Abstract
This chapter focuses on protests surrounding weighing and measuring in nineteenth-century Egypt. Such protests continued throughout the century and came mainly in the form of petitions to the authorities from merchants, retailers and buyers, as well as weighers and measurers themselves. My initial objective was to ask whether these protests represented a genuine form of resistance to forms of exploitation, or were they simply part and parcel of the hegemonic reproduction of Egypt’s ruling order. But it was impossible to overcome the difficulties attendant on defining genuine resistance. Authentic counterhegemony remains seemingly in the eye of the beholder, and depends on an observer’s prior commitment to a set of values or a historical metanarrative which can allow the specification of truly liberatory practice. The goal of this chapter therefore became how to continue to use the valuable concepts of hegemony and counterhegemony, which have allowed historians and others to understand the operations of power in far more sophisticated ways than models which speak simply of either oppression or legitimate authority, in default of some quasi-divine insight into human nature and social meaning. On this basis, the petitions and protests I studied became an illustration of a form of successful hegemonic articulation or hegemonic deepening, involving the identification — in a particular sense — of diverse social interests at specific linguistic and practical sites.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This formulation uses ‘social power’ in the sense meant by Michael Mann, The Sources of Social Power: A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760, Vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).
This reading of ‘suture’ is greatly indebted to Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (London: Verso, 1985), passim.
André Raymond, Artisans et commerçants au Caire au XVIIIe siècle, 2 Vols, (Damas: Institut Français d’Etudes Arabes, 1973 ), p. 275.
Pascale Ghazaleh, Masters of the Trade: Crafts and Craftspeople in Cairo, 1750–1850, Cairo Papers in Social Science, Vol. 22, No. 3 (Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 1999 ), p. 94.
Gabriel Baer, ‘Popular Revolt in Ottoman Cairo’, in Der Islam, 54 (1977), pp. 213–42, esp. 213.
André Raymond, ‘Quartiers et mouvements populaires au Caire au XVIIIième Siècle’ in Political and Social Change in Modern Egypt, edited by P.M. Holt (London: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 104–16, esp. 112–13.
Text of the Qanun al-Muntakhabat (issued in Sha‘ban 1245/Jan/Feb 1830) in Filib Jallad, Qamus al-Idara wa-l-Qada’ Vol. 3 (Alexandria: n.p., 1891), p. 1327. ‘Throughout his [Mehmet Alis] many trips round the countryside,’ Marsot writes, ‘any fallah with as petition was allowed to present it.’
Afaf Lutfi al-Sayyid Marsot, Egypt in the Reign of Muhammad Ali (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 109–10. Marsot speaks of many petitions and complaints, the usual targets being local ‘umad and shaykh-s al-balad (p. 113).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 John Chalcraft
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chalcraft, J. (2007). Counterhegemonic Effects: Weighing, Measuring, Petitions and Bureaucracy in Nineteenth-century Egypt. In: Chalcraft, J., Noorani, Y. (eds) Counterhegemony in the Colony and Postcolony. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592162_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592162_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28547-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59216-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)