Skip to main content

Rules and Procedures for Negotiated Peacemaking

  • Chapter

Abstract

Rules and procedures provide structure to the process of negotiating for peace. Some rules, such as time frames and deadlines, are primarily intended to provide a formal structure for the process of negotiations, while others, such as pre-set constitutional guidelines aim to shape the outcome of the negotiating process. Often this seemingly neat distinction becomes blurred, as when tight deadlines affect the thoroughness with which negotiators deal with the details of a constitutional settlement. The aim of this chapter is to consider the impact of the structuring of peace processes through such rules and procedures, with special emphasis on the role of time frames and deadlines. The following questions will be taken up:

  • Who makes the rules and procedures? Participants or external third parties?

  • Do these rules and procedures apply to the process or to the outcome of peacemaking, and what effect, if any, do they have on each other?

  • Who acts as the enforcement agency, ensuring that the rules and procedures are upheld?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. I.W. Zartman & M.R. Berman, The Practical Negotiator ( New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1982 ) pp. 191–192.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.E. Roth, J.K. Murnighan, & F. Schoumaker, ‘The deadline effect in bargaining: Some experimental evidence’, The American Economic Review, 78 (September 1988) pp. 806–823.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Ghee-Son Lim & J.K. Murnighan, ‘Phases, deadlines and the bargaining process’, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 58 (1994) pp. 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Barber & J. Barratt, South Africa’s Foreign Policy–The Search for Status and Security 1945–1988 ( Johannesburg: Southern, 1990 ), p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.A. Crocker, High Noon in Southern Africa–Making Peace in a Rough Neighborhood ( Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball, 1992 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Atkinson, ‘Brokering a Miracle? The Multiparty Negotiating Forum’, in S. Friedman & D. Atkinson (eds), South African Review: 7 The Small Miracle–South Africa’s Negotiated Settlement (Johannesburg: Ravan Press, 1994), pp. 13–43, at p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. du Toit, ‘South Africa: In Search of Post-Settlement Peace’, in J. Darby & R. Mac Ginty (eds), The Management of Peace Processes (London: Macmillan, 2000), pp. 16–60, at pp. 29, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Kane-Berman (ed.), South Africa Survey 2004/2005 (Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations, 2006), pp. 371, 384.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Pierre du Toit

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

du Toit, P. (2008). Rules and Procedures for Negotiated Peacemaking. In: Darby, J., Ginty, R.M. (eds) Contemporary Peacemaking. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584556_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics