Abstract
Most recently, the neurosciences have become fashionable in society. They stimulate all kinds of initiatives: neuro-didactics, neuro-theology, neuro-economy, and neuro-technology inspire educational, spiritual, industrial, or ‘neuro-ceutical’ approaches to governing selves and society alike. Call it hype or horror: the recent fad, provocatively stated, is ultimately about brainy selves happily living in neuro-society explained by the neurosciences and largely regulated by neuro-technologies. In truth, while this abbreviated storyline is, as yet, only part of the daydreams of single entrepreneurs in the domain of consulting (see Lynch, 2004), it has already affected general media discourse. Various applications of the neurosciences have attracted journalists’ interest. More often than not, the findings have been glossed over in a more humoristic note. Neuro-marketing, for instance, is being mocked as revealing insights that are not really new with the help of costly experimentation and instrumentation. Above all, neuro-marketing seems to have found out that favorite brands are favored by our brains, too (Schnabel, 2003).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bieri, P., ‘Untergräbt die Regie des Gehirns die Freiheit des Willens?’, Manuscript (2005).
Bröckling, U., S. Krasmann and T. Lemke, Gouvernementalitiit der Gegenwart. Studien zur Ökonomisierung des Sozialen (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2000).
Crick, F. and C. Koch, ‘Consciousness and Neuroscience’, Cerebral Cortex, 8, 2 (1998): 97–107.
Darwall, S., ‘The Value of Autonomy and Autonomy of the Will’, Ethics, 116 (2006): 263–284.
Dean, M., Critical and Effective Histories: Foucault’s Methods and Historical Sociology (London and New York: Routledge, 1994).
Dean, M., ‘A Social Structure of Many Souls?: Moral Regulation, Self-Formation and Government’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 19 (1995): 145–68.
Deleuze, G., ‘Society of Control’ (1990). Accessed 17 July 2006 at: http://www.nadir.org/nadir/archiv/netzkritik/societyofcontrol.html
Fitzsimons, P., Radical Pedagogy, Neoliberalism and Education: The Autonomous Chooser (2002). Accessed 5 January 2007 at: http://radicalpedagogy.icaap.org/content/issue4_2/04_fitzsimons. html
Foucault, M., ‘The Political Technologies of Individuals’, in L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, and P. H. Hutton (eds), Technologies of the Self (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1988), pp. 145–62.
Foucault, M., ‘Questions of Method’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), pp. 73–86.
Fowler, G. L., ‘The Human Genome Project–what’s the public got to do with it?’, Public Understanding of Science, 8, 3 (1999): 153.
Gordon, C., ‘Governmental Rationality: An Introduction’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), pp. 1–51.
Hilgartner, S., Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000).
Keat, R. and N. Abercrombie (eds), Enterprise Culture: The International Library of Sociology (London: Routledge, 1991), pp. 1–23.
Lessenich, S., ‘Soziale Subjektivität. Die neue Regierung der Gesellschaft’, Mittelweg 36, 4 (2003): 80–93.
Lochrie, K., ‘Desiring Foucault’, The Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 27, 1 (1997): 3–16.
Maasen, S. ‘Neurosociety Ahead? Debating Free Will in the Media’, in S. Pocket, W. P. Baks and S. Gallagher (eds), Does Consciousness Cause Behavior? (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006a), p. 339–59.
Maasen, S., ‘Gibt es den freien Willen? Eine Debatte im Feuilleton’, kultuRRevolution, 50 (2006b): 44–59.
Meeting of Minds: European Citizen Jury on Brain Research, Deutsches Hygiene-Museum, Dresden (25–27 November 2005).
Miller, S., ‘Public understanding of science at the crossroads,’ Public Understanding of Science, 10 (2001): 115–20.
Milner, A. D., ‘Cerebral correlates of visual awareness’, Neuropsychologia, 33 (1995): 1117–30.
Novas, C. and N. Rose, ‘Genetic Risk and the Birth of the Somatic Individual’, Economy and Society, 29, 4 (2000): 485–513.
Rimke, H. M., ‘Governing citizens through self-help literature’, Cultural Studies, 14, 1 (2000): 61–78.
Roth, G., Fühlen, Denken, Handeln. Wie das Gehirn unser Verhalten steuert (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2003).
Rose, N., ‘Becoming Neurochemical Selves’, in N. Stehr (ed), Biotechnology, Commerce And Civil Society (Transaction Press, 2004), retrieved 2 February 2006 from: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/sociology/pdf/Rose-BecomingNeurochemicalSelves.pdf
Schnabel, U., ‘Der Markt der Neuronen. Hirnforscher werden zu Werbefachleuten. Sie wollen enthüllen, was den Käufer zum Konsum treibt’, Die Zeit, 41 (2003): 47.
Singer, W., Der Beobachter im Hirn. Essays zur Hirnforschung (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2002).
Zeman, A., ‘Consciousness’, Brain, 24 (2001): 1263–89.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Sabine Maasen and Barbara Sutter
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maasen, S., Sutter, B. (2007). Introduction: Reviving a Sociology of Willing Selves. In: Maasen, S., Sutter, B. (eds) On Willing Selves. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592087_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592087_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28472-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59208-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)