Abstract
Business firms in india have not received much atten-tion from economic historians. Most of the literature available belongs to the genre of firm histories, the writing of which has generally been commissioned by the firms themselves and is therefore often apologetic in nature, if not hagiographical. Of modern Indian business firms, however, the house of Tata is undoubtedly the one which has received the most extensive coverage. One might well ask why add a few more pages to the already abundant literature on this best-known and most studied of all Indian firms. I cannot claim to have discovered anything really new about the Tatas. However, I find the existing literature, although informative and often insightful, either too much informed by a ‘heroic’ conception of entrepreneurship, or too exclusively preoccupied with microanalysis of the specific growth process of particular companies, like the Empress Mills or Tata Iron and Steel Co. (TISCO). It is not my intention to belittle the extraordinary feat of entrepreneurship represented by the emergence of such a firm in the specific context of colonial India. But I think one has to go beyond that kind of statement. Some synthetic survey of the firm across a time span of over a century, aiming at situating it within the general context of Indian entrepreneurial history and attempting to link it to macroeconomic trends appears to be needed.
From B. Stein and S. Subrahmanyam (eds), Institutions and Economic Change in South Asia (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 237–48.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
B.R. Tomlinson, ‘Colonial Firms and the Decline of Colonialism in Eastern India 1914–1947’, Modern Asian Studies 15: 3 (1981), pp. 455–86.
C.A. Bayly, Rulers, Townsmen and Bazaars (Cambridge, 1983), p. 376.
SeeD. Tripathi, The Dynamics of a Tradition: Kasturbhai Lalbhai and His Entrepreneurship (Delhi, 1981), p. 76.
See D. Kumar (ed.), The Cambridge Economic History of India, vol. 2 (Cambridge, 1983), p. 556.
F.R. Harris, Jamsetji Nusserwanji Tata: A Chronicle of His Life (Bombay, 1958, 2nd edition).
R. Chandavarkar, The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and the Working Classes in Bombay, 1900–1940 (Cambridge, 1993).
B. Chatterji, Trade, Tariffs and Empire: Lancashire and British Policy in India 1919–1939 (Delhi, 1992).
C. Markovits, ‘Les hommes d’affaires Indiens et le mouvement nationaliste de 1931 à1947’, unpublished doctoral thesis, Paris, 1987.
H.L. Erdman, The Swatantra Party and Indian Conservatism (Cambridge, 1967).
S.A. Kochanek, Business and Politics in India (Berkeley, 1974).
Copyright information
© 2008 Claude Markovits
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Markovits, C. (2008). The Tata Paradox. In: Merchants, Traders, Entrepreneurs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594869_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594869_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30234-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59486-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)