Abstract
The following examples show that accentuation can change the conditions under which a sentence can be used:
-
(1)
a. Who did John introduce to Sue? — John introduced BILL to Sue.
-
b.
To whom did John introduce Bill? — John introduced Bill to SUE.
The declarative sentences in the examples (1-a) and (1-b) can be used felicitously as answers to the questions preceding them. The senctence with stress on “Bill” (example (1-a)), however, is not a felicitous answer to the question of example (1-b), nor can the sentence with stress on “Sue” (example (1-b)) be used as a reply to the question of example (1-a). Due to the different stress patterns both sentences require different utterance contexts; they have different use conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Hans-Christian Schmitz
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmitz, HC. (2008). Introduction: Pragmatic and Semantic Effects of Accentuation. In: Accentuation and Interpretation. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592568_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592568_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28073-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59256-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)