Abstract
‘Humanitarian intervention’, despite its positive rhetorical connotations, has become one of the key causes of contention and controversy in contemporary international relations. Each of the issues inherent in this debate — human rights, sovereignty, order versus justice, the role of the UN — constitutes seminal current concems in itself; together the issues create almost limitless scope for discussion and dispute. This capacity for dissonance is unsurprising given that the fundamental question raised by this issue — ‘when is it right to use force to protect those suffering in other states?’ — interrogates humanity’s moral values, challenges the composition of the international political system and questions the responsibilities and duties of all major international actors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Quoted in J. Mayall, ‘ Non-Intervention, Self-Determination and the “New World Order”’, International Affairs, 67, 3 (1991), p. 427.
T. Landman, Studying Human Rights (London: Routledge, 2006), p. 8.
G. Robertson, Crimes against Humanity (London: Penguin, 2002), p. 220.
T. Nardin, ‘The Moral Basis of Humanitarian Intervention’, in Anthony Lang (ed.), Just Intervention (Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2003), pp. 11–27.
R. Miller, ‘Respectable Oppressors, Hypocritical Liberators’, in Deen Chatterjee and Don Scheid (eds), Ethics and Foreign Intervention (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 215–50.
R. Thakur, ‘Intervention, Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: Experiences from ICISS’, Security Dialogue, 33, 3 (2002), pp. 327–28.
E. Herman and D. Peterson, ‘Morality’s Avenging Angels: The New Humanitarian Crusaders’, in David Chandler (ed.), Rethinking Human Rights (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), pp. 196–216.
J. Chopra and T. Weiss, ‘Sovereignty is no Longer Sacrosanct’, Ethics and International Affairs, 6 (1992), p. 95.
M. Shaw, Global Society and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
S. Hoffmann, ‘Intervention: Should It Go On? Can It Go On?’ in Chatterjee TTT and Scheid TTT(eds), Ethics and Foreign Intervention (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 22.
A. Linklater, ‘The Good International Citizen and the Crisis in Kosovo’, summary in Albrecht Schnabel and Ramesh Thakur (eds), Kosovo and the Challenge of Humanitarian Intervention (New York: United Nations University Press, 2000).
See A. Arend and R. Beck, International Law and the Use of Force (London: Routledge, 1993).
T. Pangle and P. Ahrensdorf, Justice among Nations (Lawrence KS: University of Kansas Press, 1999), p. 3.
N. Wheeler, Saving Strangers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 11.
E. H. Carr, The Twenty Years Crisis, 1919–1939 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001).
S. Chesterman, ‘Hard Cases Make Bad Law’, in Anthony Lang (ed.), Just Intervention (Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2003), p. 54.
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, The Responsibility to Protect: Research, Bibliography, Background (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001), p. vii.
Independent International Commission on Kosovo, Kosovo Report (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 4.
N. Gardels, ‘The Paradox of Post-Heroic Warfare’, New Perspectives Quarterly, 16, 4 (1999), p. 2.
D. Chatterjee and D. Scheid, ‘Introduction’, in Chatterjee TTT and Scheid TTT (eds), Ethics and Foreign Intervention (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 5.
M. Ignatieff, Virtual War (London: Vintage, 2001), p. 210.
N. Wheeler, ‘Agency, Humanitarianism and Intervention’, International Political Science Review, 18, 1 (1997), p. 22.
M. Waltzer, ‘The Politics of Rescue’, Dissent (1995), pp. 35–41.
M. Kaldor, Global Civil Society: An Answer to War (Cambridge: Polity, 2003), p. 13.
B. Kouchner, ‘The Right to Intervention: Codified in Kosovo’, New Perspectives Quarterly, 16, 4 (1999), pp. 4–6.
For example, Nardin, ‘Moral Basis for Humanitarian Intervention’, p. 23; Wheeler, Saving Strangers, p. 34; J. Stromseth, ‘Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention: The Case for Incremental Change’, in Jeff Holzgrefe and Robert Keohane (eds), Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 248.
A. Bellamy, ‘Ethics and Intervention: The “Humanitarian Exception” and the Problems of Abuse in the Case of Iraq’, Journal of Peace Research, 41, 2 (2004), p. 134.
B. Parekh, ‘Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention’, International Political Science Review, 18, 1 (1997), p. 49.
See A. Buchanan and R. Keohane, ‘The Preventive Use of Force: A Cosmopolitan Institutional Proposal’, Ethics and International Affairs, 18, 1 (2004), pp. 1–22.
J. Donnelly, ‘Twentieth Century Realism’, in Terry Nardin and David Mapel (eds), Traditions of Intemational Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), p. 85.
H. Morgenthau, Scientific Man versus Power Politics (Chicago, IL: Phoenix Books, 1965), p. 195.
C. Krauthammer, ‘In Bosnia Partition Might Do’, International Herald Tribune, 9 September 1992, p. 18.
T. B. Knudsen, ‘Humanitarian Intervention Revisited: Post Cold War Responses to Classical Problems’, in Michael Pugh (ed.), The UN, Peace and Force (London: Frank Cass, 1997), p. 150.
T. Franck and N. Rodley, ‘After Bangladesh: The Law of Humanitarian Intervention by Force’, American Journal of International Law, 67 (1973), pp. 275–305.
A. Lang, ‘Humanitarian Intervention: Definition and Debates’, in Lang (ed.), Just Intervention (Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2003), p. 2.
See Wheeler, ‘Agency, Humanitarianism and Intervention’, p. 13; C. Lu, Just and Unjust Interventions in World Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), Chap. 3.
Danish Institute of International Affairs, Humanitarian Intervention (Copenhagen: Danish Institute of International Affairs, 1999), p. 34.
See F. Hampson, ‘Law and War’, in Alex Danchev and Thomas Halverston (eds), International Perspectives on the Yugoslav Crisis (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1996), p. 149; Danish Institute of International Affairs, Humanitarian Intervention, p. 20.
M. Burton, ‘Legalising the Sublegal’, Georgetown Law Journal, 85 (1996), p. 422.
S. Chesterman, Just War or Just Peace? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 87.
C. Reus-Smit, ‘Liberal Hierarchy and the Licence to Use Force’, in David Armstrong, Theo Farrell and Bice Maiguashca (eds), Force and Legitimacy in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), p. 72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Aidan Hehir
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hehir, A. (2008). Introduction: The Humanitarian Intervention Controversy. In: Humanitarian Intervention after Kosovo. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584105_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584105_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35985-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58410-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)