Abstract
Despite Genet’s claims of ‘impossibility’, the ‘ballet’ of Divine’s death in Our Lady of the Flowers has provoked various choreographic responses, particularly from avant-garde dance practitioners. In Japan and in Great Britain in the 1960s and 1970s, two seminal works based on Genet’s novel appeared: Tatsumi Hijikata and Kazuo Ohno’s Divinariane in 1960, which was reworked into Admiring La Argentina in 1977, and Lindsay Kemp’s Flowers: A Pantomime for Jean Genet, performed between 1968 and 1974. The word seminal, with its etymological association with semen, is appropriate when discussing these performances, since both of them draw upon Genet’s connection between choreography and male masturbation. Genet writes the solo embodiment of erotic memories as a kind of dance, and both Ohno and Kemp manifest this in their work. These choreographies also use the character of Divine to present complex images of masculinity, ranging from the solipsistic artist to the gregarious drag queen tragedian. Just as Genet’s Divine moves between ‘he’ and ‘she’ in Our Lady of the Flowers, so Kemp and Ohno redeploy masculinity and femininity in their dances, presenting an androgynous subject who refuses stable gender identities.1
Since Divine is dead, the poet may sing her, may tell her legend, the Saga, the annals of Divine. The Divine Saga should be danced, mimed, with subtle directions. Since it is impossible to make a ballet of it, I am forced to use words that are weighed down with precise ideas, but I shall try to lighten them with expressions that are trivial, empty, hollow and invisible.
(Genet, 1990, p. 61)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works cited
Aloff, M. ‘Reviews’, Dance Magazine (January 1982), 45–50.
Barber, S. ‘Butoh’s First Images’, 20 November 2000 <http://www.poeticinhalation. com/butoh.html>.
— Jean Genet (London: Reaktion Books, 2004).
Bersani, L. Homos (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).
Burnside, F. ‘Words versus Gestures’, Dance Theatre Journal, 5: 3b (1987), 16–17.
Genet, J. Our Lady of the Flowers, trans. B. Frechtman (London: Faber and Faber, 1990).
Fragments of the Artwork, trans. C. Mandell (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).
Innes, C. Avant Garde Theatre1892–1992 (London and New York: Routledge, 1993).
Jarman, D. ‘Foreword’, in A. Wilms, Lindsay Kemp & Company (London: Gay Men’s Press, 1987), pp. 5–8.
Meisner, N. ‘Lindsay Kemp: How the Lost Boy of Dance Found his Feet’, Independent, 28 January 2002, p. 40.
National Review of Live Art, Publicity Material, February 2002.
Odenthal, J. ‘The Human Being Is Not the Centre Of The Universe—On The 90th Birthday Of Kazuo Ohno’, Ballet International (November 1996), 26–7.
Ohno, K. and Y. Ohno. Kazuo Ohno’s World: From Without and Within, trans. John Barrett (Hanover, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2004).
Robertson, A. Tied Piper: Lindsay Kemp talks to Allen Robertson’, Dance Now, 5: 3 (1996), 36–40.
Senelick, L. The Changing Room: Sex, Drag and Theatre (London and New York: Routledge, 2000).
Viala, J. and N. Masson-Sekine. Butoh: Shades of Darkness (Tokyo: Shufunotomo, 1988).
White, E. Genet (London: Chatto & Windus, 1993).
Williams, P. ‘Wilde Flowers: The Lindsay Kemp Company at the Roundhouse’, Dance and Dancers (May 1977), 34–5.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Martin Hargreaves
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hargreaves, M. (2006). Dancing the Impossible: Kazuo Ohno, Lindsay Kemp and Our Lady of the Flowers . In: Finburgh, C., Lavery, C., Shevtsova, M. (eds) Jean Genet: Performance and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595439_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595439_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54447-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59543-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)