Abstract
According to Vaclav Klaus, integration into the European Union does not go together with strong states and unregulated markets. This chapter contests the idea of a simple trade-off between integrating into the EU and leaving state power unabated. Though it will be argued that the character of the Czech state has fundamentally altered through its encounter with the European Union (EU), the Czech state, in interaction with transnational actors such as the EU, still plays a vital part in the shaping and regulating of the Czech economy. This chapter departs from the idea that what we are witnessing in the transitional economies of East Central Europe (ECE) is the transnationalization of the state, and in particular the transnationalization of governance. In discussing the politics of corporate governance regulation in the Czech Republic, it seeks to contribute to the discussion of state and society in ECE by challenging two fundamental premises that lie at the heart of most of the literature on the transition.
Our task is different. We should not Europeanize issues, but fight for the preservation of basic civil, political, and economic liberties. We need the institutional framework that makes them possible. We need unregulated markets; we need states to guarantee and safeguard the rule of law. The alternative is a non-state, post-democracy, and an administered society.
Václav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic Speech at the Fraser Institute, November 2004
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Endnotes
S. Estrin, D. M. Nuti and M. Uvalic, ‘The Impact of Investment Funds on Corporate Governance in Mass Privatization Schemes: Czech Republic Poland and Slovenia, Moct-Most, 10(1), 2000–, 1–26 (p. 1)
see also M. Boycko, A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny, ‘Second-best economic policy for a divided government’, European Economic Review 40(3–5), 1996, 767–74.
D. Lipton and J. Sachs, Privatization in Eastern Europe: the Case of Poland, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 2(2), 1990, 93–342.
R. V. Aguilera and G. Jackson, ‘The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants’, The Academy of Management Review 28 (3), 2003, 447–65 (p. 450).
H. Lasswell, Politics: Who Gets What, When, How, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.
S. Shields, ‘Global Restructuring and the Polish State: Transition, Information, or Trans-nationalisation?’ Review of International Political Economy 11(1), 2004, 132–54 (p. 132).
B. Deacon, M. Hulse and P. Stubbs, Global Social Policy: International organizations and the future of welfare, London: Sage, 1997, p. 147.
R. O. Dragneva and W. B. Simons, ‘Corporate Governance revisited: Can the Stakeholder Paradigm Provide a Way out of “Vulture” Capitalism in Eastern Europe’, Review of Central and East European Law 27(1), 2001, 93–111 (p. 94).
P. A. Hall and D. W. Soskice, Varieties of Capitalism: the Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 1.
M. Albert, Capitalism against Capitalism, London: Whurr, 1991.
M. J. Rubach and T. C. Sebora, ‘Comparative Corporate Governance: Compe titive Implications of an Emerging Convergence’, Journal of World Business 33(2), 1998, 167–84.
See for instance D. Lane, ‘Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Former State Socialist Societies’, Competition and Change 9(3), 2005, 227–47, and L. Cernat, ‘Institutions and Economic Growth: Which Model of Capitalism for Central and Eastern Europe?’, Journal for Institutional Innovation, Development and Transition 6, 2002, 18–34, for ECE
D. Lane, ‘What kind of Capitalism for Russia? A comparative analysis’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 33(1), 2000, 485–504, for Russia
M. Feldmann, ‘Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Transition Countries: The Case of Wage Bargaining in Estonia and Slovenia’, mimeo: C. Buchen, 2004, ‘What Kind of Capitalism is Emerging in Eastern Europe? Varieties of Capitalism in Estonia and Slovenia’, Paper presented at the 13th Research Seminar on ‘Managing the Economic Transition’, University of Cambridge, 12 March 2002, for Slovenia and Estonia. http://www.met-network.org.uk/met13_clemensbuchen.pdf (accessed 6 December 2006).
D. Stark, ‘Path Dependence and Privatization. Strategies in East Central Europe’, Eastern European Politics and Societies 6, 1991, 17–54, p. 36.
S. Neumann and M. Egan, ‘Between German and Anglo-Saxon Capitalism: the Czech Financial Markets in Transition’, New Political Economy 4(3), 1999, 173–94, p. 175.
K. Palda, ‘Czech Privatization and Corporate Governance’, Communist and post-communist Studies 30(1), 1997, 83–93, p. 93.
H. Jerábek and F. Zich, ‘The Czech Republic: Internationalization and Dependency’, in P. J. Katzenstein, ed., Mitteleuropa: Between Europe and Germany, Oxford: Berghahn Books, 1997, p. 190.
J. Hawkins and D. Mihaljek, The banking industry in the emerging market economies: competition, consolidation and systemic stability — an overview, Bank for International Settlements Working Paper 2004, p. 29.
