Abstract
The concept of judicialization circumscribes a multiplicity of meanings. In this chapter, we focus on one of the ‘newest’ meanings of judicialization, what Tate and Vallinder (1995b: 516) refer to as ‘Judicialization I’: judges and judicial institutions as policy makers complementing, substituting, or competing with politically accountable policy actors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alter, K.J., ‘The European Court’s Political Power’, West European Politics, 19 (1996), 458–87.
Canon, Bradley C. and Charles A. Johnson, Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1999).
Cappelletti, Mauro, Paul J. Kollmer and Joanne M. Olson, The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).
Christensen, Robert K., ‘Getting to Peace by Reconciling Notions of Justice: The Importance of Considering Discrepancies between Civil and Common Legal Systems in the Formation of the International Criminal Court’, UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, 6 (2001/02), 391–422.
Christie, George C., ‘Some Key Jurisprudential Issues of the Twenty-First Century’, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 8 (2000), 217.
Conant, Lisa J., Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002).
DiNome, John A., Saundra Yaklin and D.H. Rosenbloom, Employee Rights: Avoiding Legal Liability. In S.F. Freyss (ed.), Human Resource Management in Local Government: An Essential Guide (Washington, DC: International City/Council Management Association, 1999), pp. 92–131.
Eisenberg, Melvin Aron, The Nature of the Common Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988).
Epstein, Lee, The Comparative Advantage. APSA Chair’s Column. Law and Courts Section Newsletter (American Political Science Association, 1999), Available at: <http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~polisci/epstein/research/compadv.pdf>.
Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight and Olga Shvetsova, ‘The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government’, In Law & Society Review (2001).
Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira and Vanessa A. Baird, ‘On the Legitimacy of National High Courts’, American Political Science Review, 92 (1998), 343–58.
Guarnieri, Carlo, Patrizia Pederzoli and C.A. Thomas, The Power of fudges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy, Oxford Socio-Legal Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Hamilton, D.K., ‘The Continuing Judicial Assault on Patronage’, Public Administration Review, 59 (1999), 54–62.
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Stefaan Van der Jeught, ‘Human Rights Protection Under the New Constitutions of Eastern Europe’, Loyola LA International and Comparative Law Journal, 20 (1998), 475–506.
Horowitz, Donald L., The Courts and Social Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1977).
Hurst, James Willard, Law and Social Order in the United States (Ithaca, NJ: Cornell University Press, 1977).
Jackson, Donald Dale, Judges (New York: Atheneum, 1974).
Jackson, Vicki C. and Mark V. Tushnet, Defining the Field of Comparative Constitutional Law (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002).
Jacob, Herbert, Erhard Blankenburg, Herbert M. Kritzer, Doris Marie Provine and Joseph Sanders (eds), Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996).
Kagan, Robert A., ‘Should Europe Worry about Adversarial Legalism?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 17 (1997), 165–83.
Kagan, Robert A., Adversarial Legalism: The American way of Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).
Koopmans, Thijmen, Courts and Political Institutions: A Comparative View (Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Kramer, L., ‘Achieving equitable education through the courts: A comparative analysis of three states’, Journal of Law & Education, 31 (2002), 1–51.
Kritzer, Herbert M., Courts, Justice, and Politics in England. In H. Jacob et al. (eds), Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996).
Melnick, R. Shep, Between the Lines: Interpreting Welfare Rights (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1994).
Murphy, Walter F., C. Herman Pritchett and Lee Epstein, Courts, Judges & Politics: An Introduction to the Judicial Process (Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2002).
O’Leary, Rosemary, Environmental Change: Federal Courts and the EPA (Temple University Press, 1993).
O’Leary, Rosemary and Charles R. Wise, ‘Public Managers, Judges, and Legislators: Redefining the “new partnership”’, Public Administration Review, 51 (1991), 316–27.
Provine, Doris Marie, Courts in the Political Process in France. In H. Jacob et al. (eds), Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996).
Raadschelders, J.C.N., Government: A Public Administration Perspective (Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 2003).
Reitz, John C., ‘American Law in a Time of Global Interdependence: U.S. National Reports to the XVIth International Congress of Comparative Law: Section IV: Standing to Raise Constitutional Issues’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 50 (2002), 437–61.
