Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Michel Foucault ((MFL))

  • 3864 Accesses

Abstract

[YOU KNOW] FREUD’S QUOTATION: “Acheronta movebo.”1 Well, I would like to take the theme for this year’s lectures from another, less well-known quotation from someone who, generally speaking at least, is also less well-known, the English Statesman Walpole,2 who, with reference to his way of governing, said: “Quieta non movere,”3 “Let sleeping dogs lie.” ∼ In a sense, this is the opposite of Freud. In fact, this year I would like to continue with what I began to talk about last year, that is to say, to retrace the history of what could be called the art of government. You recall the strict sense in which I understood “art of government,” since in using the word “to govern” I left out the thousand and one different modalities and possible ways that exist for guiding men, directing their conduct, constraining their actions and reactions, and so on. Thus I left to one side all that is usually understood, and that for a long time was understood, as the government of children, of families, of a household, of souls, of communities, and so forth. I only considered, and again this year will only consider the government of men insofar as it appears as the exercise of political sovereignty.

Questions of method. ∼ Suppose universals do not exist. ∼ Summaiy of the previous years lectures: the limited objective of the government of raison d’Etat (external politics) and unlimited objective of the police state (internal politics). Law as principle of the external limitation of raison d’Etat. ∼ Perspective of this years lectures: political economy as principle of the internal limitation of governmental reason. ∼ What is at stake in this research: the coupling of a set ofpractices and a regime of truth and the effects of its inscription in reality What is liberalism?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Footnotes

  1. John Locke, The Second Treatise of Government, ch. 7, “Of Political or Civil Society” in Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960) p. 361.

    Google Scholar 

  2. On this point, see P. Rosanvallon, Le Capitalisme utopique (Paris: Le Seuil, 1979) pp. 68–69 (republished with the title Le Libéralisme économique. Histoire de l’idée de marché, Paris: Le Seuil, 1989). Foucault acknowledged this “important book” in Spring 1979, in the Course Summary (see below, p. 320), and perhaps he was familiar with its content when he was giving these lectures.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Parts Two and Three. On these stages of social development, Foucault had read, in particular, R.L. Meek, Economics and Ideology and other essays (London: Chapman & Hall, 1967) pp. 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johann Heinrich Jung-Stilling (1740–1817), Die Grundlehre der Staatswirthschaft (Marbourg: 1792 [modern edition, Königstein/Ts: Scriptor-Verlag, 1978]) p. 680: “Das gesellschaftliche Leben ist dreifach: 1) bezieht es sich auf die Famille oder auf das häusliche Verhältnis, 2) auf das Zusammenwohnen der Hausväter oder auf die bürgerliche Gesellschaft, und 3) auf das Verhältnis gegen die regierende Gewalt und ihre Gesetze, das ist: auf die Staatsgesellschaft”; quoted by M. Riedel, “Gesellschaft bürgerliche” p. 753.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carl Daniel Heinrich Bensen (1761–1805), System der reinen und angewandten Staatslehre für Juristen und Kameralisten (Eerlangen: Palm, 1804) t. I: “Unsere Staaten und ihre Bewohner haben nur allmählich ihre jetzige Form erhalten. Von der häuslichen Gesellschaft rückte nämlich das Menschengeschlecht zur bürgerlichen und von dieser zur Staatsgesellshaft fort”; quoted by M. Riedel, “Gesellschaft bürgerliche” p. 754.

    Google Scholar 

  6. August Ludwig von Schlözer (1735–1809), Stats-Anzeigen (Göttingen: 1792) t. 17, p. 354: “Alle bisher bekannt gewordene Menschenhaufen alter, mittler und neuer Zeiten, leben in den 3 Arten häuslicher Gesellschaft. Alle ohne Ausnahme alle, leben in bürgerlicher Gesellschaft. Und bei weitem die allermeisten, wenngleich nicht alle, leben in Staats-Gesellschaft, oder unter Obrigkeit”; quoted by M. Riedel, “Gesellschaft bürgerliche” p. 754. See also, G. Gurvitch, Traité de sociologie (Paris: PUF, 1958) pp. 31–32, consulted by Foucault: “The followers of Leibniz—Nettelbladt in particular—in simplifying his ideas, will distinguish regimen societatis, or bloc of varied groups of activity, preferably economic, from regimen civitatis or bloc of local groups culminating in the state. This was the source of the opposition between civil and economic society (bürgerliche Gesellschaft’) and the state. Formulated for the first time by the German historian and statistician, A.L. Schlötzer, this opposition was the object of meditation for a number of German, French, and British thinkers in the second half of the eighteenth and the first half of the nineteenth century.”

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.W.F. Hegel, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, 3rd Part, 2nd section, §182–256 (Berlin: Librairie Nicolaï, 1821); French translation by R. Derathé, Principes de la philosophie du droit (Paris: Vrin, 1975) pp. 215–217; English translation by T.M. Knox, Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967) pp. 122–155. See M. Riedel, “Gesellschaft bürgerliche” pp. 779–783, as well as J. Hyppolite, “La conception hégélienne de l’État,” Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, 1947, t. II, p. 146, and B. Quelquejeu, La Volonté dans la philosophie de Hegel (Paris: Le Seuil, 1973), which are referred to in Foucault’s notes.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Paine, Common Sense Addressed to the Inhabitants of America (Philadelphia: W. & T. Bradford, 1776; Peterborough, Ontario/Plymouth: Broadview Editions, 2004) p. 47. See H.K. Girvetz, From Wealth to Welfare (Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1950) p. 44, that Foucault read in preparation for this lecture, and P. Rosanvallon, Le Capitalisme utopique, p. 144. Although Thomas Paine (1737–1809) was in fact of British origin, we should make it clear that Common Sense was published fourteen months after his settlement in America and that the book, written at the request of Benjamin Franklin, expressed the aspirations of the American people at the beginning of the War of Independence.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Michel Senellart François Ewald (General Editor)Alessandro Fontana (General Editor)

Copyright information

© 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Senellart, M., Ewald, F., Fontana, A. (2008). 10 January 1979. In: Senellart, M., Ewald, F., Fontana, A. (eds) The Birth of Biopolitics. Michel Foucault. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594180_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics