Skip to main content

Aid Allocation and Aid Effectiveness: An Empirical Analysis

  • Chapter
Development Aid

Part of the book series: Studies in Development Economics and Policy ((SDEP))

Abstract

Why do some poor countries receive so much aid, and others so little? Humanitarian, commercial, political and strategic motives are usually identified as the main factors driving the aid allocation process. This is consistent with policy statements, especially from the major donors, which assert that aid is motivated by a humanitarian concern to promote development and alleviate need, especially in the most deprived countries, but at the same time also by commercial, political and strategic self-interest. The vast empirical literature dealing with the determinants of aid allocation clearly concludes that donors pursue political, economic and strategic interests in inter-country aid allocation, especially with regard to bilateral aid allocation of the larger donors, and that developmental or humanitarian concerns, such as the reduction of poverty, receive a relatively low or even zero weight in this process (see McGillivray, 2004, for a comprehensive discussion).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alesina, A. and D. Dollar (2000) ‘Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?’, Journal of Economic Growth, 5: 33–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and B. Weder (2002) ‘Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?’, American Economic Review, 92 (4): 1126–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthélemy, J. C. and A. Tichit (2004) ‘Bilateral Donors’ Aid Allocation Decisions: A Three-Dimensional Panel Analysis’, International Review of Economics and Finance, 13 (3): 253–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon, J. (2003) ‘Poverty Efficient Aid Allocations: Collier/Dollar Revisited’, Economic and Statistics Analysis Unit Working Paper 2, London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnside, C. and D. Dollar (2000) ‘Aid, Policies and Growth’, American Economic Review, 90 (4): 847–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canavire, G., P. Nunnenkamp, R. Thiele and L. Triveno (2005) ‘Assessing the Allocation of Aid: Development Concerns and the Self-Interest of Donors’, Working Paper 1253, Kiel: Kiel Institute for World Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassen, R. (1994) Does Aid Work? (2nd edn), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D. and V. Levin (2004) ‘The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984–2002’, Policy Research Working Paper 3299, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House Evaluation, Democracy index. Available at: www.freedomhouse.org.

  • Gates, S. and A. Hoeffler (2004) ‘Global Aid Allocation: Are Nordic Donors Different?’, CSAE Working Paper 2004–34, Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gounder, R. (1999) ‘Modelling Aid Motivation Using Time Series Data: The Case of Papua New Guinea’, Oxford Development Studies, 27 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gounder, R. and K. Sen (1999) ‘What Motivates Foreign Aid: A Case Study of Australia Aid to Indonesia’, Journal of Developing Areas, 33 (3): 379–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF (2004) Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook, 2004, The DOTs Database (CD-Rom), Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isopi, A. and F. Mattesini (2006) ‘Should Aid Reward Good Outcomes? Optimal Contracts in a Repeated Moral Hazard Model of Foreign Aid Allocation’, CEIS Working Paper 236, University of Rome, ‘Tor Vergata’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundborg, P. (1998) ‘Foreign Aid and International Support as a Gift Exchange’, Economics and Politics, 10 (2): 127–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maizels, A. and M. Nissanke (1984) ‘Motivations for Aid to Developing Countries’, World Development, 12 (9): 879–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrotas, G. and E. Villanger (2006) ‘Multilateral Aid Agencies and Strategic Donor Behaviour’, WIDER Discussion Paper 2006/02, Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, M. (2003) ‘Aid Effectiveness and Aid Selectivity: Integrating Multiple Objectives into Aid Allocations’, Paper presented at the joint OECD— DAC/Development Centre Experts’ Seminar on Aid Effectiveness and Aid Selectivity: Integrating Multiple Objectives into Aid Allocations, March. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, M. (2004) ‘Descriptive and Prescriptive Analyses of Aid Allocation: Approaches, Issues and Consequences’, International Review of Economics and Finance, 13 (3): 275–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, M. and E. Oczkowski (1992) ‘A Two-Part Sample Selection Model of British Bilateral Aid Allocation’, Applied Economics, 24: 1311–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, M. and H. White (1993) ‘Explanatory Studies of Aid Allocation among Developing Countries: A Critical Survey’, ISS Working Paper 148, The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, R. and R. Little (1978) ‘The French Aid Relationship: A Foreign Policy Model of Distribution of French Bilateral Aid, 1964–1970’, Development and Change, 9 (3): 459–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, R. and R. Little (1979) ‘The US Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and the Donor Interest Models’, Political Studies, 27 (2): 236–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, P. (1981) ‘Models of Aid Allocation Process: A Comment on McKinley and Little’, Political Studies, 29: 245–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, L. (2005) ‘Focus-Pocus? Thinking Critically about Whether Aid Organizations Should Do Fewer Things in Fewer Countries’, Development and Change, 36 (3): 425–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2003a) ‘What Factors Determine the Allocation of Aid by Arab Countries and Multilateral Agencies?’, Journal of Development Studies, 39 (4): 134–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2003b) The Pattern of Aid Giving: The Impact of Good Governance on Development Assistance, New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Penn World Tables. Available at: http://webhost.bridgew.edu/baten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2004) ‘An Index of Donor Performance’, Working Paper 42, Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraeder, P., S. Hook and B. Taylor (1998) ‘Clarifying the Aid Puzzle: A Comparison of American, Japanese, French and Swedish Aid Flows’, World Politics, 50: 294–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIPRI (n.d.) ‘SIPRI Arms Transfers Database’, Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Available at: www.sipri.org/contents/webmaster/databases

  • Svensson, J. (2000) ‘Why Conditional Aid Does Not Work and What Can Be Done About It?’. Journal of Development Economics. 70 (2): 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbull, W. and H. Wall (1994) ‘Estimating Aid-Allocation Criteria with Panel Data’, Economic Journal, 104 (425): 876–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (various years) Human Development Indicators, New York: UNDP. Available at: www//hdr.undp.org .

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (2004) ‘Trends in the Volume and Allocation of Official Flows from Donor Countries’, International Review of Economics and Finance, 13 (3): 733–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (various years) World Development Indicators, Washington, DC: World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (various years) Annual Review of Development Effectiveness, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

George Mavrotas (Chief Economist of the Global Development Network (GDN)Mark McGillivray (Chief Economist of the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID)

Copyright information

© 2009 United Nations University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Isopi, A., Mavrotas, G. (2009). Aid Allocation and Aid Effectiveness: An Empirical Analysis. In: Mavrotas, G., McGillivray, M. (eds) Development Aid. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595163_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics