

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halsey, K. (2005). Spectral Texts in Mansfield Park. In: Batchelor, J., Kaplan, C. (eds) British Women’s Writing in the Long Eighteenth Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595972_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics