Abstract
Public administration research and teaching over the past couple of decades have become increasingly focused on theorizing and explaining institutional change in civil service systems. It could perhaps be argued that organizational change always has been an important feature of the discipline, with literatures such as organizational development focusing on endogenous sources of change in public organizations. The changes brought about by cutback policies, new public management (NPM) and the development towards governance, however, pose major new exogenous challenges to the Western civil service systems. This focus on change, both within the civil service and also in its relationship with actors in its environment, has entailed problems of different kinds. One type of problem stems from many public administration theories’ relative lack of interest in change. Much of the organizational theory on public organizations, for instance, was mainly concerned with organizational structure as such and had little reason to conceptualize major changes in public organizations. Similarly, early schools of human resource management departed to a large extent from the assumption that public and private careers tracks were not communicating vessels, hence there was little need to look at public employment strategies in a competitive perspective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agranoff, R. and M. McGuire, ‘Multinetwork Management: Collaboration and the Hollow State in Local Economic Policy’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8 (1998), 67–91.
Allison, G.T., The Essence of Decision (Boston: Little, Brown, 1972).
Bache, I. and M. Flinders (eds), Multi-level Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).
Barberis, P., ‘The New Public Management and a New Accountability’, Public Administration, 76 (1998), 451–70.
Bekke, Hans A.G.M., James L. Perry and Theo A.J. Toonen, Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1996).
Brunsson, N., The Organization of Hypocrisy (New York: Wiley, 1989).
Brunsson, N. and J.P. Olsen, The Reforming Organization (London: Routledge, 1993).
Burns, J. and B. Bowornwathana, Civil Service Systems in Asia (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001).
Chapman, R.A., Ethics in Public Service for the New Millennium (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000).
Coombes, D. and T. Verheijen, Innovations in Public Management — Perspectives from East and West (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998).
Derlien, H.-U., On the Selective Interpretation of Max Weber’s Concept of Bureaucracy in Organization Theory and Administrative Science. In P. Ahonen and K. Palonen (eds), Dis-Embalming Max Weber (Jyväskylä, Finland: SoPhi, 1999).
Du Gay, P., In Praise of Bureaucracy (London: Sage, 2000).
Hood, C., ‘De-Sir Humphreying the Westminster Model of Bureaucracy’, Governance, 3 (1990), 205–14.
Hood, C., Relations between Minister/Politicians and Civil Servants: Public Service Bargains Old and New. In B.G. Peters and D.J. Savoie (eds), Governance in the Twenty-first Century (Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2001), pp. 178–208.
Kettl, D., The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-first Century America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002).
Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler, Reinventing Government (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992).
Page, E.C. and B. Jenkins, Policy Bureaucracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
Peters, B.G., ‘Governance and Public Bureaucracy: New Forms of Democracy or New Forms of Control’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 26 (2003), 3–16.
Peters, B.G. and J. Pierre, Multi-level Governance and Democracy: A Faustian Bargain? In I. Bache and M. Flinders (eds), Multi-level Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 79–92.
Pierre, J. and B.G. Peters, Governing Complex Societies (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
Pierre, J. and G. Stoker, Towards Multi-Level Governance. In P. Dunleavy, A. Gamble, I. Holliday and G. Peele (eds), Developments in British Politics (London: Macmillan, 2000), pp. 29–46.
Rhodes, R.A.W., ‘The New Governance: Governing Without Governance’, Political Studies, 44 (1996), 652–67.
Salamon, L.M., Introduction: New Governance, New Instruments. In L.M. Salamon (ed.), Handbook of Policy Instruments (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Smith, A., ‘Studying Multi-Level Governance: Examples from French Translations of the Structural Funds’, Public Administration, 20 (1997), 711–29.
Soreuson, E. and J. Torfing, ‘Network Politics, Political Capital and Democracy’, International Journal of Public Administration, 26, 609–34.
Suleiman, E., Dismantling Democratic States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003).
Walsh, K. and J. Stewart, ‘Change in the Management of Public Services’, Public Administration, 70 (1992), 490–518.
Wright, V., Blurring the Public-Private Divide. In B.G. Peters and D.J. Savoie (eds), Governance in the Twenty-First Century (Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2000), pp. 155–77.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peters, B.G., Pierre, J. (2007). Governance and Civil Service Systems: From Easy Answers to Hard Questions. In: Raadschelders, J.C.N., Toonen, T.A.J., Van der Meer, F.M. (eds) The Civil Service in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593084_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593084_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54620-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59308-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)