Skip to main content

Challenges for Public Investment in New EU Member States

  • Chapter
Public Investment and Public-Private Partnerships

Part of the book series: Procyclicality of Financial Systems in Asia ((IMF))

  • 233 Accesses

Abstract

The first section of this chapter briefly summarizes the main theoretical arguments for public sector involvement in investment activities. The second section presents some stylized facts about the need to upgrade infrastructure in the new member states. The size and composition of investment in the new and old European Union (EU) member states in recent years are compared and assessed against what could be expected on theoretical grounds. The third section explains the position of public investment in the EU budgetary framework and dwells on the arguments for and against complementing the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) with a “golden rule.” The question of to what extent accession affected public investment in practice is also addressed. The fourth section analyzes public investment in the new member states in relation to private investment and EU transfers. Finally, the main conclusions of the chapter are summarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aschauer, D. A., 1989, “Is Public Expenditure Productive?” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 23, pp. 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayindir-Upmann, T., 1998, “Two Games of Interjurisdictional Competition When Local Governments Provide Industrial Public Goods,” International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 5, pp. 471–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, J., and W. Romp, 2005, “Public Capital and Economic Growth: A Critical Survey,” EIB Papers, Vol. 10 (1), pp. 41–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetriades, P. 0., and T. P. Mamuneas, 2000, “Intertemporal Output and Employment Effects of Public Infrastructure Capital: Evidence from 12 OECD Economies,” Economic Journal, Vol. 110, pp. 687–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, 2003a, Final Financial Arrangement Decided in Copenhagen on 13 December 2002 for the Accession States (Brussels). Available via the Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/budget/library/documents/multiannual_framework/2000_2006/webtables_en.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, 2003b, “European Commission on Track to Ensuring an Enlarged Europe is a Greener Europe,” IP/03/81 (Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, 2003c, “Public Finances in EMU-2003,” European Economy, No. 3 (Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, 2005, “Public Finances in EMU-2005,” European Economy, No. 3 (Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuest, C., 1995, “Interjurisdictional Competition and Public Expenditure: Is Tax Co- ordination Counterproductive?” Finanzarchiv NF, Vol. 52, pp. 478–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, J., and R. Perotti, 2003, “Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe,” Economic Policy, No. 37 (October), pp. 533–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallett M., and F. Keeremar, 2005, “Budgetary Transfers Between the EU and the New Member States: Manna ‘rem Brussels or a Fiscal Drag?” ECFIN Country Focus Vol. 2, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perée, R., 2007, “Public Investment in Europe: Evolution and Determinants,” presentation at the IMF conference “Strengthening Public Investment and Managing Fiscal Risks from Public-Private Partnerships,” Budapest, Hungary, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, C., and R. Sierhej, 2007, “Interpreting EU Funds Data for Macroeconomic Analysis in the New Member States,” IMF Working Paper 07/77 ( Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon B., and H. R. Vane, 2005, Modern Macroeconomics Its Origins, Development and Current State ( Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turrini, A., 2004, “Public Investment and the EU Fiscal Framework,” European Commission Economic Papers No. 202 ( Brussels: European Commission ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Miert, K., 2003, Report of the High-Level Group on the Trans-European Transport Network ( Brussels: European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, 2002, Meeting the EU Environmental Acquis—Cost Estimates for Accession Candidates (Washington).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 International Monetary Fund

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jevčák, A., Keereman, F. (2008). Challenges for Public Investment in New EU Member States. In: Schwartz, G., Corbacho, A., Funke, K. (eds) Public Investment and Public-Private Partnerships. Procyclicality of Financial Systems in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593992_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics