Abstract
Whenever devolution within the United Kingdom has been proposed, the ‘English Question’ has always emerged as its inevitable corollary. If there is greater home rule for the rest of the United Kingdom, so the argument goes, should a similar ‘solution’ not also apply to, or within, England? Should England as a whole have its own institutionalised political voice or, alternatively, should it be divided into devolved units of government? Since 1998, England has been the gaping hole in a devolution settlement that has still affected only 15 per cent of the UK population (or just over a quarter if the strengthening of citywide governance for London is deemed a devolutionary measure). Until recently, the English barely seemed to care but that may be starting to change. In the face of recent evidence that the people of Scotland and Wales have an appetite for more nationalist governments and further autonomy, there is a growing perception that the English may be ‘losing out’. Clear answers to the English Question, however, seem as far away as ever; not least because of the bewildering array of ostensible solutions on offer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Alan Harding, Robert Hazell, Martin Burch and James Rees
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harding, A., Hazell, R., Burch, M., Rees, J. (2008). Answering the English Question. In: Hazell, R. (eds) Constitutional Futures Revisited. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595088_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595088_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30622-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59508-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)