Advertisement

A Leader’s Journey to Engage

  • Jane Trinder
Chapter
  • 419 Downloads

Abstract

Despite the focus of contemporary leadership and change theory on the need for transformational leaders as visionary inspirers of change, many change initiatives still fail to deliver. Instead, they often increase cynicism and frustration. The focus of this chapter is following the journey of four people developing the capabilities to engage others in change activity. This chapter brings together an overview of the literature and an empirical study.

Keywords

Emotional Intelligence Transformational Leader Change Agenda Journal ofApplied Leadership Learn 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Abraham, ‘Emotional intelligence in organizations: A conceptualization’, Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 125(2) (1999) 209–224.Google Scholar
  2. C.N. Alexander, D.P. Heaton and H.M. Chandler, ‘Advanced human development in the Vedic psychology of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi: Theory and research’, in M. Miller and S. Cook-Greuter (eds), Transcendence and Mature Thought in Adulthood (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994).Google Scholar
  3. K. Anderson and G. Zhu, Organisational Climate Survey Technical Manual (Boston: Hay Group, 2002).Google Scholar
  4. C. Argyris, Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Learning (Sydney: Allyn and Bacon, 1990).Google Scholar
  5. R.H. Axelrod, Terms of Engagement (San Francisco, CA: Berrett Koehler, 2002).Google Scholar
  6. B.M. Bass and B.J. Avolio, Improving Organizational Performance Through Transformational Leadership (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994), p. 68.Google Scholar
  7. D. Bohm, On Dialogue (London: Routledge, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. S.R. Cook-Greuter, Postautonomous Ego Development: A Study of its Nature and Measurement. Doctoral dissertation. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education, 1999). UMI Dissertation Services 933122.Google Scholar
  9. M. Csikszentmihalyi, Beyond Boredom and Anxiety (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982).Google Scholar
  10. J.A. Conger and K. Xin, ‘Executive education in the 21st century’, journal of Management Education, 24(1) (2000) 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Dawson, Organizational Change: A Processual Approach (London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 1994).Google Scholar
  12. E.L. Deci, Intrinsic Motivation (New York: Plenum, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. W.H. Drath, ‘Managerial strengths and weaknesses as functions of the development of personal meaning’, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26(4) (1990) 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Fisher, D. Rooke and W. Torbert, Personal and Organisational Transformations through Action Enquiry (Boston, MA: Edge/Work Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  15. Gallup survey, ‘Engaged employees inspire company innovation’, Gallup Management Journal, October 2006.Google Scholar
  16. J.R. Gibb, ‘Defensive communication’, Journal of Communication, 11 (1961) 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. E. Goffman, Encounters (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merril Co, 1961).Google Scholar
  18. D. Goleman, Working with Emotional Intelligence (New York: Bantam Books, 1998).Google Scholar
  19. M.J. Hatch, Organization Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  20. J.A. Haudan and D. MacLean, ‘E’ is engagement: Transforming your business by transforming your people’, Journal of Change Management, 2(3) (2002).Google Scholar
  21. J. Heron, Co-Operative Inquiry: Research into the Human Condition (London: Sage Publications, 1996).Google Scholar
  22. C. Hodgkinson, Educational Leadership: The Moral Art (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  23. N.L. Jimmieson, D.J. Terry and V.J. Callan, ‘A longitudinal study of employee adaptation to organisational change: The role of change-related information and change-related self-efficacy’, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(1) (2004) 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. T.A. Judge, C.J. Thoresen, V. Pucik and T.M. Welbourne, ‘Managerial coping with organisational change: A dispositional perspective’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1) (1999) 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. W.A. Kahn, ‘Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work’, Academy of Management Journal, 3 (1990) 692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. W.A. Kahn, ‘To be fully there: Psychological presence at work’, Human Relations, 45 (1992) 321–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. A. Kakabadse, N. Kakabadse and K. Kalu, ‘Communicative action through collaborative inquiry: Journey of a facilitating co-inquirer’, Systematic Practice and Action Research, 20(3) (2007) 245–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. A. Keene, ‘Complexity theory: The changing role of leadership’, Industrial and Commercial Training, 32(1) (2000) 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. R. Kegan, The Evolving Self (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  30. R. Kegan, In Over Our Heads: The Mental Demands of Modern Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  31. J.R. Kellett, R.H. Humphrey and R.G. Sleeth, ‘Empathy and complex task performance: Two routes to leadership’, The Leadership Quarterly, 13 (2002) 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Kotter, ‘Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail’, Harvard Business Review, March/April (1995).Google Scholar
  33. B. Kowalski, ‘The engagement gap: A growing crisis for training and development’, Human Resource Executive (2002).Google Scholar
  34. E.J. Langer, Mindfulness (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1989).Google Scholar
  35. K. Lewin, ‘Frontiers in group dynamics’, in D. Cartwright (ed.), Field Theory in Social Science, Social Science (New York: Harper & Bros, 1947/1951).Google Scholar
  36. R. Lewin and B. Regine, The Soul at Work: Listen… Respond… Let Go: Embracing Complexity Science for Business Success (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000).Google Scholar
  37. J. Loevinger, Ego Development: Conceptions and Theories (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1976).Google Scholar
  38. C. Mabey and B. Mayon-White (eds), Managing Change, 2nd Edition (London: The Open University/Paul Chapman Publishing, 1993).Google Scholar
  39. D.A. Mack, D.L. Nelson and J.C. Quick, ‘The stress of organizational change: a dynamic process model’, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47(2) (1998) 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. A.H. Maslow, Toward a Psychology of Being, 2nd Edition (New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1968).Google Scholar
  41. J.D. Mayer and P. Salovey, ‘What is emotional intelligence? Implications for educators’, in P. Salovey and D. Sluyter (eds), Emotional Development, Emotional Literacy, and Emotional Intelligence (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1997) pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
  42. M. Millar ‘Employers failing to engage employees with organisational goals’ IBIS survey, Personnel Today, June 2006.Google Scholar
  43. R. Quinn and N. Snyder, ‘Advanced change theory’, in J.A. Conger, G.M. Spreitzer and E.E. Lawler III (eds), Leader’s Change Handbook: An Essential Guide to Setting Direction (San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1998).Google Scholar
  44. P. Reason, Human Inquiry in Action: Developments in New Paradigm Research (Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1988).Google Scholar
  45. R.W. Revan, The Origin and Growth of Action Learning (London: Chartwell-Bratt, 1982).Google Scholar
  46. E.M. Schein, Organizational Culture and Leadership (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1985).Google Scholar
  47. K.K. Smith and D.N. Berg, Paradoxes of Group Life (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987).Google Scholar
  48. J. Smythe, The CEO Chief Engagement Officer: Turning Hierarchy Upside Down to Drive Performance (Aldershot: Gower, 2007).Google Scholar
  49. B.L. Toffler, Tough Choices: Managers Talk Ethics (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986).Google Scholar
  50. W. Torbert, The Power of Balance: Transforming Self Society and Scientific Inquiry (Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, 1991).Google Scholar
  51. M. Weisbord, Productive Workplaces (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jane Trinder 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane Trinder

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations