The Quest for a European Public Sphere: News Media and Democratic Legitimacy

Part of the Transformations of the State book series (TRST)


Democratic legitimacy of political orders and political decisions depends on the consent of the governed. This almost common-sensical proposition suggests that

legitimacy requires that people have beliefs about a political order that motivate them to support that order in some way, to accept obligations towards it and to act mainly according to its rules. These beliefs and attitudes should also correspond to public opinion and be articulated in public discourse.1


European Union Public Sphere Public Discourse Democratic Legitimacy Horizontal Integration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. Peters, ‘Public Discourse, Identity and the Problem of Democratic Legitimacy’, in E. O. Eriksen (ed.), Making the European Polity. Reflexive Integration in the EU (London: Routledge, 2005), p. 98.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Ferree, W. Gamson, J. Gerhards and D. Rucht, Shaping Abortion Discourse. Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Wessler, Öffentlichkeit als Prozess [The Public Sphere in Procedural Perspective] (Opladen, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Hallin and P. Mancini, Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peters, ‘Public Discourse’; B. Peters, S. Sifft, A. Wimmel, M. Brüggemann and K. Kleinen-von Königslöw, ‘National and Transnational Public Spheres: the Case of the EU’, in S. Leibfried and M. Zürn (eds), Transformations of the State? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005), pp. 139–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Peters and H. Wessler, ‘Transnationale Öffentlichkeiten — analytische Dimensionen, normative Standards, sozialkulturelle Produktionsstrukturen [Transnational Public Spheres — Analytical Dimensions, Normative Standards, Socio-cultural Production Structures]’, in K. Imhof, R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli and O. Jarren (eds), Demokratie in der Mediengesellschaft [Democracy in a Mediadominated Society] (Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006, forthcoming).Google Scholar
  7. R. Koopmans and J. Erbe, ‘Towards a European Public Sphere? Vertical and Horizontal Dimensions of Europeanized Political Communication’, Innovation, 17(2) (2004) pp. 97–118.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Gerhards, ‘Missing a European Public Sphere’, in M. Kohli and M. Novak (eds). Will Europe Work? Integration, Employment and the Social Order (London/New York: Routledge, 2001), pp. 145–58.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    For a similar argument, see F. Neidhardt, ‘Europäische Öffentlichkeit als Prozess. Anmerkungen zum Forschungsstand [A European Public Sphere in the Making. The Current State of Research]’, in W.R. Langenbucher and M. Latzer (eds). Europäische Öffentlichkeit und medialer Wandel: eine transdiszi-plinäre Perspektive [A European Public Sphere and the Evolution of Mass Media: Transdisciplinary Perspectives] (Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006), pp. 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Moravcsik, ‘In Defence of the “Democratic Deficit”’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4) (2002) pp. 603–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Majone, ‘Europe’s “Democratic Deficit”: the Question of Standards’, European Law Journal, 4(1) (1998) pp. 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 15.
    See K. Eder and C. Kantner, ‘Transnationale Resonanzstrukturen in Europa. Eine Kritik der Rede vom Öffentlichkeitsdefizit [Transnational Resonance Structures in Europe. Criticizing the Thesis of the Public Sphere Deficit]’, in M. Bach (ed.). Die Europäisierung nationaler Gesellschaften [The Europeanization of National Societies] (Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 2000), p. 315.Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    J. Habermas, ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution? Response to Dieter Grimm’, in J. Habermas, The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998), p. 160.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    T. Risse, ‘Zur Debatte um die (Nicht-)Existenz einer europäischen Öffentlichkeit. Was wir wissen, und wie es zu interpretieren ist [The Debate about the (Non-) Existence of a European Public Sphere: What We Know and How to Interpret It]’, Berliner Debatte Initial, 13(5) (2002) pp. 15–23Google Scholar
  15. S. Tobler, ‘Konfliktinduzierte Transnationalisierung nationaler und supranationaler Öffentlichkeitsarenen [The Conflict-induced Transnationalization of National and Supranational Public Arenas]’, in W. R. Langenbucher and M. Latzer (eds), Europäische Öffentlichkeit und medialer Wandel: eine transdisziplinäre Perspektive [A European Public Sphere and the Evolution of Mass Media: Transdisciplinary Perspectives] (Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006), pp. 107–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 18.
    H.-J. Trenz, ‘Korruption und politischer Skandal in der EU: Auf dem Weg zu einer politischen Öffentlichkeit? [Corruption and Political Scandal in the EU: On the Way to a Political Public Sphere?]’, in M. Bach (ed.), Die Europäisierung nationaler Gesellschaften [The Europeanization of National Societies] (Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 2000), pp. 332–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. M. van de Steeg, ‘The Public Sphere in the European Union: A Media Analysis of Public Discourse on EU Enlargement and on the Haider Case’, doctoral thesis (Florence: European University Institute, 2005).Google Scholar
  18. 21.
    See A. Wimmel, ‘Transnationale Diskurse in der europäischen Medienöffentlichkeit [Transnational Discourses in Europe’s Mediated Public Sphere]’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 46(3) (2005) pp. 459–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 24.
    See, for example, P.G. Kielmannsegg, ‘Integration und Demokratie (mit Nachwort zur 2. Auflage) [Integration and Democracy (Including an Epilogue for the 2nd Edition)]’, in M. Jachtenfuchs and B. Kohler-Koch (eds), Europäische Integration [European Integration], 2nd edn (Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 2003), pp. 49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 28.
    All results will be published in B. Peters, H. Wessler, S. Sifft, M. Brüggemann and K. Kleinen-von Königslöw, The Transnationalization of Public Spheres (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, forthcoming).Google Scholar
  21. 29.
    M. Zürn, ‘Democratic Governance beyond the Nation-State: the EU and Other International Institutions’, European Journal of International Relations, 6(2) (2000) p. 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 30.
    See D. Held, A. McGrew, D. Goldblatt and J. Perraton, Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
  23. M. Beisheim, S. Dreher, G. Walter, B. Zangl and M. Zürn, Im Zeitalter der Globalisierung? Thesen und Daten zur gesellschaftlichen und politischen Denationalisierung [In the Age of Globalization? Theses and Data on Societal and Political Denationalization] (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1999)Google Scholar
  24. O. Boyd-Barrett and T. Rantanen (eds). The Globalisation of News (London: Sage, 1998).Google Scholar
  25. 31.
    For each year we sampled all newspaper articles of two randomly selected Mondays, two Tuesdays, and so on. For an account of the effectiveness of this constructed week method, see D. A. Riffe, C. F. Lacy and R. Stephen, Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research (Mahwah: L. Erlbaum, 1998).Google Scholar
  26. 33.
    C. Eilders and K. Voltmer, ‘Zwischen Deutschland und Europa: eine empirische Untersuchung zum Grad von Europäisierung und Europā Unterstützung der meinungsführenden deutschen Tageszeitungen [Between Germany and Europe: an Empirical Investigation of the Degree of Europeanization and Support for Europe in the Leading German Press]’, Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 51(2) (2003) pp. 250–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 34.
    H. Sievert, Europäischer Journalismus: Theorie und Empirie aktueller Medienkommunikation in der Europäischen Union [European Journalism: Theory and Findings about Mediated Communication in the European Union] (Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 38.
    See, for example, Kielmansegg, ‘Integration und Demokratie’; D. Grimm, ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution?’ European Law Journal, 1(3) (1995) pp. 282–302.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hartmut Wessler, Michael Brüggemann, Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw, Stefanie Sifft and Andreas Wimmel 2007

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations