Abstract
The subject of my chapter is the subject or its derivates, the actor, the author, the individual. But my aim is not to explain what a subject or its derivates are or can be or should be. The claim I assert is rather modest. I will not deal with real subjects — if any real subject has ever existed. I want only to meditate on how subjects can be addressed and why subjectivity as a form has emerged as an accountable point of attribution. I want only to make some theoretical remarks about how sociology deals with the problem of subjectivity. As a warning, I have to confess that I shall take readers on a necessary detour through the discipline’s classical approach to theorizing subjectivity, with a focus on the problem of willing and doing and the deconstruction of those traditional concepts. The basso continuo of this chapter is a criticism of the peculiar tendency of sociology concerning the functional meaning of attribution practices to individuals. How selves can emerge as ‘willing selves’ is the fundamental question of this volume and the fundamental question of the bourgeois tradition. The basic question of this bourgeois world was: ‘How can we will what we have to do?’ The contemporary question in our neuroscientifical world is probably: ‘How can we will what our brain is going to do with us?’ Thus far — my cryptic suggestions about what I want to present here.
I want to thank Sabine Maasen, Barbara Sutter, and Daniel Lee for really helpful comments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adorno, Th. W., Aspects of Sociology, trans. John Viertel (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1972).
Foucault, M., The Birth of the Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception, trans. A. M. Sheridan-Smith (London: Tavistock, 1973).
Foucault, M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. A. M. Sheridan-Smith, (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977).
Haggard, P. and M. Eimer, ‘On the Relation Between Brain Potentials and the Awareness of Voluntary Movements’, Experimental Brain Research, CXXVI (1999): 128–33.
Hegel, G. W. F., The Philosophy of Right (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967).
Hegel, G. W. F., The Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979).
Husserl, E., On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time, 1893–1917 (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1991).
Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Werner S. Pluhar and Patricia Kitcher (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996).
Libet, B., Mind Time: The Temporal Factor in Consciousness (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).
Luhmann, N., ‘The Autopoiesis of Social Systems’, in R. F. Geyer and J. van der Zouwen (eds), Sociocybernetic Paradoxes: Observation, Control and Evolution of Self-Steering Systems (London: Sage, 1986), pp. 172–92.
Luhmann, N., Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik. Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft, vol. 3 (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1989).
Luhmann, N., Essays on Self-reference (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990).
Luhmann, N., Social Systems (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995).
Luhmann, N., Observations on Modernity (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998).
Lupton, D., The Imperative of Health: Public Health and the regulated Body (London: Sage, 1995).
Mills, C. W., ‘Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive’, American Sociological Review, V (1940): 904–13.
Nassehi, A., Differenzierungsfolgen. Beiträge zur Soziologie der Moderne (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1999).
Nassehi, A., Geschlossenheit und Offenheit. Studien zur Theorie der modernen Gesellschaft (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2003).
Nassehi, A., Der soziologische Diskurs der Moderne (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2006).
Covalevski, M. A., M. W. Dirsmith, J. B. Heian and S. Samuel, ‘The Calculated and the Avowed: Techniques of Discipline and Struggles over Identity in Six Big Accounting Firms’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 2 (1998): 292–327.
Horkheimer, M. and T. W. Adorno, Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente (Frankfurt/M.: Fischer, 1944/1994).
Foucault, M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Pantheon, 1975/1977).
Foucault, M., Der Mensch ist ein Erfahrungstier. Gespräch mit Ducio Trombadori (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1978/1996).
Weber, M., ‘Wissenschaft als Beruf’, in M. Weber, Gesamtausgabe, vol. 17 (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1919/1973), pp. 71–111.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Armin Nassehi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nassehi, A. (2007). The Person as an Effect of Communication. In: Maasen, S., Sutter, B. (eds) On Willing Selves. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592087_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592087_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28472-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59208-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)