Abstract
Rules and procedures provide structure to the process of negotiating for peace. Some rules, such as time frames and deadlines, are primarily intended to provide a formal structure for the process of negotiations, while others, such as pre-set constitutional guidelines aim to shape the outcome of the negotiating process. Often this seemingly neat distinction becomes blurred, as when tight deadlines affect the thoroughness with which negotiators deal with the details of a constitutional settlement. The aim of this chapter is to consider the impact of the structuring of peace processes through such rules and procedures, with special emphasis on the role of time frames and deadlines. The following questions will be taken up:
-
Who makes the rules and procedures? Participants or external third parties?
-
Do these rules and procedures apply to the process or to the outcome of peacemaking, and what effect, if any, do they have on each other?
-
Who acts as the enforcement agency, ensuring that the rules and procedures are upheld?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
I.W. Zartman & M.R. Berman, The Practical Negotiator ( New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1982 ) pp. 191–192.
A.E. Roth, J.K. Murnighan, & F. Schoumaker, ‘The deadline effect in bargaining: Some experimental evidence’, The American Economic Review, 78 (September 1988) pp. 806–823.
S. Ghee-Son Lim & J.K. Murnighan, ‘Phases, deadlines and the bargaining process’, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 58 (1994) pp. 153–171.
J. Barber & J. Barratt, South Africa’s Foreign Policy–The Search for Status and Security 1945–1988 ( Johannesburg: Southern, 1990 ), p. 22.
C.A. Crocker, High Noon in Southern Africa–Making Peace in a Rough Neighborhood ( Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball, 1992 ).
D. Atkinson, ‘Brokering a Miracle? The Multiparty Negotiating Forum’, in S. Friedman & D. Atkinson (eds), South African Review: 7 The Small Miracle–South Africa’s Negotiated Settlement (Johannesburg: Ravan Press, 1994), pp. 13–43, at p. 22.
P. du Toit, ‘South Africa: In Search of Post-Settlement Peace’, in J. Darby & R. Mac Ginty (eds), The Management of Peace Processes (London: Macmillan, 2000), pp. 16–60, at pp. 29, 30.
J. Kane-Berman (ed.), South Africa Survey 2004/2005 (Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations, 2006), pp. 371, 384.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Pierre du Toit
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
du Toit, P. (2008). Rules and Procedures for Negotiated Peacemaking. In: Darby, J., Ginty, R.M. (eds) Contemporary Peacemaking. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584556_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584556_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-21021-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58455-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)