Abstract
Would a particular country be willing to reduce volatility at the expense of lowering the long-term growth rate if there were a trade-off between volatility and growth? Fortunately, there is no such trade-off. As many studies have documented (see Aghion et al., 2004 for a recent survey of the literature) the relationship between volatility and growth is negative, that is, rapid growth is associated with lower volatility. This result holds if one compares fast- and slow-growing countries, as well as periods of fast and slow growth/recession in the same country. So, policies to promote growth, if successful, are likely to reduce volatility as well, even though the mechanism of such a spin-off is not well understood. Nevertheless, the volatility of macro variables cannot be totally explained by their growth rates: even when controlling for the average speed of change, there remain huge variations in volatility in various countries and periods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Anatoliy Peresetsky and Vladimir Popov
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peresetsky, A., Popov, V. (2008). Russia. In: Fanelli, J.M. (eds) Macroeconomic Volatility, Institutions and Financial Architectures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590182_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590182_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36036-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59018-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)