Abstract
My subject is Blake’s conflict with the artistic values of his own time as expressed in certain writings of the years 1798 to 1811. These comprise his annotations to the second edition (1798) of The Works of Sir Joshua Reynolds with a very long Introduction by Edmond Malone, his Descriptive Catalogue of 1809, the Public Address of 1809–10, the Vision of the Last Judgment of 1810 and a number of Notebook poems written from perhaps 1807 until 1812.1 The first four have been given considerable attention by scholars, while the last has not. Perhaps because of their free-and-easy manner, doggerel rhyming and frequently outrageous humour, Blake’s poems about art and artists have never been given serious — or even flippant — consideration in their own right. I want to argue that they have great interest both as satire and as expressions of Blake’s views about art, artists and the art market, and also that a major impetus for them was Blake’s reaction to an event that has also been little discussed in relation to him: the Orléans Sale of 1798, the greatest sale of Italian, French and Spanish paintings that had ever taken place in London. First, I will address the question of why Blake did not express his views about art earlier, especially when there had been a previous Orläans sale, of the Dutch and Flemish paintings in the collection, in 1793.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For dating see The Notebook of William Blake: A Photographic and Typographic Facsimile, ed. by David V. Erdman with the assistance of Donald K. Moore (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973), pp. 13, 56–7 and 71–2. This edition will be cited as N, with the poem’s number following.
See David Bindman, ‘Blake’s “Gothicised Imagination” and the History of England’, in William Blake: Essays in Honour of Sir Geoffrey Keynes, ed. by Morton, D. Paley and Michael Phillips (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973), pp. 1–28.
See Gerald Reitlinger, The Economics of Taste: The Rise and Tall of the Picture Market 1760–1969 (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964), p. 28. The price of admission was one shilling.
The Courier, 26 June 1811; see Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Essays on His Own Times, ed. by D. V. Erdman, 3 vols (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978), ii, 195–6; for information on and images of Catalani see the NPG website, available at: <http://www.npg.org.uk/live/search/=
Morris Eaves, The Counter-Arts Conspiracy: Art and Industry in the Age of Blake (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992), p.173. Blake also uses Poco Piu in Public Address (E581), where it is linked with ‘Niggling’ or fussing unnecessarily about details (but an earlier meaning, still current in Blake’s day, was ‘having sexual intercourse’).
Joshua Reynolds, Discourses on Art, ed. by Robert R. Wark, rev. 2nd edn (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1975; repr. 1997), Discourse i, pp. 272–3.
The picture is reproduced in Joshua Reynolds: The Creation of Celebrity, ed. by Martin Pottle (London: Tate Publishing, 2005), p. 81.
All figures are from E. B. Bentley, ‘Grave Indignities: Greed, Hucksterism, and Oblivion: Blake’s Watercolors for Blair’s Grave’, BIQ, 40 (2006), 66–71.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Morton D. Paley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paley, M.D. (2009). Blake’s Poems on Art and Artists. In: Haggarty, S., Mee, J. (eds) Blake and Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584280_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584280_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36487-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58428-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)