P. G. Cerny, ‘International Finance and the Erosion of Capitalist Diversity’, in C. Crouch and W. Streeck, eds, Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity, London: Sage, 1997, p. 175.
J. Hanousek, E. Kocenda and J. Svejnar, Origin and Concentration: Corporate Ownership, Control and Performance, Cerge-EI Working Papers 259, 2005, pp. 23–4.
N. Bandelj, ‘Embedded Economies: Social Relations as Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe’, Social Forces 81(2), 2002, p. 433.
See S. Strange, ‘The Future of Global Capitalism; or, will divergence persist forever?’ in Crouch and Streeck, eds, 1997, 182–91, for a similar argument.
O. Holman, ‘The Enlargement of the European Union Towards Central and Eastern Europe: the Role of Supranational and Trans-national Actors’, in A. Bieler and A. D. Morton, eds, Social Forces in the Making of the New Europe. The Restructuring of European Social Relations in the Global Political Economy, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001, 161–84.
S. Gill, New Constitutionalism and the Reconstitution of Capital, 1998, p. 1, http://www.meijigakuin.ac.jp/~iism/pdf/nenpo_002/Gill.pdf (Last accessed 01 December 2006).
R. W. Cox, Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History, New York: Columbia University Press, 1987
L. Panitch, ‘Rethinking the Role of the State’, in J. Mittelman, ed., Globalization: Critical Reflections, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1996
N. Poulantzas, Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, translated by D. Fernbach, London: New Left Books, 1975 in general; for the context of ECE see Shields, op. cit.
Triska, quoted in J. Nellis, Privatization in Transition Economies: What Happened? What’s Next?, Washington DC: World Bank, mimeo 2000.
World Bank, World Development Report: From Plan to Market, New York: Oxford University Press, 1996, p. 47.
W. Andreff, ‘Corporate Governance of Privatized Enterprises in Transforming Economies: A Theoretical Approach’, MOCT-MOST, 2, 1996, 59–60.
J. Stiglitz, ‘Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?’ (Who guards the guardians?), Development Economics 6, 1999, 26–68.
G. A. McDermott, ‘Institutional Change and Firm Creation in East-Central Europe: An Embedded Politics Approach’, Comparative Political Studies 2, 2004, p. 189.
C. S. Meaney, ‘Foreign Experts, Capitalists, and competing agendas: Privatization in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary’, Comparative Political Studies 28, 1995, p. 303.
M. Dangerfield, ‘Neoliberalism and the Czech Transformation: Neoliberal Rhetoric or Neoliberal Reality?’, East European Politics and Societies 3, 1997, p. 440.
M. Havrda, ‘The Czech Republic: the Case of Delayed Transformation’, in M. Federocwicz and R.V. Aguilera, eds, Corporate Governance in a Changing Economic and Political Environment. Trajectories of Institutional Change, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2003, p. 133.
K. van der Pijl, German Reunification and World Politics, Sheffield Papers in International Studies, No. 7, 1991.
D. Bohle, ‘Erweiterung und Vertiefung der EU: Neoliberale Restrukturierung und trans-nationales Kapital’ (Widening and Deepening of the EU: neoliberal restructuring and trans-national capital), Prokla 3, 2002, p. 361.
H. Grabbe, A Partnership for Accession? The Implications of EU Conditionality for the Central and East European Applicants, Robert Schuman Centre Working Paper 12, Florence: European University Institute, 1999.
W. Jacoby, ‘Tutors and Pupil: International Organizations, Central European Elites, and Western Models’, Governance 2, 2001, 169–200.
L. Bruszt, ‘Making Markets and Eastern Enlargement: Diverging Convergence?’, West European Politics 2, 2002, p. 128.
G. Lawson, The Czech Republic and the Poverty of Transitology, paper presented at the Fifth Pan European International Relations Conference, The Hague, 9–11 September 2004, p. 34.
H. Grabbe, ‘European Integration and Corporate Governance in Central Europe: Trajectories of Institutional Change’, in M. Federocwicz and R. V. Aguilera, eds, Corporate Governance in a Changing Economic and Political Environment. Trajectories of Institutional Change, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2003, p. 248.
D. Bohle and B. Greskovits, ‘Ein Sozialmodel an der Grenze’ (A social model on the border), Osteuropa 5–6, 2004, 372–86.
M. Rhodes and B. van Apeldoorn, ‘Capital unbound? The transformation of European corporate governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 5(3), 1998, p. 422.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Arjan Vliegenthart
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vliegenthart, A. (2008). Transnational Actors and Corporate Governance in ECE: the Case of the EU and the Czech Republic. In: Pickles, J. (eds) State and Society in Post-Socialist Economies. Studies in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590922_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590922_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35681-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59092-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)