Abstract
The increasing emphasis on the citizen-consumer in the reform of public services in Britain and beyond is open to different interpretations. Within governance theory it might be understood as yet another phase of the continued blurring of distinctions between state and market, government and society. Alternatively it might be viewed as marking new forms of collaboration between service organizations and ‘empowered’ service users. Yet such interpretations tell us little about why the consumer stands as such an iconic figure in programmes of modernization; how consumerism may open up new forms of claims making on the part of social actors, nor how it sometimes forms a focal point around which resistance to the perceived demise of the social democratic welfare state is voiced. The importance of these ‘struggles for meaning’ in shaping social practice and informing patterns of institutional change is the focus of this chapter. It proceeds as follows. I begin by reviewing some of the difficulties of conceptualizing ‘the social’ in governance theory; then go on (section 2) to highlight the contribution of ethnography, discourse analysis and cultural perspectives in research on governance as a changing ‘order of rule’, and the new patterns of relationship and identification that may result. Section 3 sets out a framework of analysis, and briefly illustrates ways in which such a framework might be used to enrich understandings of the place of the citizen-consumer in changing forms and strategies of governance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See for example J. Allen, Lost Geographies of Power(Oxford, 2003);
N. Rose, Powers of Freedom: Reframing Social and Political Thought(Cambridge, 1999);
W. Walters, ‘Social Capital and Political Sociology: Re-imagining Politics?’, Sociology, 36(2) (2002), pp. 377–97;
W. Walters, ‘Some Critical Notes on “Governance”’, Studies in Political Economy, 73 (spring/summer) (2004), pp. 27–46.
See also J. Brodie, ‘The Great Undoing: Gender Politics and Social Policy in Canada’, in C. Kingfisher (ed.) Western Welfare in Decline: Globalization and Women’s Poverty(Philadelphia, 2002), pp. 90–110;
J. Newman, ‘Re-gendering Governance’, in J. Newman (ed.) Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere(Bristol, 2005).
L. Chouliaraki, ‘Discourse Analysis’, in T. Bennett and F. J. Cedo, The Sage Handbook of Cultural Analysis(London, 2007).
F. Fischer, Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices(Oxford, 2003).
A. Petersen, I. Dudley and P. Harris, Poststructuralism, Citizenship and Social Policy(New York, 1999), p. 8.
R. B. Hall and T. Bierstalker, The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance(Cambridge, 2002).
M. Bevir and R. Rhodes, Interpreting British Governance(London, 2003), p. 32.
G. Marston, Social Policy and Discourse Analysis; Policy Change in Public Housing(Aldershot, 2004).
C. Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures(New York, 1973).
C. Barnett, ‘The Consolations of ‘Neo-liberalism’, Geoforum, 36 (2005), pp. 7–12: quotation p. 11.
J. Potter and M. Wetherell, ‘Unfolding Discourse Analysis’, in M. Wetherell, S. Taylor and S. J. Yates (eds) Discourse Theory and Practice(London, 2001), p. 199. Also see Bevir’s account of constructivism in the preceding chapter in this volume.
D. Steinberg and R. Johnson (eds) Blairism and the War of Persuasion: Labour’s Passive Revolution(London, 2004).
Office of Public Service Reform, Reforming our Services: Principles into Practice(London, 2002), p. 8.
J. Clarke, J. Newman, N. Smith, E. Vidier and L. Westmarland, Creating Citizen Consumers: Changing Publics and Changing Public Services(London, 2007); J. Clarke, ‘Consumers, Clients and Citizens: Politics, Policy and Practice in the Reform of Social Care’, European Societies8(3), pp. 423–42;
J. Newman and E. Vidier, ‘Discriminating Customers, Responsible Patients, Empowered Users: Political and Professional Discourse in the Modernization of Health Care’, Journal of Social Policy, 35(2) (2006), pp. 193–209;
J. Newman and E. Vidier, ‘More Than a Matter of Choice? New Relationships and Identifications in Health Care’, in L. Bauld, K. Clarke and T. Maltby (eds) Social Policy Review, 18 (2006), pp. 101–20.
M. Billig, S. Condor, D. Edwards, M. Gane, D. Middleton and A. R. Radley, Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking(London, 1988). On dilemmas, and their place in the study of governance, also see Bevir and Rhodes, Interpreting British Governance.
M. Billig, Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology(Cambridge, 1996, 2ndedition), p. 15.
C. Knowles, ‘Cultural Perspectives in Welfare Regimes’, in P. Chamberlayne, A. Cooper, R. Freeman and M. Rustin (eds) Welfare and Culture in Europe: Towards a New Paradigm in Social Policy(London, 1999), pp. 240–54.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Janet Newman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Newman, J. (2007). Governance as Cultural Practice: Texts, Talk and the Struggle for Meaning. In: Bevir, M., Trentmann, F. (eds) Governance, Consumers and Citizens. Consumption and Public Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591363_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591363_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35503-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59136-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)