Abstract
Utilitarian economists use the term ‘utility’ carefully, but as was mentioned above there are two distinct views of it: the ‘satisfaction/happiness’ view and the ‘desire-fulfilment’ view. The happiness approach goes back to Bentham and has been used extensively by Marshall (1890), Pigou (1920) and others. The desire-based approach was pioneered by Sidgwick and developed by Ramsey (1926), Harsanyi (1976), Hare (1981), Mirrlees (1982) and others:
A plausible case can be made for taking either happiness, or desire-fulfilment … as guides to a person’s well-being. It would be odd to claim that a person broken down by pain and misery is doing very well, and no less peculiar to think of a person whose desires are systematically violated as achieving a high level of well-being. The issue is not whether either of these views have some plausibility — they both clearly do. The real question is whether either happiness or desire-fulfilment provides an adequate approach to well-being in general, and not just in rather special cases.
(Sen, 1985a: 17–18)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2007 Anthony Kelly
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kelly, A. (2007). Utility and Functionings. In: School Choice and Student Well-Being. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590281_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590281_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36170-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59028-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)