Rohr, John A., Founding Republics in France and America: A study in constitutional governance, Studies in Government and Public Policy (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995).
Rosenbloom, D.H., ‘Retrofitting the Administrative State to the Constitution: Congress and the judiciary’s twentieth-century progress’, Public Administration Review, 60 (2000), 39–46.
Rosenbloom, David H., Public Administration and Law: bench v. bureau in the United States, Public Administration and Public Policy, 14 (New York: Dekker, 1983).
Rosenbloom, David H. and Rosemary O’Leary, Public Administration and Law, Public Administration and Public Policy, 61 (New York: Dekker, 1997).
Ruggiero, Cristina M., The European Court of Justice and the German Constitutional Court: Is there more than one legal ‘master’ of European Integration? The Case of the EU Banana Regulations. In A. Sarat and P. Ewick (eds), Studies in Law, Politics and Society (New York: JAI, 2002).
Shapiro, Martin M., Who guards the guardians?: judicial control of administration, The Richard B. Russell lectures No. 6 (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1988).
Shapiro, Martin M., The United States. In C.N. Tate and T. Vallinder (eds), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New York: New York University Press, 1995)
Shapiro, Martin M. and Alec Stone, ‘The New Constitutional Politics of Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 26 (1994), 397–419.
Shapiro, Martin M. and Alec Stone Sweet, On Law, Politics, and Judicialization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Sterett, Susan, ‘Judicial Review in Britain’, Comparative Political Studies, 26 (1994), 421–42.
Stone, Alec, ‘Judging Socialist Reform: The Politics of Coordinate Construction in France and Germany’, Comparative Political Studies, 26 (1994), 443–69.
Stone Sweet, Alec, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
Stone Sweet, Alec and Thomas L. Brunell, ‘The European Courts and the National Courts: A Statistical Analysis of Preliminary References: 1961–1995’, Journal of European Public Policy, 5 (1998), 66–97.
Tate, C. Neal and Torbjèorn Vallinder, The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New York: New York University Press, 1995a).
Tate, C. Neal and Torbjèorn Vallinder, Judicialization and the future of politics and policy. In C.N. Tate and T. Vallinder (eds), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New York: New York University Press, 1995b), pp. 517–28.
van Horn, Carl E., Donald C. Baumer and William T. Gormley, Politics and Public Policy (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2001).
Von Mehren, Arthur T., The US Legal System: Between the Common Law and Civil Law Legal Traditions (Centre for Comparative and Foreign Law Studies, 2000), cited 9 July 2004. Available at: <http://w3.uniromal.it/idc/centro/publica-tions/main.htm>.
Weiler, J.H.H., ‘A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice an Its Interlocutors’, Comparative Political Studies, 26 (1994), 510–35.
Wise, Charles and Trevor Brown, When Governments Disagree: A Comparative Analysis of Conflict Resolution Mechanisms in Intergovernmental Relations in Three Nations. In N. I. f. R. A. (NIRA) and N. A. o. P. A. (NAPA) (eds), The challenge to new governance in the twenty-first century: achieving effective central-local relations (Tokyo: National Institute for Research Advancement (NIRA), 1999).
Wise, Charles and Robert K. Christensen, ‘A Full and Fair Capacity: Federal Courts Managing State Programs’, Administration & Society, 37 (2005), 576–610.
Wise, Charles, Brian Clemow, Saranne Murray, Scott Boston and Lisa Bingham, When Things Go Wrong. In S.F. Freyss (ed.), Human Resource Management in Local Government: An Essential Guide (Washington, DC: International City/Council Management Association, 1999), pp. 181–201.
Wise, Charles R. and Rosemary O’Leary, ‘Breaking up Is Hard to Do: The Dissolution of Judicial Supervision of Public Services’, Public Administration Review, 63 (2003), 177.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Robert K. Christensen and Charles R. Wise
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Christensen, R.K., Wise, C.R. (2007). Law and Management: Comparatively Assessing the Reach of Judicialization. In: Raadschelders, J.C.N., Toonen, T.A.J., Van der Meer, F.M. (eds) The Civil Service in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593084_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593084_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54620-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59308-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)